If probation officers are to be involved in collecting data to compile prediction scores they must be aware of how the final data is to be used and interpreted. Tessa Webb, Probation Officer in Essex, argues that practitioners need to be able to place research findings in context and highlight their limitations, to ensure that their work is not evaluated and interpreted on narrow and unreliable grounds.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ward D.The Validity of the Reconviction Prediction Score, Home Office Research Study No 94, 1987.
2.
Humphrey C., Carter P. & Pease K. 'A Reconviction Predictor for Probationers', Br J Social Work22, pp 33-46, 1992.
3.
Wilkinson J. 'Using a Reconviction Predictor', Br J Social Work24, pp 461-475, 1994.
4.
Lloyd C., Mair G. & Hough M.Explaining Reconviction Rates: A Critical Analysis, Home Office Research Study No 136, 1994.