This study examines the impact of attachment style (i.e., secure, preoccupied, dismissing, and fearful-avoidant) on individuals' responses to accommodative dilemmas (i.e., exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect) across a variety of relationship types (n = 90 individuals). Contrary to hypotheses, prior to including: (a) constructiveness (constructive versus destructive), (b) activeness (active versus passive), and (c) relationship type (relationships with romantic partners, parents, and friends) as within-subject factors, and prior to controlling statistically for self-monitoring (or, more correctly, other-directedness), attachment style was not significant as a between-subjects factor. Also, contrary to predictions, after including constructiveness, activeness, and relationship type as within-subject factors, and after controlling statistically for other-directedness, the two-way interaction effect between attachment style and constructiveness was nonsignificant. However, a significant
four-way
interaction effect among attachment style, relationship type, constructiveness, and activeness emerged; results of planned comparisons revealed that attachment style was a significant predictor for one of the 12 dependent variables - namely, exit (an active, destructive response) in relationships with romantic partners. Unexpectedly, we also obtained a significant effect for other-directedness, such that other-directedness was: (a) a positive, marginal-to-significant covariate of passive (i.e., loyalty and neglect) responses, as well as (b) a negative, marginal-to-significant predictor of voice (an active, constructive response), across relationships in general.