The present study examined the relation between the type of relationship onset on the one hand and the degree to which partners have similar personalities and relationship quality on the other hand. It was hypothesized that partners who fell in love at first sight, relative to partners who got involved more gradually, entered into intimate relationships more shortly after they met, would have mates with less similar personalities, especially with regard to levels of extraversion, emotional stability and autonomy, and would report relatively low levels of relationship quality. In a sample of 137 married or cohabiting couples, it was found that, as predicted, partners who fell in love at first sight became romantically involved more quickly, and showed more dissimilar personalities with regard to levels of extraversion, emotional stability and autonomy. Partners who fell in love at first sight did not report lower relationship quality. Instead, partner personality trait similarity was related to relationship quality as a function of both relationship onset and specific personality traits.
Bond, M.H. (1979). Dimensions used in perceiving peers: Cross-cultural comparisons of Hong Kong, Japanese, American and Filipino university students . International Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 47—56.
7.
Bradbury, T.N., & Fincham, F.D. (1988). Individual difference variables in close relationships: A contextual model of marriage as an integrative framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 713—721.
8.
Buss, D.M. (1991). Conflict in married couples: Personality predictors of anger and upset. Journal of Personality, 59(4), 663—688.
9.
Buunk, B.P., Dijkstra, P., Kenrick, D.T., & Warntjes, A. (2001). Age preferences for mates as related to gender, own age, and involvement level. Evolution and Human Behaviour , 22, 241—250.
10.
Byrne, D. (1971) The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
11.
Byrne, D., & Nelson, D. (1965). The effect of topic importance and attitude similarity—dissimilarity on attraction in multistranger design. Psychonomic Science , 3, 449—50.
12.
Caspi, A., & Herbener, E.S. (1990). Continuity and change: Assortative marriage and the consistency of personality in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 250—258.
13.
Cattell, R.B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476—506.
14.
Cattell, R.B. (1945). The description of personality: Principles and findings in a factor analysis. American Journal of Psychology , 58, 69—90.
15.
Cattell, R.B., Eber, H.W., & Tatsuoka, M.M. (1970). Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
16.
De Raad, B. (2000). The Big Five Personality Factors: The psycholexical approach to personality. Ashland: Hogrefe & Huber.
17.
De Raad, B., & Barelds, D.P.H. (under review). A new taxonomy of Dutch personality trait descriptors.
18.
Digman, J.M., & Takemoto-Chock, N.K. (1981). Factors in the natural language of personality: Re-analysis, comparison, and interpretation of six major studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16(2), 149—170.
19.
Gattis, K.S., Berns, S., Simpson, L.E., & Christensen, A. (2004). Birds of a feather or strange birds? Ties among personality dimensions, similarity, and marital quality . Journal of Family Psychology,18(4), 564—574.
20.
Goldberg, L. (1990). An alternative `description of personality': The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216—1229.
21.
Goldberg, L. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits . American Psychologist, 48(1), 26—34.
22.
Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Measuring passionate love in intimate relationships . Journal of Adolescence, 9(4), 383—410.
23.
Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S.S., & Dicke, A. (1998). The Love Attitude Scale: Short form. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 147—159.
24.
Hendriks, A.A.J. (1997). The construction of the Five-Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI). Groningen: RijksuniversiteitGroningen.
25.
Hendriks, J.A.A., Perugini, M., Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F., Johnson, J.A., De Fruyt, F., et al. (2003). The five-factor personality inventory: Cross-cultural generalizability across 13 countries. European Journal of Personality, 17(5), 347—373.
26.
Jensen-Campbell, L.A., Adams, R., Perry, D.G., Workman, K.A., Furdella, J.O., & Egan, S.K. (2002). Agreeableness, extraversion, and peer relations in early adolescence: Winning friends and deflecting aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(3), 224—251.
27.
Jones, M.E., & Stanton, A.L. (1988). Disfunctional beliefs, belief similarity, and marital distress: A comparison of models. Journal of Social &Clinical Psychology, 7(1), 1—14.
28.
Karney, B.R., & Bradbury, T.N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research . Psychological Bulletin,118, 3—34.
29.
Kashy, D.A., Campbell, L., & Harris, D.W. (2006). Advances in data analytic approaches for relationship research: The broad utility of hierarchical linear modelling. In A. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 73—90). New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Kashy, D.A., & Kenny, D.A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 451—477). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Kelly, E.L., & Conley, J.J. (1987). Personality and compatibility: A prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 27—40.
32.
Klohnen, E.C., & Luo, S. (2003). Interpersonal attraction and personality: What is attractive — Self similarity, ideal similarity, complementarity, or attachment security?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 706—722.
33.
Langlois, J.H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A.J., Lavson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390—423.
34.
Lee, J.A. (1988). Lovestyles. In R. Sternberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 38—67). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35.
Lucas, T.W., Wendorf, C.A., Imamoglu, O.E., Shen, J., Parkhill, M.R., Weisfeld, C.C., et al. (2004). Marital satisfaction in four cultures as a function of homogamy, male dominance and female attractiveness. Sexualities, Evolution & Gender,6(2—3), 97—130.
36.
Luo, S., & Klohnen, E.C. (2005). Assortative mating and marital quality in newlyweds: A coupled-centered approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 304—326.
37.
Lykken, D.T., & Tellegen, A. (1993) Is human mating adventitious or the result of lawful choice? A twin study of mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 56—68.
38.
McNulty, J.K., & Karney, B.R. (2004). `Should I expect the best or brace for the worst?' The role of positive expectations in the early years of marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 729—743.
39.
Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1982). Target attractiveness as a mediator of assumed attitude similarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 8, 725—738.
40.
Morry, M.M. (2005). Relationship satisfaction as a predictor of similarity ratings: A test of the attraction-similarity hypothesis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(4), 561—584.
41.
Murray, S.L., & Holmes, J.G. (1997). A leap of faith? Positive illusions in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 23(6), 586—604.
42.
Murray, S.L., Holmes, J.G., & Griffin, D.W. (1996). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1155—1180.
43.
Norman, W.T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 574—583.
44.
Pervin, L.A., Cervone, D., & John, O.P. (2005). Personality: Theory and research. Hoboken, NY : John Wiley & Sons.
45.
Robins, R.W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T.E. (2000). Two personalities, one relationship: Both partners' personality traits shape the quality of their relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2), 251—259.
46.
Sternberg, R.J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review,93, 119—135.
47.
Sternberg, R.J. (1997). Construct validation of a triangular love scale . European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 313—335.
48.
Thiessen, D., Young, R.K., & Delgado, M. (1997). Social pressures for assortative mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 22(2), 157—164.
49.
Wentzel, K., & Erdley, C. (1993) Strategies for making friends: Relations to social behaviour and peer acceptance in early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 29, 819—826.
