This paper describes a number of experiments done during the past nine years on the perception and the immediate memory of braille symbols and on learning the names for such symbols. Some possible implications of the results for the design of braille instructional programmes and for further research are discussed.
Caton, H., Pester, E. and Goldblatt, S. (1979), Specifications for selecting vocabulary and teaching methods for beginning braille readers. New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
3.
Foulke, E. (1982), Reading braille, in W. Schiff and E. Foulke (Eds.), Tactual perception: A sourcebook, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Harley, R.K., Henderson, F.M. and Truan, M.B. (1979), The teaching of braille reading, Springfield, IL: C.C. Thomas.
5.
Loomis, J.N. and Lederman, S.J. (1986), Tactual perception, in N. Boff, L. Kaufman and J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance.
6.
Lorimer, P. (1982), The braille code and the teaching of braille reading, an annotated bibliography, London: Royal National Institute for the Blind.
7.
Newman, S.E., Craig, R.D. and Hall, A.D. (1985a, March), Some factors affecting numerosity judgments in haptically-examined braille symbols, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, MA.
8.
Newman, S.E., Craig, R.D. and Hall, A.D. (1985b, November), Judgments of dot numerosity. Effects of three variables, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, MA.
9.
Newman, S.E., Craig, R.D. and Hall, A.D. (1986, March), Judgment of dot numerosity in braille symbols by blind and sighted subjects, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Orlando, FL.
10.
Newman, S.E., Hall, A.D., Foster, D.L. and Gupta, V.G. (1984), Learning as a function of haptic discriminabihty among items, American Journal of Psychology, 97, 359-372.
11.
Newman, S.E., Hall, A.D. and Gupta, V.G. (1983, November), Immediate memory for visually and haptically examined braille symbols, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Diego, CA .
12.
Newman, S.E., Hall, A.D., Ramseur, C.J., Foster, D.L., Goldston, D.B., DeCamp, B.L., Granberry-Hager, S.P. , Lockhart, J.L., Sawyer , W.L. and White, J.E., II (1982), Factors affecting the learning of braille, Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 76, 59-64.
13.
Newman, S.E., Kindsvater, M.B. and Hall, A.D. (1985), Braille learning: Effects of symbol size, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Soctety, 32, 189-190.
14.
Newman, S.E., Sawyer, W.L., Hall, A.D. and Hill, L.G.J. (1981, November), Braille learning One modality is sometimes better than two, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia, PA.
15.
Olson, M.R. (1981), Guidelines for games for teaching efficient braille reading, New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
16.
Thomson, D.M. and Tulving, E. (1970), Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 255-262.
17.
Tobin, M.J. (1971), Programmed instruction and braille learning, Birmingham, England: Research Centre for the Education of the Visually Handicapped.
18.
Tulving, E. (1979), Relation between encoding specificity and levels of processing, in L.S. Cermak and F.I.M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
Tulving, E. and Thomson, D.M. (1973), Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory, Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
