This article examines the description of race in the audio description (AD) of Netflix through the lens of political correctness to determine any bias, whether intentional or not. It analyzes the wording of English AD incidents where characters are described in several series and films available on Netflix. Passing, Kipo, and Squid Game were selected because their cast and characters were diverse or consisted mainly of minorities. The findings showed that although Netflix aims to minimize bias in the AD provided on its platform, some subtle biases are still present; some of these may even be unintentional. When it comes to labels, no offensive terms were ever used; however, some efforts to avoid offensive language resulted in the descriptions being too ambiguous. The study concludes that since language cannot be separated from its pragmatics, the choice in wording can create a problematic area for the scriptwriter.
BakerP.PottsA. (2013). “Why do white people have thin lips?” Google and the perpetuation of stereotypes via auto-complete search forms. Critical Discourse Studies, 10(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.744320
2.
BeamanJ.PettsA. (2020). Towards a global theory of colorblindness: Comparing colorblind racial ideology in France and the United States. Sociology Compass, 14(4), e12774. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12774
3.
BittnerH. (2012). Audio description guidelines: A comparison. In BittnerH. (Ed.), New perspectives in translation (Vol. 20, pp. 41–61). Routledge.
4.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2015). More than prejudice: Restatement, reflections, and new directions in critical race theory. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 1(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649214557042
5.
BraunS. (2008). Audiodescription research: State of the art and beyond. Translation Studies in the New Millennium, 6(1), 14–30.
6.
ClaveroM. P. O.RipollA. M. M.MatamalaA.OreroP. (2013). Standarising audio description. Italian Journal of Special Education for Inclusion, 1(1), 149–155.
7.
CoronelJ. L. (2022). 42 societal othering of Asian Americans and its perpetuation through casting. In GintherA. M. (Ed.), Stages of reckoning: Antiracist decolonial and actor training (pp. 42–59). Routledge.
8.
DarwishN. T.HaiderA. S.SaedH. (2022). Views of visually-impaired Jordanians on the Netflix Arabic audio description service. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 57(6), 816–828. https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.57.6.71
9.
DarwishN. T.HaiderA. S.SaedH. (2023). Aspects of visual content covered in the audio description of Arabic series: A corpus-assisted study. Open Cultural Studies, 7(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2022-0174
10.
Ellis-HerveyN.DossA.DavisD.NicksR.AraizaP. (2016). African American personal presentation: Psychology of hair and self-perception. Journal of Black Studies, 47(8), 869–882. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934716653350
11.
FelicianoC. (2016). Shades of race: How phenotype and observer characteristics shape racial classification. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(4), 390–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215613401
12.
FresnoN.CastellàJ.Soler-VilageliuO. (2016). “What should I say?” Tentative criteria to prioritize information in the audio description of film characters. In GrecoG. M.MatamalaA.OreroP.. (Eds.), Researching audio description: New approaches (pp. 143–167). Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
FryerL. (2016). An introduction to audio description: A practical guide. Routledge.
14.
GzaraN. (2021, June 29–July 4). Audio description and ethnicity [Paper presentation]. 3rd Swiss Conference on Barrier-free Communication (BfC 2020), Online, Winterthur, Switzerland.
MazurI. (2020). Audio description: Concepts, theories and research approaches. In BoguckiŁ.DeckertM. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of audiovisual translation and media accessibility (pp. 227–247). Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
MazurI.ChmielA. (2021). Audio description training: A snapshot of the current practices. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 15(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399x.2021.1880263
19.
McGuireC. L. (2022). White teachers’ talk about race talk: Discursive strategies of Whiteness and color-blind racism [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Pittsburgh.
20.
MershaT. B.AbebeT. (2015). Self-reported race/ethnicity in the age of genomic research: Its potential impact on understanding health disparities. Human Genomics, 9, Article 1.
21.
MeyersC.GaitherS. E.RemediosJ.PaukerK. (2023). Detecting biracial identity strength: Perceived phenotypicality is inaccurate. Self and Identity, 22(4), 533–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2022.2146742
22.
Minikel-LacocqueJ. (2013). Racism, college, and the power of words: Racial microaggressions reconsidered. American Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 432–465. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212468048
23.
NevilleH. A.GallardoM. E.SueD. W. E. (2016). Introduction: Has the United States really moved beyond race? In NevilleH. A.GallardoM. E.SueD. W. E. (Eds.), The myth of racial color blindness: Manifestations, dynamics, and impact (pp. 3–21). American Psychological Association.
24.
NhienC. (2022). Dismantling the Asian monolith: Examining Southeast Asian students’ science self-efficacy and science identity. University of California.
25.
PaukerK.MeyersC.SanchezD. T.GaitherS. E.YoungD. M. (2018). A review of multiracial malleability: Identity, categorization, and shifting racial attitudes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(6), e12392. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12392
26.
PozoM.d. M. O. (2022). Into the shoes of visually impaired viewers: A pedagogical experiment to improve audio description and english language skills. International Journal for 21st Century Education, 9(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.21071/ij21ce.v9i1.15169
27.
RaiS.GreeningJ.PetréL. (2010). A comparative study of audio description guidelines prevalent in different countries. Royal National Institute of Blind People.
28.
RemaelA.ReviersN.VercauterenG. (2015). Pictures painted in words: ADLAB audio description guidelines. Edizioni Università di Trieste.
29.
RhodesM.LeslieS. J.BianchiL.ChalikL. (2018). The role of generic language in the early development of social categorization. Child Development, 89(1), 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12714
30.
Romero-FrescoP.FryerL. (2013). Could audio-described films benefit from audio introductions? An audience response study. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 107(4), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x1310700405
31.
SnyderJ. (2020). The visual made verbal: A comprehensive training manual and guide to the history and applications of audio description. Æ Academic Publishing.
32.
SolorzanoD.CejaM.YossoT. (2000). Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African American college students. Journal of Negro Education, 69(1–2), 60–73.
33.
SueD. W. (2010). Microaggressions and marginality: Manifestation, dynamics, and impact. John Wiley.
34.
UrciuoliB. (2020). Racializing, ethnicizing, and diversity discourses. In AlimH. S.ReyesA.KroskrityP. V. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and race (pp. 108–127). Oxford University Press.
35.
WilliamsM. T.SkintaM. D.Martin-WillettR. (2021). After Pierce and Sue: A revised racial microaggressions taxonomy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(5), 991–1007. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691621994247
