Hemispheric asymmetry in processing visual stimuli was assessed in anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia and control subjects. Measurements of contrast sensitivity for low and high spatial frequencies were performed psychophysically and tested under functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) using a stimulus configuration that generates measurements for each temporal and nasal hemifield. The fMRI and the psychophysics results showed a marked hemispheric asymmetry in processing spatial frequencies for normal and anisometropic adults, in which low spatial frequencies were mainly processed in the left visual field – right hemisphere (LVF-RH: 0.3 cycles per degree [cpd]; F = 12.548; p = .002) and the high spatial frequencies were predominating processed in the right visual field – left hemisphere (RVF-LH: 2.0 cpd; F = 4.582; p = .021 and 8.3 cpd; F = 8.561; p = .001). No asymmetry was present in the amblyopic and the fellow eye of the strabismic amblyopia subjects. We conclude that the developmental organization of visual cortex in strabismic amblyopia is impaired differently from what happens in the anisometropic amblyopia and support the impairment of high-level visual-related functions observed in strabismic children.
Aaen-StockdaleC.HessR. F. (2008). The amblyopic deficit for global motion is spatial scale invariant. Vision Research, 48, 1965–1971.
2.
Aaen-StockdaleC.LedgewayT.HessR. F. (2007). Second-order optic flow deficits in amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 48, 5532–5538.
3.
AdamsD. L.EconomidesJ. R.HortonJ. C. (2015). Contrasting effects of strabismic amblyopia on metabolic activity in superficial and deep layers of striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 113, 3337–3344.
4.
AdamsD. L.HortonJ. C. (2009). Ocular dominance columns: Enigmas and challenges. Neuroscientist, 15, 62–77.
5.
AvrahamiJ.ArgamanT.Weiss-ChasumD. (2004). The mysteries of the diagonal: Gender-related perceptual asymmetries. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1405–1417.
6.
BarbanF.ZanninoG. D.SantangeloV.MacalusoE.SerraL.CaltagironeC.CarlesimoG. A. (2010). Amblyopic dyslexia: A little investigated reading disorder. Neurocase, 16, 397–407.
7.
CharrasP.LupianezJ. (2009). The relevance of symmetry in line length perception. Perception, 38, 1428–1438.
8.
CharrasP.LupianezJ. (2010). Length perception of horizontal and vertical bisected lines. Psychological Research, 74, 196–206.
9.
DingJ.KleinS. A.LeviD. M. (2013). Binocular combination in abnormal binocular vision. Journal of Vision, 13, 14.
10.
DingK.LiuY.YanX.LinX.JiangT. (2013). Altered functional connectivity of the primary visual cortex in subjects with amblyopia. Neural Plasticity, 2013, 612086.
11.
El-ShamaylehY.KiorpesL.KohnA.MovshonJ. A. (2010). Visual motion processing by neurons in area MT of macaque monkeys with experimental amblyopia. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 12198–12209.
12.
EvertD. L.KmenM. (2003). Hemispheric asymmetries for global and local processing as a function of stimulus exposure duration. Brain and Cognition, 51, 115–142.
13.
FarzinF.NorciaA. M. (2011). Impaired visual decision-making in individuals with amblyopia. Journal of Vision, 11, 6.
14.
GaoY.ReynaudA.TangY.FengL.ZhouY.HessR. F. (2014). The amblyopic deficit for 2nd order processing: Generality and laterality. Vision Research, 114, 111–121.
15.
HammL. M.BlackJ.DaiS.ThompsonB. (2014). Global processing in amblyopia: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 583.
16.
HessR. F.LiX.LuG.ThompsonB.HansenB. C. (2010). The contrast dependence of the cortical fMRI deficit in amblyopia: A selective loss at higher contrasts. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 1233–1248.
17.
HessR. F.LiX.MansouriB.ThompsonB.HansenB. C. (2009). Selectivity as well as sensitivity loss characterizes the cortical spatial frequency deficit in amblyopia. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 4054–4069.
18.
HessR. F.ThompsonB.GoleG. A.MullenK. T. (2010). The amblyopic deficit and its relationship to geniculo-cortical processing streams. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104, 475–483.
19.
HouC.PettetM. W.NorciaA. M. (2008). Abnormalities of coherent motion processing in strabismic amblyopia: Visual-evoked potential measurements. Journal of Vision, 8, 2–12.
20.
HubelD. H. (1979). Visual-cortex of normal and deprived monkeys. American Scientist, 67, 532–543.
21.
HubelD. H. (1982). Exploration of the primary visual-cortex, 1955-78. Nature, 299, 515–524.
22.
HubelD. H.WieselT. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in cats visual vortex. Journal of Physiology, 160, 106–154.
23.
HubelD. H.WieselT. N. (1963). Shape and arrangement of columns in cats striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 165, 559–568.
24.
HubelD. H.WieselT. N. (1964). Effects of monocular deprivation in kittens. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Archiv für Experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie, 248, 492–497.
25.
HubelD. H.WieselT. N. (1965). Binocular interaction in striate cortex of kittens reared with artificial squint. Journal of Neurophysiology, 28, 1041–1059.
26.
HubelD. H.WieselT. N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 195, 215–243.
27.
HubelD. H.WieselT. N. (1969). Anatomical demonstration of columns in monkey striate cortex. Nature, 221, 747–750.
28.
HubelD. H.WieselT. N. (1970). Cells sensitive to binocular depth in area-18 of macaque monkey cortex. Nature, 225, 41–42.
29.
HubelD. H.WieselT. N. (1973). Re-examination of stereoscopic mechanisms in area 17 of cat. Journal of Physiology, 232, 29–30.
30.
KanonidouE.ProudlockF. A.GottlobI. (2010). Reading strategies in mild to moderate strabismic amblyopia: An eye movement investigation. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 51, 3502–3508.
31.
LancasterJ. L.RaineyL. H.SummerlinJ. L.FreitasC. S.FoxP. T.EvansA. C.. . . MazziottaJ. C. (1997). Automated labeling of the human brain: A preliminary report on the development and evaluation of a forward-transform method. Human Brain Mapping, 5, 238–242.
32.
LancasterJ. L.WoldorffM. G.ParsonsL. M.LiottiM.FreitasC. S.RaineyL.. . . FoxP. T. (2000). Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Human Brain Mapping, 10, 120–131.
33.
NorciaA. M. (1996). Abnormal motion processing and binocularity: Infantile esotropia as a model system for effects of early interruptions of binocularity. Eye, 10(Pt. 2), 259–265.
34.
NorciaA. M.WesemannW.MannyR. E. (1999). Electrophysiological correlates of vernier and relative motion mechanisms in human visual cortex. Visual Neuroscience, 16, 1123–1131.
35.
ThompsonB.RichardA.ChuranJ.HessR. F.Aaen-StockdaleC.PackC. C. (2011). Impaired spatial and binocular summation for motion direction discrimination in strabismic amblyopia. Vision Research, 51, 577–584.
36.
ThompsonB.VilleneuveM. Y.CasanovaC.HessR. F. (2012). Abnormal cortical processing of pattern motion in amblyopia: Evidence from fMRI. NeuroImage, 60, 1307–1315.
37.
WeissmanD. H.WoldorffM. G. (2005). Hemispheric asymmetries for different components of global/local attention occur in distinct temporo-parietal loci. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 870–876.
