Lived experiences of students with blindness in Orientation and Mobility (O&M) skills at Haramaya University,Ethiopia: A phenomenological study

Abstract

Orientation involves understanding or comprehending the location of the desired destination, while mobility pertains to safe and efficient movement within the environment. This study examines the life experiences of students with blindness at Haramaya University, Ethiopia, in learning and using Orientation and Mobility (O&M) skills. The research used a descriptive phenomenological design, with five participants purposively chosen based on their severity of vision loss and willingness. Based on the findings, three main themes emerged: formal learning and use, informal learning and use, and absence of learning and non-use. The study recommends appropriate teaching aids and techniques to improve O&M skills for individuals with blindness and to enhance the lives of individuals with blindness.

Keywords

Ethiopia lived experiences mobility orientation students with blindness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altunay Arslantekin

. (2017). Evaluation of the level of students with visual impairments in Turkey in terms of the concepts of mobility prerequisites (Body plane/traffic). Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 17(67), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.67.5

Ambrose-Zaken

(2022). A study of improving independent walking outcomes in children who are blind or have low vision aged 5 years and younger. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 116(4), 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x221121824

Ayton

(n.d.). Chapter, 6. Phenomenology. https://oercollective.caul.edu.au/qualitative-research/chapter/__unknown__-6/

Chamberlain

M.-N.

(2013). Orientation and mobility: One instructor’s perspective. https://nfb.org/sites/default/files/images/nfb/publications/fr/fr32/3/fr320309.htm

Chamberlain

M.-N.

(2017). Teachable moments how parents of blind and visually impaired children can reinforce lessons in orientation and mobility. Future Reflections, 36. https://nfb.org/sites/default/files/images/nfb/publications/fr/fr36/1/fr360106.htm

Chan

Z. C. Y.

Fung

Y.-l.

Chien

W,-t

. (2013). Bracketing in phenomenology: Only undertaken in the data collection and analysis process. The Qualitative Report, 18(30), 1–9.

Christine Clark-Bischke

S. M. K

. (2011). Orientation and mobility. Routledge.

Çimen

Kılınç

A. Ç.

Bektas

Karadag

Yalcin

(2020). Misconceptions in phenomenological research in educational administration: An analysis based on theses. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership, 5(1), 139–196. https://doi.org/10.30828/real/2020.1.5

Cmar

J. L.

(2015). Orientation and mobility skills and outcome expectations as predictors of employment for young adults with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 109(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x1510900205

10.

Creswell

J. W.

Creswell

J. D.

(2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage. https://lccn.loc.gov/2017044644

11.

Dewald

H. P.

Faris

Borg

K. S.

Maner

Martinez-Cargo

Carter

. (2015). Expanding the frontiers of orientation and mobility for infants and toddlers in New Mexico and Utah. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 109(6), 502–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1510900608

12.

Deverell

Bhowmik

Lau

B. T.

Al Mahmud

Sukunesan

Islam

F. M. A.

McCarthy

Meyer

(2022). Use of technology by orientation and mobility professionals in Australia and Malaysia before COVID-19. Disability Rehabilitation Assistive Technlogy, 17(3), 260–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1785565

13.

Deverell

Bradley

Foote

Bowden

Meyer

(2019). Measuring the benefits of guide dog mobility with the Orientation and Mobility Outcomes (OMO) tool. Anthrozoös, 32(6), 741–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2019.1673036

14.

Drickvand

Movallali

Sajedi

. (2015). The effectiveness of a mobility and orientation training program on static and dynamic balance skills of children with visual impairment. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 1(4), 13–17.

15.

Fast

Wild

(2018). Teaching science through inquiry-based field experiences using orientation and mobility. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities, 21(1), 29–39.

16.

Fikadu

Kebede

Kant

(2023). Entrepreneurship orientation to nurture the halal food industry future in Ethiopia. Journal of Islamic Economic and Business Research, 3(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.18196/jiebr.v3i1.99

17.

Ghebru

Lloyd

(2020). From civic to citizenship education: Toward a stronger citizenship orientation in the Ethiopian CEE curriculum. International Journal of Educational Development, 72, 102143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102143

18.

Griffin-Shirley

Bozeman

Obiero

N. A.

Steinle

K. J.

Page

(2019). Preparation of orientation and mobility specialist students who are blind and have low vision: Survey of faculty who teach blindfold and simulation cane courses. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 113(4), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x19865382

19.

Griffin-Shirley

Bozeman

Okungu

Ihenagwam

Nguyen

(2023). Teaching strategies and nonvisual skills used by orientation and mobility specialists who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 117(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x221150013

20.

Idawati

Siti

Bachri

B. S.

(2020). Application of learning mobility orientation on social skill of blind children. Journal of Education and Learning, 9, 196–204.

21.

Kamali

Ashori

(2021). The effectiveness of orientation and mobility training on the quality of life for students who are blind in Iran. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 41(1), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196211019066

22.

Kana

F. Y.

Golga

D. N.

(2023). Lived experiences of students with blindness learning and using Braille at Haramaya University in Ethiopia. British Journal of Visual Impairment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196231195699

23.

Khatri

K. K.

(2020). Research paradigm: A philosophy of educational research. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 5(5), 1435–1440. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.55.15

24.

Kircher-Herring

(2015). Contradictory instruction of orientation and mobility within Virginia’s schools. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 109(5), 396–401.

25.

Lahav

Schloerb

Srinivasan

M. A.

(2015). Virtual environments for people who are visually impaired integrated into an orientation and mobility program. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 109(1), 5–17.

26.

Lauren Thévin

C. B.

Brock

A. M

. (2020). X-road: Virtual reality glasses for orientation and mobility training of people with visual impairments. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS), 13(2), 1–47. https://doi.org/0000001.0000001

27.

Malik

Abdul Manaf

U. K.

(2020). Orientation and mobility practices within the expanded core curriculum with effective parental involvement of visually impaired learners in Pakistan. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42, 199–219.

28.

Malik

Abdul Manaf

U. K.

Ahmad

N. A.

Ismail

(2018). Orientation and mobility training in special education curriculum for social adjustment problems of visually impaired children in Pakistan. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11213a

29.

Massa

(2020). Borders and boundaries as resources for mobility. Multiple regimes of mobility and incoherent trajectories on the Ethiopian-Eritrean border. Geoforum, 116, 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.01.007

30.

Mohamed

(2022). Contending with the unforeseen “messiness” of the qualitative data analysis process. Waikato Journal of Education, 27(2), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v27i2.945

31.

ÖZer ŞAnal

Erdem

. (2022). Examination of special education with constructivism: A theoretical and review study. The European Educational Researcher, 6(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.611

32.

Santos

A. D. P. D.

Suzuki

A. H. G.

Medola

F. O.

Vaezipour

(2021). A systematic review of wearable devices for orientation and mobility of adults with visual impairment and blindness. IEEE Access, 9, 162306–162324. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3132887

33.

Schewel

Asmamaw

L. B.

(2021). Migration and development in Ethiopia: Exploring the mechanisms behind an emerging mobility transition. Migration Studies, 9(4), 1673–1707. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnab036

34.

Szabó

Csépes

(2023). Constructivism in language pedagogy. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 13(3), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1556/063.2022.00136

35.

Tellefson

M. J.

Koehler

W. S.

Botsford

K. D.

Cook

(2019). Orientation and mobility career, college, and community readiness standards: A Delphi study. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 113(3), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x19851296

36.

Ulz

(2023, March 20). What is a research paradigm? Types of research paradigms with examples. https://researcher.life/blog/article/what-is-a-research-paradigm-types-examples/

37.

Wolski

(2018). The history of the development and propagation of QDA software. The Qualitative Report, 23(13), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.2984

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB