Neuropsychological assessment tools for individuals with blindness are relatively scarce. In the current study, we assessed the validity of the Tactual Span, a task aimed at evaluating tactile working memory. During the task, the fingers of both hands are touched in specific sequences of ascending difficulty, which participants are asked to repeat in exact and reverse order. Twelve participants with congenital blindness and 13 with acquired blindness were examined alongside 18 sighted controls, matched to the experimental group with respect to age and education. Participants performed the Tactual Span and three additional tasks assessing working memory in the auditory modality, as well as a Semantic Fluency test. Results showed that the Tactual Span was significantly correlated with most of the other working memory measures, in all groups, but not with the Semantic Fluency test. In addition, the congenital and acquired blindness groups performed similarly to one another and better than sighted controls on most working memory tasks, but not on the Semantic Fluency test. Findings suggest that the Tactual Span is a feasible task for measuring tactile working memory in individuals with congenital and acquired blindness. Therefore, it can expand the cognitive assessment toolbox of professionals working with blind individuals and increase the strength of conclusions drawn from cognitive assessments in educational and vocational settings.
BlissI.KujalaT.HämäläinenH. (2004). Comparison of blind and sighted participants’ performance in a letter recognition working memory task. Cognitive Brain Research, 18(3), 273–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.012
8.
BurtonH.SinclairR. J.DixitS. (2010). Working memory for vibrotactile frequencies: Comparison of cortical activity in blind and sighted individuals. Human Brain Mapping, 31(11), 1686–1701. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20966
9.
CattaneoZ.VecchiT. (2008). Supramodality effects in visual and haptic spatial processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 34(3), 631–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.631
10.
CattaneoZ.VecchiT.CornoldiC.MammarellaI.BoninoD.RicciardiE.PietriniP. (2008). Imagery and spatial processes in blindness and visual impairment. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32(8), 1346–1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.05.002
11.
ChenM. S.HuangC. K.WangC. N. (2010). Working memory for spatial construction in blind and sighted individuals. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 27(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/10170660903546723
12.
CimeraR. E.RumrillP. D.ChanF.KayaC.BezyakJ. (2015). Vocational rehabilitation services and outcomes for transition-age youth with visual impairments and blindness. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 43(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-150760
13.
CohenH.ScherzerP.ViauR.VossP.LeporeF. (2011). Working memory for Braille is shaped by experience. Communicative and Integrative Biology, 4(2), 227–229. https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.4.2.14546
CornoldiC.CortesiA.PretiD. (1991). Individual differences in the capacity limitations of visuospatial short-term memory: Research on sighted and totally congenitally blind people. Memory & Cognition, 19(5), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199569
16.
CornoldiC.TintiC.MammarellaI. C.ReA. M.VarottoD. (2009). Memory for an imagined pathway and strategy effects in sighted and in totally congenitally blind individuals. Acta Psychologica, 130(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.012
17.
CornoldiC.VecchiT. (2004). Imagery, blindness, and visuo-spatial working memory. In CornoldiC.VecchiT. (Eds.), Visuo-spatial working memory and individual differences (pp. 95–106). Psychology Press.
18.
CowanN. (2005). Working memory capacity. Psychology Press.
19.
DormalV.CrollenV.BaumansC.LeporeF.CollignonO. (2016). Early but not late blindness leads to enhanced arithmetic and working memory abilities. Cortex, 83, 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.07.016
20.
EngleR. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00160
21.
FanX.ThompsonB.WangL. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 56–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540119
22.
FernandesA. M.AlbuquerqueP. B. (2012). Tactual perception: A review of experimental variables and procedures. Cognitive Processing, 13(4), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0443-2
GogulskiJ.ZetterR.NyrhinenM.PertovaaraA.CarlsonS. (2017). Neural substrate for metacognitive accuracy of tactile working memory. Cerebral Cortex, 27(11), 5343–5352. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx219
25.
HarrisJ. A.MiniussiC.HarrisI. M.DiamondM. E. (2002). Transient storage of a tactile memory trace in primary somatosensory cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 22(19), 8720–8725. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-19-08720.2002
26.
HeledE.RotbergS.YavichR.HoofienA. D. (2020). Introducing the Tactual Span: A new task for assessing working memory in the Teactile Modality. Assessment, 28(3), 1018–1031. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120949929
27.
JohnsonL. L.KellyS. (2020). Student predispositions as predictors of dissent behaviors in supply chain courses. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 18(2), 270–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12201
28.
KaasA. L.van MierH.VisserM.GoebelR. (2013). The neural substrate for working memory of tactile surface texture. Human Brain Mapping, 34(5), 1148–1162. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21500
29.
KärnekullS. C.ArshamianA.NilssonM. E.LarssonM. (2016). From perception to metacognition: Auditory and olfactory functions in early blind, late blind, and sighted individuals. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1450. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01450
30.
KatusT.MüllerM. M.EimerM. (2015). Sustained maintenance of somatotopic information in brain regions recruited by tactile working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(4), 1390–1395. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3535-14.2015
31.
KavéG.Knafo-NoamA. (2015). Lifespan development of phonemic and semantic fluency: Universal increase, differential decrease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 37(7), 751–763. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2015.1065958
LawsonR.FernandesA. M.AlbuquerqueP. B.LaceyS. (2015). Remembering touch: Using interference tasks to study tactile and haptic memory. In JolicoeurP.LefebvreC.Martinez-TrujilloJ. (Eds.), Mechanisms of sensory working memory: Attention and performance XXV (pp. 239–259). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801371-7.00019-3
MarmorG. S.ZabackL. A. (1976). Mental rotation by the blind: Does mental rotation depend on visual imagery?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2(4), 515–521. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.2.4.515
36.
MazellaA.AlbaretJ. M.PicardD. (2014). Haptic tests for use with children and adults with visual impairments: A literature review. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 108(3), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x1410800306
37.
MazellaA.AlbaretJ. M.PicardD. (2016). Haptic-2D: A new haptic test battery assessing the tactual abilities of sighted and visually impaired children and adolescents with two-dimensional raised materials. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 48, 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.10.012
38.
MillerJ. C.SkillmanG. D. (2003). Assessors’ satisfaction with measures of cognitive ability applied to persons with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97(12), 769–774.
39.
MillerJ. C.SkillmanG. D.BenedettoJ. M.HoltzA. M.NassifC. L.WeberA. D. (2007). A three-dimensional haptic matrix test of nonverbal reasoning. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 101(9), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0710100905
40.
MinksA.WilliamsH.BasilleK. (2020). A critique of the use of psychometric assessments with visually impaired children and young people. Educational Psychology in Practice, 36(2), 170–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2020.1724894
41.
MorganC. J. (2017). Use of proper statistical techniques for research studies with small samples. American Journal of Physiology, Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, 313(5), L873–L877. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00238.2017
42.
NicholasJ. T.JohannessenA. M.van NunenT. (2019). Tactile Working Memory Scale. Nordic Welfare Centre.
43.
OberauerK.LewandowskyS.AwhE.BrownG. D. A.ConwayA. R. A.CowanN.DonkinC.FarrellS.HitchG. J.HurlstoneM. J.MaW. J.MoreyC. C.NeeD.SchweppeJ.VergauweE.WardG. (2018). Benchmarks for models of short term and working memory. Psychological Bulletin, 144(9), 885–958. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021468
44.
OccelliV.LaceyS.StephensC.MerabetL. B.SathianK. (2017). Enhanced verbal abilities in the congenitally blind. Experimental Brain Research, 235(6), 1709–1718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-4931-6
45.
OccelliV.LinJ. B.LaceyS.SathianK. (2014). Loss of form vision impairs spatial imagery. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 159. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00159
PicardD.LebazS.JouffraisC.MonnierC. (2010). Haptic recognition of two-dimensional raised-line patterns by early-blind, late-blind, and blindfolded sighted adults. Perception, 39(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1068/p6527
48.
PigeonC.Marin-LamelletC. (2015). Evaluation of the attentional capacities and working memory of early and late blind persons. Acta Psychologica, 155, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.11.010
49.
RączyK.KorczykM. (2018). Are IQ tests enough to measure intelligence in the blind? Brief review of available and potential methods to estimate intelligence in the blind. Rocznik Kognitywistyczny, 11, 17–34. https://doi.org/10.4467/20843895rk.18.002.9756
50.
RicciardiE.BoninoD.GentiliC.SaniL.PietriniP.VecchiT. (2006). Neural correlates of spatial working memory in humans: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study comparing visual and tactile processes. Neuroscience, 139(1), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.08.045
RuggieroG.IachiniT. (2010). The role of vision in the Corsi block-tapping task: Evidence from blind and sighted people. Neuropsychology, 24(5), 674–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019594
53.
SnyderH. R.MiyakeA.HankinB. L. (2015). Advancing understanding of executive function impairments and psychopathology: Bridging the gap between clinical and cognitive approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 328. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00328
54.
SommerfieldA. J.DearyI. J.McAulayV.FrierB. M. (2003). Moderate hypoglycemia impairs multiple memory functions in healthy adults. Neuropsychology, 17(1), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.17.1.125
55.
TaherdoostH. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(3), 28–36.
56.
TobinM. J.HillE. W. (2011). Issues in the educational, psychological assessment of visually impaired children: Test-retest reliability of the Williams Intelligence Test for children with defective vision. The British Journal of Visual Impairment, 29(3), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619611415333
57.
Van ErpJ. B.KyungK. U.KassnerS.CarterJ.BrewsterS.WeberG.AndrewI. (2010). Haptics: Generating and perceiving tangible sensations. In International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications (pp. 353–358). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14075-4
VecchiT. (2001). Visuo-spatial processing in congenitally blind people: Is there a gender-related preference?Personality and Individual Differences, 30(8), 1361–1370.
60.
VecchiT.MonticellaiM. L.CornoldiC. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory: Structures and variables affecting a capacity measure. Neuropsychologia, 33(11), 1549–1564. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(95)00080-M
61.
VecchiT.TintiC.CornoldiC. (2004). Spatial memory and integration processes in congenital blindness. NeuroReport, 15(18), 2787–2790.
62.
WakefieldC. E.HomewoodJ.TaylorA. J. (2006). Early blindness may be associated with changes in performance on verbal fluency tasks. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 100(5), 306–310.
WithagenA.KappersA. M. L.VervloedM. P. J.KnoorsH.VerhoevenL. (2013). Short term memory and working memory in blind versus sighted children. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(7), 2161–2172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.03.028
66.
ZarinoB.CrespiM.LauniM.CasarottiA. (2014). A new standardization of semantic verbal fluency test. Neurological Sciences, 35(9), 1405–1411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-014-1729-1
67.
ZhaoD.ZhouY.-D.BodnerM.KuY. (2018). The causal role of the prefrontal cortex and somatosensory cortex in tactile working memory. Cerebral Cortex, 28(10), 3468–3477. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx213
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
