Abstract
The problem of assessing a client's needs in respect of mobility training is a crucial one for MOs. This paper examines the ways in which assessment is undertaken. MOs use three sorts of data to arrive at their judgements — observational, interpersonal and clinical. The results of four experiments show that these data are unreliable and are probably also invalid measures of mobility performance. The value o f the largely subjective methods currently used in assessment is questioned, as is the lack of explicit awareness of an effective assessment methodology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
