Research on Relationships as a Prelude to Action: Response to Commentaries

Abstract

I respond to the three commentaries offered by Reis (2002), Muehihoff and Wood (2002), and Hendrick (2002) in reaction to my article, Research on Relationships as a Prelude to Action. The central theme in the original article was that greater emphasis on research conducted with the goal of improving relationships would yield great dividends to relationship science, particularly by overcoming conceptual and methodological limitations now evident in the field. These three comments bring into focus several factors that may temper enthusiasm for a change-oriented research agenda, including uncertainty about which research findings ultimately will prove useful in devising interventions, value judgments associated with determining which kinds of changes and outcomes are desirable, and concerns that change oriented research will undermine theory development. I argue that these factors may limit acceptance and complicate implementation of a change-oriented research agenda, yet they do not diminish the importance of such an agenda or the benefits it is likely to produce.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bradbury, T. N. (1994). Unintended effects of marital research on marital relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 8,187-201.

Bradbury, T. N. (2002). Research on relationships as a prelude to action. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 571-599.

Floyd, F. J. , Markman, H. J. , Kelly, S. , Blumberg, S. L. , & Stanley, S. (1995). Preventive intervention and relationship enhancement. In N. S. Jacobsen & A. S. (Eds.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (pp. 212-226). New York: Guilford Press.

Gottman, J. M. , Notarius, C. , Markman, H. , Banks, S. , Yoppi, B. , & Rubin, M. (1976). Behavior exchange theory and marital decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 14-23.

Hendrick, C. (2002). A new age of prevention? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 621-627.

Howard, J. W. , & Dawes, R. M. (1976). Linear prediction of marital happiness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 478-480.

Markman, H. J. (1981). The prediction of marital distress: A five-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 760-762.

Medawar, P. B. (1979). Advice to a young scientist. New York: Harper & Row.

Muehlhoff, T. M. , & Wood, J. T. (2002). Speaking of marital communication: The marriage between theory and practice. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 613-619.

10.

Pasch, L. A. , & Bradbury, T. N. (1998). Social support, conflict, and the development of marital dysfunction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 219-230.

11.

Reis, H. T. (2002). Action matters, but relationship science is basic. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 601-611.

12.

Reis, H. T. , & Stiller, J. (1992). Publication trends in JPSP: A three-decade review. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 465-472.

13.

Rubin, Z. , & Mitchell, C. (1976). Couples research as couples counseling: Some unintended effects of studying close relationships. American Psychologist, 31, 17-25.

14.

Veroff, J. , Hatchett, S. , & Douvan, E. (1992). Consequences of participating in a longitudinal study of marriage. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 315-327.