This study examined the effects of the first 2 years of the ongoing Project CHANGE, aimed at improving interaction and communication in adults with congenital deafblindness (CDB) and an intellectual disability (ID). Six adults with no history of deafblind education participated in this study. These first 2 years of CHANGE involved an improvement in living conditions, including a transition to a new group home and interactions with specialized caregivers. Video recordings and file information were used to measure interaction and communication during baseline (T0) and two subsequent periods (T1 and T2). The results show an improvement in interaction: attention by the caregiver, confirmation by the caregiver, and affective involvement all improved. An improvement was also shown in the participants’ level of expressive communication and in the variety of their communicative behaviors. The improvements over time emphasize the need for a specific approach for persons with CDB and an ID.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
2.
BjerkanB. (1996). When do congenital deafblinds communicate? On the distinction between communication and other types of social contact. In LaurentM. (Ed.), Communication and congenital deafblindness: The development of communication. What is new? (pp. 179–194). Suresnes, France: Centre national de Suresnes.
3.
Bloeming-WolbrinkK. A.Van den BovenkampL.JanssenM. J. (2010). Protocol for completion of the Communication Matrix in retrospect. Vries, The Netherlands: Royal Dutch Visio.
4.
BruceS. M. (2002). Impact of a communication intervention model on teachers’ practice with children who are congenitally deafblind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 154–168.
5.
BruceS. M. (2005). The impact of congenital deafblindness on the struggle to symbolism. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 52, 233–251.
6.
BruceS. M.GodboldE.Naponelli-GoldS. (2004). An analysis of communicative functions of teachers and their students who are congenitally deafblind. RE:view, 36, 81–90.
7.
DalbyD. M.HirdesJ. P.StoleeP.StrongJ.PossJ.TjamE. Y.AshworthM. (2009). Characteristics of individuals with congenital and acquired deaf-blindness. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103, 93–102.
8.
DamenS.JanssenM. J.HuismanM.RuijssenaarsW. A. J. J. M.SchuengelC. (2014). Stimulating intersubjective communication in an adult with deafblindness: A single-case experiment. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 19, 366–384. DOI:10.1093/deafed/enu006.
9.
DamenS.KefS.WormM.JanssenM. J.SchuengelC. (2011). Effects of video-feedback interaction training for professional caregivers of children and adults with visual and intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55, 581–595.
10.
DammeyerJ. (2010). Interaction of dual sensory loss, cognitive function, and communication in people who are congenitally deaf-blind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 104, 719–725.
11.
DiamondL. M.AspinwallL. G. (2003). Emotion regulation across the life span: An integrative perspective emphasizing self-regulation, positive affect, and dyadic processes. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 125–157.
12.
EvenhuisH. M.SjoukesL.KootH. M.KooijmanA. C. (2009). Does visual impairment lead to additional disability in adults with intellectual disabilities?Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53, 19–28.
13.
EvenhuisH. M.TheunissenM.DenkersI.VerschuureH.KemmeH. (2001). Prevalence of visual and hearing impairment in a Dutch institutionalized population with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 457–464.
14.
FellingerJ.HolzingerD.DirmhirnJ.GoldbergD. (2009). Failure to detect deafblindness in a population of people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53, 874–881.
15.
HartP. (2010). Moving beyond the common touchpoint: Discovering language with congenitally deafblind people (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Dundee, Scotland.
16.
JanssenM. J.Riksen-WalravenJ. M.Van DijkJ. P. M. (2003a). Contact: Effects of an intervention program to foster harmonious interactions between deafblind children and their educators. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 215–229.
17.
JanssenM. J.Riksen-WalravenJ. M.Van DijkJ. P. M. (2003b). Toward a diagnostic intervention model for fostering harmonious interactions between deafblind children and their educators. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 197–214.
MartensM. A. W.JanssenM. J.RuijssenaarsW. A. J. J. M.Riksen-WalravenJ. M. (2014). Introducing an intervention model for fostering affective involvement with persons who are congenitally deafblind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 108, 29–41.
20.
McInnesJ. M. (1999). Deafblindness: A unique disability. In McInnesJ. M. (Ed.), A guide to planning and support for individuals who are deafblind (pp. 3–33). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
21.
NarayanJ.BruceS. M. (2006). Perceptions of teachers and parents on the cognitive functioning of children with severe mental disability and children with congenital deafblindness. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 29, 9–16.
22.
PrainM. I.McVillyK. R.RamcharanP. (2012a). Being reliable: Issues in determining the reliability and making sense of observations of adults with congenital deafblindness?Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 632–641.
23.
PrainM. I.McVillyK. R.RamcharanP. (2012b). Interacting with adults with congenital deafblindness: The experience of disability support workers. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 37, 27–34.
24.
RowlandC. (2004). Communication Matrix: A communication skill assessment. Portland, OR: Oregon Institute on Disability & Development, Oregon Health & Science University.
25.
RowlandC. (Ed.). (2009). Assessing communication and learning in young children who are deafblind or who have multiple disabilities (Design to Learn Projects). Portland, OR: Oregon Health & Science University.
26.
RowlandC. (2011). Using the Communication Matrix to assess expressive skills in early communicators. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 32, 190–201.
27.
RowlandC.Fried-OkenM. (2010). Communication Matrix: A clinical and research assessment tool targeting children with severe communication disorders. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine: An Interdisciplinary Approach, 3, 319–329.
28.
RowlandC.SchweigertP. (2005). Learning to learn: A systematic child-centered model skill development in young children who are deafblind (Final report). Portland, OR: Oregon Institute on Disability & Development, Oregon Health: Science University.
29.
SroufeL. A. (1995). Emotional development: The organization of emotional life in the early years. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
TrevarthenC.AitkenK. (2001). Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory, and clinical applications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 3–48.
