Much of the local action to help people with impaired vision has been with us for well over a century. You would think, therefore, that its purpose - its essential credo - would now be well established and clear. Not so. In fact its place in the firmament of community endeavour has never been more muddied and muddled. it is under pressure, under attack and insecure. Why is this so? This paper explores how local voluntary action has lost focus; and what can be done to reassert the values and mores that should underpin it.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beveridge, William, Allen & Unwin (1978) Voluntary Action. The Future of Voluntary Organisations, the report of the Wolfenden Committee Croom Helm.
2.
Brown, Rt. Hon. Gordon MP (Mar 2000) Speech by the Chancellor of the Exchequer.
3.
Conservative Christian Fellowship (Jan 2000 ) Compassionate Communities. A Consultation Paper from the Conservative Christian Fellowship.
4.
Deakin, Prof. Nicholas (1998) Review of UK Charities. HMSO .
5.
Institute of Directors (June 1999) The End of Altruism. Knight, Barry (1993) Voluntary Action, The Home Office.
6.
Lomas, Graham M. & Vaughan, Hywel (1987) Working together - The Scope for Improving Working Links Between RNIB and Local Societies for the Blind, R N I B.
7.
National Association of Local Societies for Visually Impaired People (May 2000) Guidelines on Core Functions .
8.
Rnib (1987) Partnership in Fundraising. Report of a Working Party.
9.
Rnib (1998) Autonomy and Collaboration: Achieving Positive Relationships between RNIB and Local Societies. A Consultation Paper.
10.
The Smith and Williamson Group (May 1997) Review of RNIB's Relationship with Local Societies.
11.
Visual Handicap Group (1993) A New Deal for Blind and Partially Sighted People - Joint Action on Resource Centres to Develop Care in the Community, RNIB.
12.
Visual Handicap Group (1997) Closing the Gap- Linking Health and Social Care for Visually Impaired People , R N I B.