Tactile maps and diagrams need to be carefully designed in order to be readable by the visually impaired user. In the Tactile Inkjet Mapping Project, we attempt to provide a new orientation for tactile map design through a rigorous programme of experimental research on design issues (cognitive tactualization approach). In this article we discuss three of our studies. The first study evaluates the use of different background materials for tactile graphics. The second study looks at the minimal perceptible distance between two lines. The third study investigates the optimal elevation (height off the paper) at which graphics are produced. We argue that experimental studies like these represent a necessary basis for the design of tactile maps.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amick, N. & Corcoran, J. (1997) Guidelines for the Design of Tactile Graphics. Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind .
2.
Bentzen, B.L. (1997) ‘Orientation aids’, in B.B. Blasch , W.R. Wiener and R.L. Welsh (eds) Foundations of Orientation and Mobility, 2nd edn, pp. 284–316. New York: American Foundation for the Blind .
3.
Bentzen, B.L. & Peck, A.F. (1979) ‘Factors affecting traceability of lines for tactile graphics’, Visual Impairment and Blindness, September, 264–269.
4.
Berla, E.P. (1982) ‘Haptic perception of tangible graphic displays’, in W. Schiff and E. Foulke (eds) Tactual Perception: A Sourcebook, pp. 364–386. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
5.
Berla, E.P. & Murr, J.M. (1975) ‘The effects of noise on the location of point symbols and tracking a line on a tactile pseudomap’ , Journal of Special Education, 9(2), 183–190 .
6.
Craig, J.C. (1999) ‘Grating orientation as a measure of tactile spatial acuity’ , Somatosensory and Motor Research, 16(3), 197–206 .
Edman, P.K. (1992) Tactile Graphics. New York: American Foundation for the Blind .
9.
Eriksson, Y. , Jansson, G. & Strucel, M. (2003) Tactile Maps: Guidelines for the Production of Maps for the Visually Impaired. Enskede, Sweden: The Swedish Braille Authority .
10.
Gardiner, A. & Perkins, C. (2003) Best practice guidelines for the design, production and presentation of vacuum formed tactile maps. [http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/geography/research/tactileguidelines/]
11.
Gill, J.M. & James, G.A. (1973) ‘A study on the discriminability of tactual point symbols’ , American Foundation for the Blind Research Bulletin, 26, 19–34 .
12.
Heath, W.R. (1958) ‘Maps and graphics for the blind: some aspects of the discriminability of textural surfaces for use in areal differentiation’, Geography. Washington, University of Washington .
13.
Hughes, B. & Jansson, G. (1994) ‘Texture perception via active touch’ , Human Movement Science, 13(3–4), 301–333 .
14.
James, G.A. & Gill, J.M. (1975) ‘A pilot study on the discriminability of tactile areal and line symbols for the blind’ , American Foundation for the Blind Research Bulletin, 29, 23–31 .
15.
Jansson, G. (1972) Projektet: PUSS VII: Symboler for Taktila Kartor. Rapport nr 30. Uppsala: Psikologiska Institutionen, Uppsala Universitet .
16.
Jansson, G. (1973) Projektet PUSS XVI: Linjeoch Ytsymboler for Taktila Kartor. Rapport nr 44. Uppsala: Psikologiska Institutionen, Uppsala Universitet .
17.
Jehoel, S. , Ungar, S. , McCallum, D. & Rowell, J. (2005a) ‘An evaluation of substrates for tactile maps and diagrams: scanning speed and users’ preferences’ , Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 99(2), 85–95 .
18.
Jehoel, S. , Ungar, S. & Rowell, J. (2005b) Developing a Set of Discriminable Tactile Symbols. Birmingham, UK: Tactile Graphics .
19.
Johansson, R.S. & LaMotte, R.H. (1983) ‘Tactile detection thresholds for a single asperity on an otherwise smooth surface’ , Somatosensory Research, 1(1), 21–31 .
20.
Johnson, K.O. & Phillips, J.R. (1981) ‘Tactile spatial resolution I: two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution and letter recognition’ , Journal of Neurophysiology, 46(6), 1177–1191 .
21.
Keates, J.S. (1982) Understanding Maps. New York: Halsted Press .
22.
Krueger, L.E. (1970) ‘David Katz's der Aufbau der Tastwelt (The world of touch): a synopsis’ , Perception and Psychophysics, 7(6), 337–341 .
23.
LaMotte, R.H. & Srinivasan, M.A. (1987) ‘Tactile discrimination of shape: responses of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents to a step stroked across the monkey fingerpad’ , Journal of Neuroscience, 7(6), 1655–1671 .
24.
Lederman, S.J. & Browse, R.A. (1988) ‘The physiology and psychophysics of touch’, in P. Dario (ed.) Sensors and Sensory Systems for Advanced Robots, pp. 71–91. Berlin: Springer Verlag .
MacEachren, A.M. (1995) How Maps Work: Representation, Visualisation and Design. New York: The Guilford Press .
27.
McCallum, D. & Ungar, S. (2003) ‘An introduction to the use of inkjet for tactile diagram production’ , British Journal of Visual Impairment, 21(2), 73–77 .
28.
McCallum, D. , Ahmed, K. , Jehoel, S. , Dinar, S. & Sheldon, D. (2005) ‘The design and manufacture of tactile maps using an inkjet process’ , Journal of engineering design, 16(6), 525–544 .
29.
Morley, J.W. , Goodwin, A.W. & Darian-Smith, I. (1983) ‘Tactile discrimination of gratings’ , Experimental Brain Research, 49(2), 291–299 .
30.
Morris, J.E. & Nolan, C.Y. (1961) ‘Discriminability of tactual patterns’, The Education of the Blind, December, 50–54.
31.
Nolan, C.Y. & Morris, J.E. (1971) Improvement of Tactual Symbols for Blind Children: Final Report. Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind .
32.
Phillips, J.R. & Johnson, K.O. (1981) ‘Tactile spatial resolution II: neural representation of bars, edges and gratings in monkey primary afferents’ , Journal of Neurophysiology, 46(6), 1192–1203 .
33.
Pike, E. , Blades, M. & Spencer, C. (1992) ‘A comparison of two types of tactile maps for blind children’ , Cartographica, 29(3&4), 83–88 .
34.
Rowell, J. & Ungar, S. (2003a) ‘The world of touch: an international survey of tactile maps. Part 1: production’ , British Journal of Visual Impairment, 21(3), 98–104 .
35.
Rowell, J. & Ungar, S. (2003b) ‘The world of touch: an international survey of tactile maps. Part 2: design’ , British Journal of Visual Impairment, 21(3), 105–110 .
36.
Srinivasan, M.A. & LaMotte, R.H. (1987) ‘Tactile discrimination of shape: responses of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents to a step indented into the monkey fingerpad’ , Journal of Neuroscience, 7(6), 1682–1697 .
37.
Stevens, J.C. , Foulke, E. & Patterson, M.Q. (1996) ‘Tactile acuity, aging and Braille reading in long-term blindness’ , Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2(2), 91–106 .
38.
Van Boven, R.W. & Johnson, K.O. (1994) ‘The limit of tactile spatial resolution in humans: grating orientation discrimination at the lip, tongue and finger’ , Neurology, 44(12), 2361–2366 .
39.
Vasconcellos, R. (1993) ‘Representing the geographical space for handicapped students: a case study on map use’ , paper presented at the International Cartographic Conference, Koln, International Cartographic Association.
