This literature review took place during 2004, and shows that the braille debate over Grade 1 and Grade 2 has been ongoing for more than 70 years. Given the span of time and a remit that covered the English-speaking world, a chronological approach was taken, focusing on the two main strands of policy and empirical research, from the early 20th century to the present day. Most of the material originates from the USA, Canada and the UK. Commissioned by the Royal National Institute of the Blind (RNIB), the review focuses on a single aspect of the code: the use of uncontracted braille, also referred to as Grade 1, and the use of contracted braille, which is commonly referred to as Grade 2. The review is concerned with English literary braille and does not address issues surrounding specialist mathematical, foreign language or scientific codes. In the papers reviewed, the important roles of specialist committees and international organizations are acknowledged, as well as the significant contributions made by individuals. The full report is lodged within the RNIB Research Library.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ashcroft, S.C. (1960) Errors in oral reading of Braille at elementary grade levels. Dissertation, University of Illinois . Summary reference on http://www.aph.org/edresearch/braillebib.html
2.
BANA (Braille Authority of North America) (2003) ‘US and Canada adopt new Braille terminology’, BANA Press Release Spring 2003http://www.tsbvi.edu/Outreach/seehear/spring03/braille.htm
3.
Biggs, I. (1950) ‘The introduction of Grade 2 in the primary grades’ , New Outlook for the Blind, 44, 103-105 . Summary on http://www.aph.org/edresearch/braillebib.html
4.
Birns, S. (1977) ‘Review of literature on Braille reading’ , New Beacon, 61 (718), 29-36 .
5.
Bogart, D.E. (1991) ‘Report on International Braille Conference’ , Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, May, 234-235 .
6.
Carey, K. (1996) Braille and the Information Technology Revolution. (Lecture) [http://www.ssc.mhie.ac.uk/Oxford/birmingham.html]
7.
Clunies-Ross, L. (2003) The Benefits of Braille as an Effective Communication and Self-help Tool: Braille, a Living Language. London: RNIB Reference Library .
8.
Clunies-Ross, L. , Franklin, A. & Keil, S. (1999) Blind and Partially Sighted Children in Britain: Their Incidence and Special Needs at a Time of Change. London: RNIB for the Nuffield Foundation .
9.
Davies, J.E. , Wisdom, S. & Creaser, C. (2001) Out of Sight but not Out of Mind. Loughborough Library and Information Statistics Unit, Occasional paper No. 29, Loughborough University .
10.
Douce, J. & Tobin, M.J. (1979) ‘The Braille code: extending the use of Braille and the improvement of reading skills’ , New Outlook for the Blind, 70(5), 215 .
11.
Durre, I. (1996) ‘How much space does Grade 2 Braille really save?’ , Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 90(3), 247-251 .
12.
Durre, K.P. , Tuttle, D.W. & Durre, I.K. (1991) A universal computer Braille code for literary and scientific texts. (IT Conference Paper) http://www.braille.org/papers/unive/unive.html
13.
Erin, J.N. & Sumranveth, P. (1995) ‘Teaching reading to students who are adventitiously blind’ , RE:view, 27(3), 103-111 .
14.
Franks, J. (1998) ‘To Braille or not to Braille? That is the question’ , The British Journal of Visual Impairment, 16(2), 57-60 .
15.
Gale, G. (2001) ‘In Australia: Braille literacy matters’ , The Educator, 13(1), 13-19 .
16.
Gardner, J. (2000) ‘Future Braille codes and fonts’. In Braille into the Next Millennium, pp. 514-531. Washington, DC: Library of Congress. National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped .
17.
Gill, J.M. & Clark, L.L. (1979) ‘Braille in the next decade’ , New Beacon, 63(746), 141-145 .
18.
Gray, P.G. & Todd, J.E. (1968) Mobility and Reading Habits of the Blind (Government Social Survey SS386). London: HMSO .
19.
Holbrook, M.C. & Koenig, A.J. (2001) ‘The challenge of providing appropriate literacy instruction for students with visual impairments’ , The Educator, 13(1).
20.
Hong, S. & Erin, J.N. (2004) ‘The impact of early exposure to uncontracted Braille reading on students with visual impairments’ , Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, June, 325-340 .
21.
International Council on English Braille (ICEB) (2004) Green light for Unified English Braille. [http://www.iceb.org/ganew04.html]
22.
Irwin, R. (1955) As I Saw It. New York: American Foundation for the Blind .
23.
Johnston, D. (2004) ‘I have mastered the Braille code but no one has taught me how to teach it’ , The British Journal of Visual Impairment, 22(1), 17-24 .
24.
Keil, S. (2004) ‘Teaching Braille to children’ , The British Journal of Visual Impairment, 22(1), 13-16 .
25.
Keil, S. & Clunies-Ross, L. (2002) Teaching Braille to Children (Research Report). London: RNIB .
26.
Lochhead, H.M. & Lorimer, J. (1954) Report of the Survey of the Frequency of All the Contractions of Standard English Braille, Grade 2. Edinburgh: Scottish Braille Press .
27.
Lorimer, J. (1990) ‘Improving Braille reading skills: the case for extending the teaching of Braille reading to upper primary and lower senior classes’ , The British Journal of Visual Impairment, 8(3), 87-89 .
28.
Lorimer, P. (1996) A critical evaluation of the historical development of the tactile modes of reading and an analysis and evaluation of researches carried out in endeavours to make the Braille code easier to read. Doctoral thesis, University of Birmingham.
29.
Mangold, S.S. (2000) ‘Trends in the use of Braille contractions in the United States: implications for UBC decisions’ , The Braille Monitor, 43(9), 813-819 .
30.
Miller, C. & Rash, A. (2001) Reading for everyone: expanding literacy options. [http://www.tsbvi.edu/Outreach/seehear/summer01/braille.htm]
31.
Nolan, C.Y. (1979) ‘Thoughts on the future of Braille’ , Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 73(8), 333-335 .
32.
Poole, B. (2000) ‘Braille: contracting out’ , New Beacon, 84(988), 4-7 .
33.
Poole, W.B.L. (1981) ‘Should Standard English Braille be reformed?’ , New Beacon, 65(770), 141-152 .
34.
Rex, E. (1989) ‘Issues related to literacy of legally blind learners’ , Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, June, 306-313 .
35.
Ryles, R. (2000) ‘Braille as a predictor of success’. In Braille into the Next Millennium, pp. 462-488. Washington, DC: Library of Congress. National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped .
36.
Spungin, S.J. & D’Andrea, F.M. (2000) ‘Braille literacy’. In Braille into the Next Millennium, pp. 434-461. Washington, DC: Library of Congress. National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped .
37.
Spragg, D. & Stone, J. (1986) ‘Proposed Braille codes: report of the AEWVH conference’ , The British Journal of Visual Impairment, 4(2): 73 .
Tobin, M.J. , Whittaker, J.R. , Greaney, J. & Hill, E.W. (1997) ‘The issue of Braille capitalisation in the UK: the BAUK Survey 1996’ , The British Journal of Visual Impairment, 15(1), 5-9 .
40.
Trent, S.D. & Truan, M.B. (1997) ‘Speed, accuracy and comprehension of adolescent Braille readers in a specialised school’ , Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 91(5), 494-500 [http://www.afb.org/jvib/main.asp]
41.
Troughton, M. (1992) One is fun: guidelines for better Braille literacy. Brantford, Ontario . [http://www.snow.utoronto.ca/best/special/OneisFun/cover_page.htm]
42.
Walhof, R. (2001) ‘Braille contractions: are they really so hard?’ , Braille Monitor, 44(4), 258-261 . [http://www.nfb.org/bm/bm01/BM0104/bm010405.htm]
43.
Wormsley, D.P. & D’Andrea, F.M. (2004) Braille Literacy: A Functional Approach. New York: AFB Press .
