Correlates of the Perceived Resolvability and Relational Consequences of Serial Arguing in Dating Relationships: Argumentative Features and the Use of Coping Strategies

Abstract

Sometimes partners do not resolve an argument in a single episode and engage each other in serial arguing as they repeatedly confront one another over the problem. This study concerns how features of argumentative episodes and coping strategies enacted between episodes are related to perceived resolvability and relational quality. A survey of undergraduates in dating relationships indicated that engaging in relationally confirming behavior during argumentative episodes and making optimistic relational comparisons between episodes were positively related to perceived resolvability and negatively related to relational harm arising from arguing. Although other argumentative features and coping strategies were sometimes related to resolvability and relational harm, relational confirmation and optimistic comparisons were more strongly associated with both.

Keywords

coping strategies dating interpersonal conflict serial arguing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Benoit, W. J. , & Benoit, P. J. (1987). Everyday argument practices of naive social actors. In J. W. Wentzel (Ed.), Argument and critical practices (pp. 465-473). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.

Berkowitz, L. (1962). Aggression: A social psychological analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Canary, D. J. , & Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59, 243-267.

Christensen, A. , & Sullaway, M. (1984). Communication Patterns Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.

Falbo, T. , & Peplau, L. A. (1980). Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 618-628.

Honeycutt, J. M. , Woods, B. L. , & Fontenot, K. (1993). The endorsement of communication conflict rules as a function of engagement, marriage and marital ideology. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 285-304.

Johnson, K. L. (1998). Serial arguments and relationship quality: An investigation of the antecedents and effects of resolution pessimism in premarital romantic dyads. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

Johnson, K. L. , & Roloff, M. E. (1998). Serial arguing and relational quality: Determinants and consequences of perceived resolvability. Communication Research, 25, 327-343.

Lakey, B. , Tardiff, T. A. , & Drew, J. B. (1994). Negative social interactions: Assessment and relations to social support, cognition and psychological distress. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 13, 42-62.

10.

Makoul, G. , & Roloff, M. E. (1998). The role of efficacy and outcome expectations in the decision to withhold relational complaints. Communication Research, 25, 5-29.

11.

McGonagle, K. A. , Kessler, R. C. , & Gotlib, I. H. (1993). The effects of marital disagreement style, frequency, and outcome on marital disruption. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 385-404.

12.

Menaghan, E. (1982). Measuring coping effectiveness: A panel analysis of marital problems and coping efforts. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 23, 220-234.

13.

Pruitt, D. G. , Parker, J. C. , & Mikolic, J. M. (1997). Escalation as a reaction to persistent annoyance. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 8, 252-270.

14.

Stafford, L. , & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 217-242.

15.

Stutman, R. K. , & Newell, S. E. (1990). Rehearsing for confrontation. Argumentation, 4, 185-198.

16.

Trapp, R. , & Hoff, N. (1985). A model of serial argument in interpersonal relationships. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 22, 1-11.

17.

Walker, L. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer.