Anne Celnick, Research Officer for South Yorkshire Probation Service, and Bill McWilliams of the Cambridge Institute of Criminology tackle what constitutes legitimate 'help' in the supervision of offenders and try to disentangle this from other forms of intervention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Garland, D. 'Critical reflections on the Green Paper' in H Rees and E Hall Williams (eds) Punisbment, Custody and the Community Reflections and Comments on the Green Paper, London School of Economics, 1989
2.
Garland, D.Punishment and Modern Society, Oxford University Press , 1990.
3.
Eliot, T.S.The Hollow Men, V, 1925.
4.
Mauss, M.The Gift, Cohen and West, 1970
5.
Bottoms A.E. and McWilliams W. 'A non-treatment paradigm for probation practice ', British Journal of Social Work, 9, 159-202, 1979
6.
Celnick, M.A Social work help in probation practice. an exploration of some issues raised by the experience of a special probation project team. University of Sheffield, Unpublished Ph D thesis, 1989
7.
McIvor, G.Sanctions for Serious or Persistent Offenders: A Review of the Literature , University of Sttrling, 1990.
8.
Gendreau, P. and Ross, R.R. 'Success in corrections programs and principles', in R R Corrado, M LeBlanc and J Trepanier (eds) Current Issues in Juvenile Justice, Butterworth, 1983
