The pilot survey presented herein explores the possibilities given by three-dimensional (3D)-printed maps to students with visual impairment (VI) for learning the spatial distribution of geographic phenomena. The main research questions are: (a) whether students with VI can perceive two phenomena depicted on the same 3D-printed map and (b) whether they perform better when interacting with individual tactile maps for each spatial phenomenon than when interacting with a single 3D-printed map displaying the two spatial phenomena simultaneously. Our analysis indicates that 3D-printed maps can be a valuable alternative for the education of students with VI even when they represent two spatial phenomena simultaneously.
BangorA.KortumP. T.MillerJ. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 24(6), 574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776
BrockA.TruilletP.OriolaB.PicardD.JouffraisC. (2012). Design and user satisfaction of interactive maps for visually impaired people. In MiesenbergerK.KarshmerA.PenazP.ZaglerW. (Eds.), Computers helping people with special needs [ICCHP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science] (Vol. 7383). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31534-3_80
FrøkjærE.HertzumM.HornbækK. (2000). Measuring usability: Are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated? In CHI letters, proceedings of CHI (Vol. 2, No.1, pp. 345–352). Association for Computing Machinery.
9.
GriffinA. L. (2001). Feeling it out: The use of haptic visualization for exploratory geographic analysis. Cartographic Perspectives, 39, 12–29. https://doi.org/10.14714/CP39.636
10.
GualJ.PuyueloM.LloverasJ. (2014). Three-dimensional tactile symbols produced by 3D printing: Improving the process of memorizing a tactile map key. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 32(3), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619614540291
11.
GualJ.PuyueloM.LloverasJ. (2015). Improving tactile map usability through 3D printing techniques: An experiment with new tactile symbols. The Cartographic Journal, 52(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743277413Y.0000000046
12.
ISO 9241-11:2018 (2018). Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts (ISO/TC 159/SC 4).
LawrenceM. M.LobbenA. K. (2011). The design of tactile thematic symbols. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105(10), 681–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1110501014
15.
NolanC. Y.MorrisJ. E. (1971). Improvement of tactual symbols for blind children: Final report (Project No. 5-0421; Grant No. OEG-32-27-0000-1012). Louisville, Ky: American Printing House for the Blind (ERIC No. ED 070 228).
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
19.
ŠtěrbaZ.ŠašinkaČ.StachoňZ.ŠtampachR.MorongK. (2015). Selected issues of experimental testing in cartography (1 Vyd.). Brno: Masaryk University.
20.
TathamA. F. (1991). The design of tactile maps: Theoretical and practical considerations. Proceedings of 15th ICA Conference, Bournemouth.
21.
VasconcellosR. (1991). Knowing the Amazon through tactual graphics. Proceedings of 15th ICA Conference, Bournemouth.
22.
VasconcellosR. (1993). Representing the geographical space for visually handicapped students: A case study on map use. Proceedings of the 16th ICA Conference, Cologne, Germany.
23.
VoženílekV.VondrákováA. (2015). Tactile maps based on 3d printing technology. SOCIETY, INTEGRATION, EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2014vol3.732
24.
WickhamH.AverickM.BryanJ.ChangW.McGowanL. D.FrançoisR.GrolemundG.HayesA.HenryL.HesterJ.KuhnM.PedersenT. L.MillerE.BacheS. M.MüllerK.OomsJ.RobinsonD.SeidelD. P.SpinuV.YutaniH. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open-source Software, 4(43), 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
