Using Multilevel Random Coefficient Modeling to Analyze Social Interaction Diary Data

Abstract

This article provides a rationale for using multilevel random coefficient modeling (MRCM) to analyze social interaction diary data, and describes how to conduct such analyses. This description includes how to examine relationships between individual differences in social interaction and other trait-level individual differences such as personality scales. Analyzing relationships among different ratings of interactions and analyzing differences among types of interactions are also described, including techniques to examine how relationships between trait-level individual differences and reactions to interaction vary across different types of interactions (e.g., interactions with different relational partners). Different types of analyses are illustrated using data from actual studies. Although this article focuses on the analysis of data collected using variants of the Rochester Interaction Record, the techniques described can be used to analyze data collected using other methods and protocols.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .

Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .

Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression and correlation analyses for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .

DePaulo, B., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. A., Wyer, M. M., & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979–995 .

Gable, S. L., & Reis, H. T. (1999). Now and then, them and us, this and that: Studying relationships across time, partner, context, and person . Personal Relationships, 6, 415–432 .

Hodgins, H. S., Koestner, R., & Duncan, N. (1996). On the compatibility of autonomy and relatedness . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 227–237 .

Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology(4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 233–265). New York: McGraw-Hill .

Kreft, I. G. G., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .

Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., & Wolfinger, R. D. (1996). SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute .

10.

Nezlek, J. B. (1995). Social construction, sex/sex similarity, and social interaction in close personal relationships . Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 503–520 .

11.

Nezlek, J. B. (1999). Body self-evaluation and day-to-day social interaction . Journal ofPersonality, 67, 793–817 .

12.

Nezlek, J. B. (2001). Multilevel random coefficient analyses of event and interval contingent data in social and personality psychology research . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 771–785 .

13.

Nezlek, J. B., & Derks, P. (2001). Use of humor as a coping mechanism, psychological adjustment, and social interaction . Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 14, 395–413 .

14.

Nezlek, J. B., Hampton, C. A., & Shean, G. D. (2000). Clinical depression and everyday social interaction in a community sample . Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 11–19 .

15.

Nezlek, J. B., Imbrie, M., & Shean, G. D. (1994). Depression and everyday social interaction . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1101–1111 .

16.

Nezlek, J. B., & Leary, M. R. (2002). Individual differences in self-presentational motives and daily social interaction . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 211–223 .

17.

Nezlek, J. B., & Plesko, R. M. (2003). Affect- and self-based models of relationships between daily events and daily well-being . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 584–596 .

18.

Nezlek, J. B., Richardson, D. S., Green, L. R., & Schatten-Jones, E.C. (2002). Psychological well-being and day-to-day social interaction among older adults . Personal Relationships, 9, 57–71 .

19.

Nezlek, J. B., & Wheeler, L. (1984). RIRAP: Rochester Interaction Record Analysis Package . Psychological Documents, 14, 6-6 . (Ms. No. 2610)

20.

Rabash, J., Yang, M., Woodhouse, G., & Goldstein, H. (1995). MLn: Command reference guide. London: Institute of Education .

21.

Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. (2000). HLM. Chicago: Scientific Software .

22.

Schnabel, K. U., Little, T. D., & Baumert, J. (2000). Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data. In T. D. Little, U. K. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples(pp. 9–14). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .

23.

Singer, J. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models . Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 323–355 .

24.

Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis. London: Sage .

25.

Snijders, T. A. B., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). The social relations model for family data: A multilevel approach . Personal Relationships, 6, 471–486 .

26.

Sullivan, L. A., Nezlek, J. B., & Jackson, L. A. (2001). A multilevel analysis of providing, receiving, and exchanging social support in everyday social interaction. Unpublished manuscript, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA.

27.

Wheeler, L., & Nezlek, J. (1977). Sex differences in social participation . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 742–754 .

28.

Zuroff, D. C., Stotland, S., Sweetman, E., Craig, J. A., & Koestner, R. (1995). Dependency, self-criticism, and social interactions . British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 34, 543–553 .