The Unified English Braille (UEB) code has already been adopted by various countries. To inform the decision about UK adoption, a suite of research was carried out with UK braille readers and other stakeholders. Previous research indicates that readers of technical braille codes may be most affected by a move to UEB. In this study, six technical braille users were asked to read UEB samples of technical materials without training or reference to UEB symbols lists. While some errors and confusions occurred, participants felt that they were able to read and understand the coding, and believed they would improve with practice. Participants gave their views on the code and discussed potential implications of the transition to UEB. The majority of participants were in favour of adopting UEB in the United Kingdom.
BogartD. E.CranmerT. V.SullivanJ. (2000). Unifying the Braille codes. In DixonJ. (Ed.), Braille into the next millennium (pp. 160–181). Washington, DC: National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped, Library of Congress.
2.
BogartD.KoenigA. J. (2005). Selected findings from the first international evaluation of the proposed Unified English Braille Code. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 99, 233–238.
3.
CryerH.HomeS. (2008). Comparing Standard English Braille and Unified English Braille codes. Birmingham, UK: RNIB Centre for Accessible Information.
CryerH.HomeS.Morley WilkinsS. (2013). Unified English Braille (UEB) in the UK: Part 2 – Examination by literary Braille users, Braille teachers and transcribers. The British Journal of Visual Impairment, 31(3), 238–247.
EricssonK.SimonH. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd Edn). Boston: MIT Press.
8.
GerberE.SmithB. C. (2006). Literacy & controversy: Focus-group data from Canada on proposed changes to the Braille code. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 100, 459–470.
9.
HolbrookM. C.MacCuspieP. A. (2010). The Unified English Braille code: Examination by science, mathematics and computer science technical expert Braille readers. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 104, 533–541.
10.
KnowltonM.WetzelR. (2006). Analysis of the length of Braille texts in English Braille American Edition, the Nemeth code and Computer Braille Code versus the Unified English Braille code. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 100, 267–273.
11.
SteinmanB. A.KimbroughB. T.JohnsonF.LeJeuneB. J. (2004). Transferring Braille skills to the Unified English Braille code: A pilot study. Re:view, 36, 103–111.
WetzelW.KnowltonM. (2006a). Focus group research on the implications of adopting the Unified English Braille code. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 100, 203–211.
15.
WetzelW.KnowltonM. (2006b). Studies of Braille reading rates and implications for the Unified English Braille code. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 100, 275–284.
