Risk assessment is becoming ever more central to the probation task, with front-line probation staff becoming increasingly aware of their accountability for mistakes in assessing and managing dangerous offenders. Hazel Kemshall, Lecturer in Probation Studies at the University of Birmingham, argues that the complex and indeterminate nature of risk assessment places an unfair pressure on practitioners who should expect a greater degree of managerial responsibility for front-line practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Jenkins, S. (1989) 'It's the Doers Wot Get the Blame'. The Sunday Times, 20th August, section B, p.1.
2.
Carson, D. (1996) Risking Legal Repercussions. In H. Kemshall and J. Pritchard (eds) Good Practice in Risk Assessment and Risk Management . London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers .
3.
Brearley, C.P. (1982) Risk and Social Work: Hazards and Helping. London: Routledge.
4.
Schon, D.A. (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco; London: Jossey-Bass . In the Jossey-Bass Higher Education Series.
5.
Jasanoff, S. (1993) 'Bridging the Two Cultures of Risk Analysis'. Risk Analysis, 13 (2) 123-129.
6.
Kemshall, H. , Parton, N., Walsh, M. and Waterson, J. (1997) 'Concepts of Risk in Relation to Organisational Structure and Functioning within the Personal Social Services and Probation'. Social Policy and Administration, 31 (3) 213-232.
7.
National Association of Probation Officers (1977) Risk. London: National Association of Probation Officers.
8.
Carson op cit. and Kemshall, H. (1996) Risk Assessment and Risk Management Workshops. Home Office Probation Training Section/Association of Chief Officers of Probation.
9.
Kemshall, H. (1996) Revewing Risk: A review of research on the assessment and management of risk and dangerousness: implications for policy and practice in the Probation Service. A report for the Home Office Research and Statistics Directorate. London: Home Office .
10.
Monahan, J. (1993) 'Limiting Therapist Exposure to Tarasoff Liability: Guidlines for Risk Containment'. American Psychologist, 48, March, 242-250.
11.
Tarasoff versus Regents of the University of California (1976 ), 131, Cal, Rptr. 14, 551 P2d 334.
12.
Weist, J. (1981) 'Treatment of Violent Offenders'. Clinical Social Work Journal, 9, 4, 271-281.
13.
Hood, C. and Jones, D.K.C. (1996) Accident and Design: Contemporary Debates in Risk Management. London: University CollegeLondon.
14.
Also: Reder, P., Duncan, S. and Gray, M. (1993) Beyond Blame: Child Abuse Tragedies Revisited. London: Routledge.
15.
Wynne, B. (1988) 'Unruly Technology'. Social Studies of Science, 18, 155.
16.
Grinyer, A. (1995): Risk, the Real World and Naive Sociology. In Gabe, J. (ed) Medicine, Health and Risk: Sociological Approaches. Oxford: Blackwell. Sociology of Health and Illness Monograph 1. pp 31-51.
17.
Dunsire, A. (1990) 'Holistic
18.
Governance'. Public Policy and Administration5 (1) 4-19.
19.
Sheen, Mr Justice. (1987) MV Herald of Free Enterprise. Report of Court No. 8076 Formal Investigation. London: Department of Transport.
20.
Horlick-Jones, T. (1996) 'The Problem of Blame'. In C. Hood andD. K. C. Jones (eds) Accident and Design: Contemporary Debates in Risk Management. London: University CollegeLondon. pp 61-71.
21.
Maupin, J. (1993) 'Risk Classification Systems and the Provision of Juvenile After-Care'. Crime and Delinquency, 39, 1, 90-105.
22.
Kemshall, H. (1998) Risk in Probation Practice. Ashgate.
23.
Hood and Jonesop cit.
24.
Freudenberg, W.R. (1988) 'Perceived Risk, Real Risk: Social Science and the Art of Probabilistic Risk Assessment'. Science, 242 (October), 44-49.
25.
Dunsire op cit, and Maynard-Moody , S., Musheno, M. and Palumbo, D. (1990) 'Street Wise Social Policy: Resolving the Dilemmas of Street-Level Influence and Successful Implementation'. Western Political Quarterly, 43, 831-848.
