This study looks at how three generations in Israeli families of Holocaust survivors work through the past. Fifty-seven people (23 survivors, 22 from the second generation, and 12 from the third) from 20 families told their life stories. The interviews were analyzed for central themes and values. For all generations, family relationships and the emotional difficulty of dealing with the Holocaust were important. The survivors emphasized family cohesiveness and unity, but distrusted nonfamily members. Their children emphasized conflictual family relationships; for them, working through was connected to interpersonal family relationships. The grandchildren stressed both close family ties and conflict, but also emphasized the importance of teaching younger generations about the Holocaust. It was concluded that the working through process poses different problems for each generation.
Aldous, J. , & Klein, D. M. (1988). The linkages between family development and family stress. In D. M. Klein & J. Aldous (Eds.), Social stress and family development (pp. 3-15). New York: Guilford Press.
2.
Allport, G. W. (1955). Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3.
Bales, R. F. (1988). Overview of the SYMLOG system: Measuring and changing behavior in groups. Woodland Hills, CA: SYMLOG Consulting Group.
4.
Bales, R. F. (1999). Social interaction systems: Theory and measurement. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
5.
Bales, R. F. , & Cohen, S. P. (1979) SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups. New York: Free Press.
6.
Bar-On, D. (1992). Israeli and German students encounter the Holocaust through a group process: `Working through' and `Partial Relevance'. International Journal of Group Tensions, 22(2), 81-118.
7.
Bar-On, D. (1995) Fear and hope: Three generations of the Holocaust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Bar-On, D. (1996). Studying the transgenerational after-effects of the Holocaust in Israel. Journal of Personal and Interpersonal Loss, 1, 215-247.
9.
Bar-On, D. (1999). Israeli society between the culture of death and the culture of life. In K. Nader, N. Dbrow, & B. H. Stamm (Eds.), Honoring differences: Cultural issues in the treatment of trauma and loss (pp. 211-233). Philadelphia, PA: Brunner/Mazel.
10.
Bar-On, D. (2000). The others within us. Jerusalem: Keter (in Hebrew).
11.
Bar-On, D. , Eland, J., Kleber, R. J., Krell, R., Moore, Y., Sagi, A., Soriano, E., Suedfeld, P., van der Velden, P., & van Ijzendoor, M. H. (1998). Multigenerational perspectives on coping with the Holocaust experience: An attachment perspective for understanding the developmental sequelae of trauma across generations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22(2), 315-338.
12.
Bar-On, D. , Hare, A. P., & Chaitin, J. (1997). Working through the consequences of the Holocaust in Israeli and German student seminars. In D. Bar-On, A. P. Hare, & K. Brendler (Eds.), Something in the roots went wrong: German and Israeli students confront the Holocaust and each other (pp. 21-49). Frankfurt: Campus Verlag. (In German)
13.
Bar-On, D. , & Selah, O. (1991). The `vicious cycle' between current social and political attitudes and attitudes towards the Holocaust among Israeli youngsters. Psychologia, 2(2), 126-138.
14.
Baracos, H. , & Barocas, C. (1973). Manifestations of concentration camp effects on the second generations. American Journal of Psychiatry, 130(7), 820-821.
15.
Bengtson, V. L. , & Allen, K. R. (1993). The Life Course Perspective applied to families over time. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 469-499). New York: Plenum Press.
16.
Berg-Cross, L. (1988). Basic concepts in family therapy. New York: Haworth Press.
17.
Bergmann, M. , & Jucovy, M. (1982). Generations of the Holocaust. New York: Basic Books.
18.
Boss, P. (1988). Family stress management. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
Boszormenyi-Nagy, I. , Grunebaum, J., & Ulrich, D. (1991). Contextual family therapy. In A. S. Gurman & D. P. Kniskern (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (pp. 200-238). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
20.
Chaitin, J. (1995). The relationship between working through the consequences of the Holocaust and group interaction in the third generation. Unpublished M.A. thesis.
21.
Chaitin, J. (2000a). Working the past into the present: Generations of families of survivors confront the Holocaust. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel.
22.
Chaitin, J. (2000b). Facing the Holocaust in generations of families of survivors: The case of Partial Relevance and interpersonal values. Contemporary Family Therapy, 22(3), 289-313.
23.
Crespi, T. D. (1993). SYMLOG: Clinical technology for therapist family of origin and family system appraisal. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 15(5), 369-380.
24.
Danieli, Y. (1981). Countertransference in the treatment and study of Nazi Holocaust survivors and their children. Victimology, 5, 45-53.
25.
Danieli, Y. (1988). The heterogeniety of post-war adaptation in families of Holocaust survivors. In R. L. Braham (Ed.), The psychological perspectives of the Holocaust and of its aftermath (pp. 109-127). Holocaust Studies Series. Boulder, CO:Social Science Monographs.
26.
Danieli, Y. (1998). International handbook of multigenerational legacies fo trauma. New York: Plenum Press.
27.
Elder, G. H. (1977). Family history and the life course. Journal of Family History, 2(4), 279-304.
28.
Elder, G. H. (1987). Families and lives: Some developments in life course studies. Journal of Family History, 12(1-3), 179-199.
29.
Felsen, I. (1998). Transgenerational transmission of effects of the Holocaust: The North American Research Perspective. In Y. Danieli (Ed.), International handbook of multigenerational legacies fo trauma (pp. 43-68). New York: Plenum Press.
30.
Germain, C. B. (1994). Emerging conceptions of family development over the life course. The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 42, 259-266.
31.
Handel, G. (1985). The psycho-social interior of the family. New York: Aldine Press.
32.
Hare, A. P. (1989). New field theory: SYMLOG research 1960-1988. Advances in Group Processes, 6, 229-257.
33.
Hare, A. P. , & Hare, S. E. (1998). SYMLOG field theory: Organizational consultation, value differences, personality and social perception. New York: Praeger.
34.
Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions. New York: Free Press.
35.
Juster, S. M. (1987). Changing perspectives on the American family in the past. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 193-216.
36.
Kestenberg, J. (1972). Psychoanalytic contributions to the problem of children of survivors from Nazi persecution. Israel Annals of Psychiatry and Related Disciplines, 10, 311-325.
37.
Kestenberg, J. (1980). Psychoanalysis of children of survivors from the Holocaust: Case presentation and assessment. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association28, 775-804.
38.
Kingsbury, N. , & Scanzoni, J. (1993). Structural-functionalism. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. K. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 195-217). New York: Plenum Press.
39.
Kroger, F. , Drinkmann, A., Herzog, W., & Petzold, E. (1991). Family diagnostics: Object representation in families with eating disorders. Small Group Research, 22(1), 99-114.
40.
Lifton, R. J. (1988). Understanding the traumatized self: Imagery, symbolization, and trans-formation. In J. P. Wilson & Z. Harel (Eds.), Human adaptation to extreme stress: From the Holocaust to Vietnam (pp. 7-31). New York: Plenum Press.
41.
Maccoby, E. E. , & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Socialization, personality and social development (Vol. IV, pp. 1-103). New York: Wiley.
42.
McCrae, R. R. , & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175-215.
43.
McDonald, G. W. , & Cornille, T. A. (1988). Internal family policy making and family problem solving: Toward a structural exchange model of family goal achievement. In D. M. Klein & J. Aldous (Eds.), Social stress and family development (pp. 246-263). New York: Guilford Press.
44.
Merlo, M. C. , Schwallbach, H., & Kroger, F. (1991). Changes in social perception during family therapy of young schizophrenics. Small Group Research, 22(1), 124-135.
45.
Moen, P. , & Howery, C. B. (1988). The significance of time in the study of families under stress. In D. M. Klein & J. Aldous (Eds.), Social stress and family development (pp. 131-156). New York: Guilford Press.
46.
Muncie, J. , Wetherell, M., Dallos, R., & Cochrane. J. (Eds.). (1995). Understanding the family. London: Sage.
47.
Neiderland, W. G. (1968). Clinical observations on the `Survivor Syndrome'. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 49, 313-315.
48.
Novey, S. (1962). The principal of `working through' in psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 10, 658-676.
49.
Prager, E. , & Solomon, Z. (1995). Perceptions of world benevolence, meaningfulness, and self-worth among elderly Israeli Holocaust survivors and non-survivors. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 8, 165-277.
50.
Rosenberg, S. , Nelson, C., & Vivekananthan, P. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283-294.
51.
Rosenthal, G. (1993). Reconstruction of life stories: Principles of selection in generating stories for narrative biographical interviews. In R. Josselson & A. Lieblich (Eds.), The narrative Study of Lives (Vol. 1, pp. 59-91). London: Sage.
52.
Rosenthal, G. (Ed.). (1998). The Holocaust in three generations: Families of victims and perpetrators of the Nazi regime. London: Kassel.
53.
Rossi, A. S. , & Rossi, P. H. (1990). Of human bonding: Parent-child relationships across the life course. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
54.
Rothstein, A. (1986). The reconstruction of trauma: Its significance in clinical work. New York: International Universities Press.
55.
Segev, T. (1993). The seventh million: The Israelis and the Holocaust. New York: Hill & Wang.
56.
Shafat, R. (1994). Commitment to parents as an unresolveable problem in children of Holocaust survivors. Sihot, 8, 23-27. (In Hebrew)
57.
Skolnick, A. S. & Skolnick, J. H. (1999). Family in transition. New York: Longman.
58.
Slonim-Nevo, V. , Chaitin, J., Sharaga, Y., & Abdelgani, A. (1998). Value patterns and content among families of Soviet immigrants: SYMLOG analysis. Family Process, 37(3), 345-361.
59.
Solomon, Z. (1995). From denial to recognition: Attitudes toward Holocaust survivors from World War II to the Present. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 8(2), 215-228.
60.
Solomon, Z. (1998). Transgenerational effects of the Holocaust. In Y. Danieli (Ed.), International handbook (pp. 69-83). New York: Plenum Press.
61.
Sonnenberg, S. M. (1974). Workshop report: Children of survivors. Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association, 22(1), 200-204.
62.
Volter, B. , & Dasberg, M. (1998). Similarities and differences in public discourse about the Shoah in Israel and West and East Germany. In G. Rosenthal (Ed.), The Holocaust in three generations: Families of victims and perpetrators of the Nazi regime (pp. 14-18). London: Cassell.
63.
Wardi, D. (1990). Memorial candles. Jerusalem: Keter. (In Hebrew)
