We hypothesized that relationship well-being will be higher if: (i) individuals' relationships are developing in the way they think relationships typically should; and (ii) individuals agree with their partners on how relationships in general, as well as their own relationship, should develop. Thirty dating couples were asked to sort a set of 51 dating events based on the past and future development of their own relationship (personal relationship script), and based on their conceptions of how relationships typically develop (normative relationship script). They then completed six measures of relationship well-being. Correspondence between personal and normative scripts, and agreement between partners on personal scripts, predicted several measures of relationship well-being for both sexes. Partner agreement on normative scripts was not important in this sample.
Acitelli, L. K. (1992). Gender differences in relationship awareness and marital satisfaction among young married couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 102-110.
2.
Acitelli, L. K. , Douvan, E., & Veroff, J. (1993). Perceptions of conflict in the first year of marriage: How important are similarity and understanding?Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 5-19.
3.
Ashforth, B. E. , & Fried, Y. (1988). The mindlessness of organizational behaviors. Human Relations, 41, 305-329.
4.
Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461-484.
5.
Battaglia, D. M. , Richard, F. D., Datteri, D. L., & Lord, C. G. (1998). Breaking up is (relatively) easy to do: A script for the dissolution of close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 829-845.
6.
Baxter, L. A. , & Wilmot, W. W. (1985). Taboo topics in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 253-269.
7.
Bower, G. H. , Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177-200.
8.
Cate, R. M. , Huston, T. L., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1986). Premarital relationships: Toward the identification of alternative pathways to marriage. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 3-22.
9.
Cate, R. M. , & Lloyd, S. A. (1992). Courtship. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
Davis, M. H. , & Oathout, H. A. (1987). Maintenance of satisfaction in romantic relationships: Empathy and relational competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 397-410.
11.
Fincham, F. D. , Beach, S. R. H., & Kemp-Fincham, S. I. (1997). Marital quality: A new theoretical perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & M. Hojjat (Eds.), Satisfaction in close relationships (pp. 275-306). New York: Guilford Press.
12.
Fletcher, G. J. O. , & Fitness, J. (1993). Knowledge structures and explanations in intimate relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.), Individuals in relationships (Vol. 1, pp. 121-143). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
Fletcher, G. J. O. , & Kininmonth, L. (1992). Measuring relationship beliefs: An individual differences scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 26, 371-397.
14.
Fletcher, G. J. O. , & Simpson, J. A. (2000). Ideal standards in close relationships: Their structure and functions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 102-105.
15.
Fletcher, G. J. O. , Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). Ideals, perceptions, and evaluations in early relationship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79,933-940.
16.
Fletcher, G. J. O. , Simpson, J. A., Thomas, G., & Giles, L. (1999). Ideals in intimate relation-ships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 72-89.
17.
Ginsburg, G. P. (1988). Rules, scripts and prototypes in personal relationships. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 23-39). Chichester: Wiley.
18.
Hatfield, E. (1988). Passionate and companionate love. In R. J. Sternberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 191-217). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
Holmberg, D. , Prosser, M., & Reeder, A. (2002). 'First comes love': Scripts for romantic relationship progression. Manuscript in preparation.
20.
Honeycutt, J. M. , Cantrill, J. G., & Allen, T. (1992). Memory structures for relational decay: A cognitive test of sequencing of de-escalating actions and stages. Human Communication Research, 18, 528-562.
21.
Honeycutt, J. M. , Cantrill, J. G., & Greene, R.W. (1989). Memory structures for relational escalation: A cognitive test of the sequencing of relational actions and stages. Human Communication Research, 16, 62-90.
22.
Kirk, R. E. (1984). Elementary statistics (2nd ed.). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
23.
Mongeau, P. A. , Carey, C. M., & Williams, M. L. M. (1998). First date initiation and enactment: An expectancy violation approach. In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigation of sex and gender in interaction (pp. 413-426). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24.
Murray, S. L. , Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1155-1180.
25.
Planalp, S. (1987). Interplay between relational knowledge and events. In R. Burnett, P. McGhee, & D. Clarke (Eds.), Accounting for relationships: Explanation, representation, and knowledge (pp. 175-191). London: Methuen.
26.
Pryor, J. B. , & Merluzzi, T. V. (1985). The role of expertise in processing social interaction scripts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 362-379.
27.
Rempel, J. K. , Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 95-112.
28.
Rose, S. , & Frieze, I. H. (1989). Young singles' scripts for a first date. Gender & Society, 3, 258-268.
29.
Rose, S. , & Frieze, I. H. (1993). Young singles' contemporary dating scripts. Sex Roles, 28, 499-509.
30.
Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101-117.
31.
Rusbult, C. E. , Onizuka, R. K., & Lipkus, I. (1993). What do we really want?: Mental models of ideal romantic involvement explored through multidimensional scaling. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 493-527.
32.
Sabatelli, R. M. (1988). Measurement issues in marital research: A review and critique of contemporary survey instruments. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 891-915.
33.
Schaefer, M. T. , & Olson, D. H. (1981). Assessing intimacy: The PAIR inventory. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 7, 47-60.
34.
Surra, C. A. (1985). Courtship types: Variations in interdependence between partners and social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 357-375.
35.
Surra, C. A. (1987). Reasons for changes in commitment: Variations by courtship style. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 17-33.
36.
Surra, C. A. , & Bohman, T. (1993). The development of close relationships: A cognitive perspective. In W. H. Jones & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 3, pp. 281-305). London: Jessica Kingsley.
37.
Thompson, M. M. , & Holmes, J. G. (1996). Ambivalence in close relationships: Conflicted cognitions as a catalyst for change. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 497-530). New York: Guilford Press.
38.
Van Lange, P. A. M. , Rusbult, C. E., Semin-Goossens, A., Goerts, C. A., & Stalpers, M. (1999). Being better than others but otherwise perfectly normal: Perceptions of uniqueness and similarity in close relationships. Personal Relationships, 6, 269-289.
39.
Veroff, J. , Douvan, E., & Hatchett, S. J. (1995). Marital instability: A social and behavioral study of the early years. Westport, CI: Greenwood.
40.
Whisman, M. A. (1997). Satisfaction in close relationships: Challenges for the 21st century. In R. J. Stemnberg & M. Hojjat (Eds.), Satisfaction in close relationships (pp. 385-410). New York: Guilford Press.
41.
Wilson, T. D. , & Capitman, J. A. (1982). Effects of script availability on social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 11-19.
