Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In the Netherlands, access to deafblind-specific rehabilitation and education is often based on medical definitions for vision impairment and for hearing loss. However, not everyone with deafblindness (DB) meets these definitions because DB is not solely a result of limitations in bodily functions and structures, but also of limitations in daily functioning. Therefore, using a functional definition that describes a disability in terms of its impact on daily functioning, alongside the medical definitions, would be better suited for determining who needs access to deafblind-specific support. However, such a definition did not yet exist in the Netherlands. To develop a functional definition of DB, consensus among experts (experts-with-lived-experience and experts-with-working-experience) on how to define DB was needed. To investigate the consensus of experts, a Delphi study was conducted, in which 45 Dutch experts participated. The study consisted of a questionnaire with 30 multiple-choice statements on eight topics related to defining DB. After three rounds, consensus was reached on 24 of the 30 multiple-choice statements. These results were used in a follow-up process in which the Dutch functional definition of DB was developed.

Keywords

Consensus deafblindness Delphi study experts-by-lived-experience experts-by-working-experience functional definition medical criteria medical definition vision and hearing impairment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anthony

T. L.

(2016). Early identification of infants and toddlers with deafblindness. American Annals of the Deaf, 161(4), 412–423. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2016.0034

Avella

J. R.

(2016). Delphi panels: Research design, procedures, advantages, and challenges. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 305–321. https://doi.org/10.28945/3561

Bell

Prain

Layton

(2023). Assistive technology for people with deafblindness in southern Africa: A Delphi study exploring dimensions of impact. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 18(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2021.1994031

Bright

Ramke

Zhang

J. H.

Kitema

G. F.

Safi

Mdala

Yoshizaki

Brennan-Jones

C. B.

Mactaggart

Gordon

Swenor

B. K.

Burton

M. J.

Evans

J. R.

(2023). Prevalence and impact of combined vision and hearing (dual sensory) impairment: A scoping review. PLOS Global Public Health, 3(5), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001905

Cantin

de Abreu Cybis

Durocher

(2022). Setup by a person with deafblindness of a face-to-face communication assistive technology based on generally available applications. Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 17(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1751315

Centre for Welfare and Social Issues. (2016). The Nordic definition of deafblindness. https://nordicwelfare.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/nordic-definition-of-deafblindness.pdf

Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment–companion volume. www.coe.int/lang-cefr

Dammeyer

(2010). Prevalence and aetiology of congenitally deafblind people in Denmark. International Journal of Audiology, 49(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992020903311388

Dammeyer

(2014). Deafblindness: A review of the literature. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 42(7), 554–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494814544399

10.

Dammeyer

(2015). Deafblindness and dual sensory loss research: Current status and future directions. World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 5(2), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.5319/wjo.v5.i2.37

11.

Danermark

B. D.

Möller

(2008). Deafblindness, ontological security, and social recognition. International Journal of Audiology, 47(Suppl. 2), S119–S123. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020802307388

12.

Deafblind International. (n.d.). Developing a new Nordic definition of deafblindness. https://www.deafblindinternational.org

13.

European Parliament. (2004). Declaration on the rights of deafblind people. europa.eu

14.

Field

(2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage.

15.

Glaser

B. G.

Strauss

A. L.

Strutzel

(1968). The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nursing Research, 17(4), 364.

16.

Hasson

Keeney

McKenna

(2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008–1015. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x

17.

Heppe

Bak

Bekendam

Bootsma

Damen

Eikelboom

Jagersma

Klomp

Leefkens

Meijs

van Mil

van de Molengraft

van Nunen

Roelofs

van der Spek

Witsiers

Worm

(2021). The Dutch functional definition of deafblindness–English translation. Deelkracht & Kennis over Zien, 2021. https://www.deelkracht.nl/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/The-Dutch-Functional-Definition-of-Deafblindness-%E2%80%93-English-translation-.pdf

18.

Hoevenaars-van den Boom

M. A. A.

Antonissen

A. C. F. M.

Knoors

Vervloed

M. P. J

. (2009). Differentiating characteristics of deafblindness and autism in people with congenital deafblindness and profound intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53(6), 548–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01175.x

19.

Hsu

C. C.

Sandford

B. A.

(2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.7275/pdz9-th90

20.

Jaiswal

Aldersey

H. M.

Wittich

Mirza

Finlayson

(2019). Using the ICF to identify contextual factors that influence participation of persons with deafblindness. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 100(12), 2324–2333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.03.010

21.

Jaiswal

Paramasivam

Budhiraja

Santhakumaran

Gravel

Martin

Ogedengbe

T. O.

James

T. G.

Kenedy

Tang

Tran

Colson-Osborne

Minhas

Granberg

Wittich

(2024). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core sets for deafblindness, part II of the systematic review: Linking data to the ICF categories. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 60(5), 893–902. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.24.07984-X

22.

Kim

H. Y.

(2017). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Chi-squared test and Fisher’s Exact Test. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 42(2), 152–155. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.152

23.

Larsen

F. A.

Damen

(2014). Definitions of deafblindness and congenital deafblindness. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(10), 2568–2576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.05.029

24.

Larsen

F. A.

Dammeyer

(2021). The relation between sensory loss and communicative and cognitive development in children with congenital deafblindness. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 39(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619620913901

25.

Linstone

H. A.

Turoff

(Eds.). (1975). The Delphi method (pp. 3–12). Addison-Wesley.

26.

Meekins-Doherty

Prain

Elise Maxwell

Silveira

Shepard

(2025). Exploring methodologies for establishing prevalence of deafblindness in children: A scoping review. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 43(1), 120–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196231212830

27.

Metzelthin

S. F.

Rostgaard

Parsons

Burton

(2022). Development of an internationally accepted definition of reablement: A Delphi study. Ageing & Society, 42(3), 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X20000999

28.

Minhas

Jaiswal

Chan

Trevisan

Paramasivam

Spruyt-Rocks

(2022). Prevalence of individuals with deafblindness and age-related dual-sensory loss. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 116(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X211072541

29.

Nasa

Jain

Juneja

(2021). Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness. World Journal of Methodology, 11(4), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116

30.

Nelson

Bruce

S. M.

(2016). Critical issues in the lives of children and youth who are deafblind. American Annals of the Deaf, 161(4), 406–411. https://www.jstor.org/stableTable/26235291

31.

Niederberger

Spranger

(2020). Delphi technique in health sciences: A map. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, Article 457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457

32.

Paramasivam

Jaiswal

Minhas

Wittich

Spruyt-Rocks

(2021). Informed consent or assent strategies for research with individuals with deafblindness or dual sensory impairment: A scoping review. Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation, 3, 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100115

33.

Ravenscroft

Damen

(2019). Editorial. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 37(2), 77–80.

34.

Simcock

Wittich

(2019). Are older deafblind people being left behind? A narrative review of literature on deafblindness through the lens of the United Nations Principles for Older People. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 41(3), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2019.1627088

35.

Swedo

S. E.

Baguley

D. M.

Denys

Dixon

L. J.

Erfanian

Fioretti

Jastreboff

P. J.

Kumar

Rosenthal

M. Z.

Rouw

Schiller

Simner

Storch

E. A.

Taylor

Vander Werff

K. R.

Altimus

C. M.

Raver

S. M.

(2022). Consensus definition of misophonia: A Delphi study. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, Article 841816. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.841816

36.

Wittich

Boie

N. R.

Jaiswal

(2023). Methodological approaches to obtaining informed consent when conducting research with individuals with deafblindness. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205176

37.

Wittich

Dumassais

Jaiswal

Paramasivam

Budhiraja

Lopez

Granberg

(2024). Development of Core Sets for deafblindness: An international expert survey on functioning and disability of individuals living with deafblindness using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 60(2), 382–390. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08188-7

38.

Wittich

Dumassais

Prain

Ogedengbe

T. O.

Gravel

Jaiswal

Minhas

Lopez

Granberg

(2024). Development of core sets for deafblindness using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: The perspectives of individuals with lived experience. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 20(2), 382–390. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08500-9

39.

Wittich

Jarry

Groulx

Southall

Gagné

J. P.

(2016). Rehabilitation and research priorities in deafblindness for the next decade. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 110(4), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1611000402

40.

Wittich

Southall

Sikora

Watanabe

D. H.

Gagné

J. P.

(2013). What’s in a name: Dual sensory impairment or deafblindness? British Journal of Visual Impairment, 31(3), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619613490519

41.

World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability, and health: ICF.

Consensus on topics related to defining the functional definition of deafblindness in the Netherlands: A Delphi study

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References