Are cognitive representations of friends' request refusals implemented in the orbitofrontal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices? A cognitive neuroscience approach to ‘theory of mind’ in relationships
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2006
Are cognitive representations of friends' request refusals implemented in the orbitofrontal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices? A cognitive neuroscience approach to ‘theory of mind’ in relationships
Formulating cognitive representations of others' mental states when interpreting behavior (i.e., ‘theory of mind’) rather than merely focusing on the behavior is considered a distinctly human trait which both interpersonal scholars and cognitive neuroscientists agree plays a critical role in the development and maintenance of social relationships. Although brain-imaging studies have led to huge advances in the understanding of memory and language, theories of social relationships remain relatively uninformed by cognitive neuroscience. In the present study, hypotheses regarding the implementation of theory of mind in a relationship context are (a) derived from extant theory and research, and (b) tested via brain-imaging technology. Specifically, spectrum analyses were conducted using brain wave recordings collected by an electroencephalograph (EEG) monitoring oscillations in the gamma range for the orbitofrontal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices while participants attempted to construct cognitive representations regarding a friend's request refusal. Results indicated statistically greater electrical activity in both cortical regions for participants engaged in the task than for participants in the control condition. The implications of the findings for building a fully elaborated sequential process model of cognitive representations in interpersonal contexts, among other theoretical endeavors, are discussed.
Andersen, P. A. , Garrison, J. P. , & Andersen, J. F. (1979). Implications of a neurophysical approach for the study of nonverbal communication . Human Communication Research, 6, 74–89 .
2.
Bachara, A. , Damasio, A. R. , Damasio, H. , & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex . Cognition, 50, 7–15 .
3.
Bachara, A. , Tranel, D. , Damasio, H. , & Damasio, A. R. (1996). Failure to respond automatically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex . Cerebral Cortex, 6, 215–225 .
4.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). The cognitive neuroscience of autism: Evolutionary approaches. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (pp. 845–866). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
5.
Baron-Cohen, S. , Ring, H. , Moriarity, J. , Shmitz, P. , Costa, D. , & Ell, P. (1994). Recognition of mental state terms: A clinical study of autism, and a functional neuroimaging study of normal adults . British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 640–649 .
6.
Beatty, M. J. (November, 2003). In search of physical evidence of verbal planning: A cognitive neuroscience approach to construct validation . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Miami Beach, FL.
7.
Beatty, M. J. , Heisel, A. D. , Hall, A. E. , Levine, T. R. , & La France, B. H. (2002). What can we learn from the study of twins about genetic and environmental influences on interpersonal affiliation, aggressiveness, and social anxiety? A meta-analytic study . Communication Monographs, 69, 1–18 .
8.
Beatty, M. J. , & McCroskey, J. C. (1998). Interpersonal communication as temperamental expression: A communibiological paradigm. In J. C. McCroskey , J. A. Daly , M. M. Martin , & M. J. Beatty (Eds.), Communication and personality: Trait perspectives (pp. 41–68). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press .
9.
Berger, C. R. (2002). Goals and knowledge structures in social interaction. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication(pp. 181–212). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications .
10.
Boomsma, D. , Anokhin, A. , & de Geus, E. (1997). Genetics of electrophysiology: Linking genes, brain, and behavior . Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 106–110 .
11.
Brown, C. M. , Hagoort, P. , & Kutas, M. (2000). Postlexical integration processes in language comprehension: Evidence from brain imaging research. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences(pp. 881–895). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
12.
Buckner, R. L. (2000). Neuroimaging of memory. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (pp. 817–828). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
13.
Carter, C. S. , Braver, T. S. , Barch, D. M. , Botvinick, M. M. , Noll, D. , & Cohen, J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and online monitoring of performance . Science, 230, 747–749 .
14.
Cheney, D. L. , & Seyfarth, R. M. (1990). How monkeys see the world. Chicago: Chicago University Press .
15.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
16.
D'Esposito, M. , Detre, J. A. , Alsop, D. C. , Shin, R. K. , Atlas, S. , & Grossman, M. (1995). The neural basis of the central executive system of working memory . Nature, 378, 279–281 .
17.
Damasio, A. R. (1995). Toward a neurobiology of emotion and feeling: Operational concepts and hypotheses . Neuroscientist, 1, 19–25 .
18.
Damasio, A. R. , Tranel, D. , & Damasio, H. (1991). Somatic markers and the guidance of behavior: Theory and preliminary testing. In H. S. Levin , H. M. Eisenberg , & A. L. Benton (Eds.), Frontal lobe function and dysfunction(pp. 217–229). New York: Oxford University Press .
19.
Davidson, R. J. , & Hugdahl, K. (Eds.). (1995). Brain asymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
20.
Fletcher, P. C. , Happe, F. , Frith, U. , Baker, S. C. , Dolan, R. J. , Frackowisk, R. S. J. , & Frith, C. D. (1995). Other minds in the brain: A functional imaging study of ‘theory of mind’ in story comprehension . Cognition, 57, 109–128 .
21.
Floyd, K. , & Mikkelson,A. C. (2003). Effects of brain laterality on decoding accuracy for facial displays of emotion . Communication Quarterly, 51, 419–427 .
22.
Fuster, J. (1997). The prefrontal cortex: Anatomy, physiology, and neuropsychology of the frontal lobe. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven .
23.
Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed.). (2000). The new cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
24.
Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1987). Circuitry of the prefrontal cortex and the regulation of behavior by representational memory. In F. Plum & V. P. Mountcastle (Eds.), Handbook of physiology: The nervous system: Volume 5. Higher functions of the brain (pp. 373–417). Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society .
25.
Hale, C. L. , & Delia, J. G. (1976). Cognitive complexity and social perspective-taking . Communication Monographs, 43, 195–203 .
26.
Harner, P. A. , & Sannit, T. (1974). A review of the international ten-twenty system of electrode placement. Quincy, MA: Grass Instruments .
27.
Indefrey, P. , & Levelt, W. J. M. (2000). The neural correlates of language production. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (pp. 845–866). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
28.
Laing, R. D. (1969). Self and others. London: Tavistock Publications .
29.
Levelt, W. J. M. (2000). Introduction. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (pp. 843–844). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
30.
Levy, R. , & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (2000). Segregation of working memory function within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex . Experimental Brain Research, 133, 23–32 .
31.
Marieb, E. N. , & Mallatt, J. (1992). Human anatomy. New York: Benjamin/Cummings .
32.
Petrides, M. (2000). The role of the mid-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in working memory . Experimental Brain Research, 133, 44–54 .
33.
Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: Harper-Collins .
34.
Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: W. W. Norton .
35.
Premack, D. , & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 515–526 .
36.
Preus,T. M. (2000). What's human about the human brain? In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences(pp. 1219–1234). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
37.
Provinelli, D. J. , & Preus, T. M. (1995). Theory of mind: Evolutionary history of cognitive specialization . Trends in Neuroscience, 18, 418–424 .
38.
Rogers, C. (1970). Carl Rogers on encounter groups. New York: Harrow Books .
39.
Rowe, J. B. , Toni, I. , Josephs, O. , Frackowiak, R. S. , & Passingham, R. E. (2000). Prefrontal cortex: Response selection or maintenance within working memory . Science, 288, 1656–1660 .
40.
Rugg, M. D. , & Allan, K. (2000). Memory retrieval: An electrophysiological perspective. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (pp. 805–816). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
41.
Sellers, D. E. , & Stacks, D. W. (1990). Toward a hemispheric processing approach to communication competence . Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 45–59 .
42.
Selman, R. L. (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding: Developmental and clinical analyses. New York: Academic Press .
43.
Stacks, D. W. , & Andersen, P. A. (1989). The modular mind: Implications for intrapersonal communication . Southern Communication Journal, 54, 273–293 .
44.
Stacks, D. W. , & Sellers, D. E. (1986). Toward a holistic approach to communication: The effect of ‘pure’ hemispheric reception on message acceptance . Communication Quarterly, 34, 266–285 .
45.
Stacks, D. W. , & Sellers, D. E. (1989). Understanding intrapersonal communication: Neurological processing implications. In C. V. Roberts & K. W. Watson (Eds.), Intrapersonal communication: Original essays(pp. 243–267). New Orleans, LA: SPECTRA Incorporated & Gorsuch-Scarisbrick .
46.
Stromswold, K. (2000). The cognitive neuroscience of language acquisition. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences(pp. 909–932). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
47.
Stuss, D. T. , & Benson, D. F. (1986). The frontal lobes. New York: Raven Press .
48.
Tanji, J. , & Hoshi, E. (2001). Behavioral planning in the prefrontal cortex . Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 164–170 .
49.
Taylor, S. E. , & Fiske, S. T. (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(pp. 249–288). New York: Academic Press .
50.
Tomasello, M. , & Call, J. (1997). Primate cognition. New York: Oxford University Press .
51.
Tooby, J. , & Cosmides, L. (2000). Toward mapping a functional organization of mind and brain. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences(pp. 1167–1178). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
52.
Treisman, A. (1999). Solutions to the binding problem: Progress through controversy and convergence . Neuron, 24, 105–110 .
