The role of the Senior has never been properly defined, but requires clearer definition and identity at a time of new demands and greater accountability. The author analyses the demanding and conflicting set of expectations facing supervisors if they are to offer a useful and coherent service to their teams.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
M. Vanstone & B. Seymour, 'Probation Service Objectives and the Neglected Ingredients', Probation Journal Vol 33 No 2, 1986 .
2.
Henry James, Prefaces, 1909.
3.
Mike Davies, 'Improving Staff Supervision', Probation Journal Vol 31 No 4, 1984 .
4.
K.W. Watson , 'Differential Supervision', Journal of Social Work, Nov. 1973.
5.
C. Payne & T. Scott, Developing Supervision of Teams an Field & Residential Social Work, NISW Paper No 12, 1982.
6.
R.W. Waters , Staff Supervision, Leicestershire Probation Service, Research & Information Document No 14, June 1985 .
7.
G.R. Boswell , Care, Control and Accountability in the Probation Service, Social Work Monograph 29, University of East Anglia , 1985.
8.
L. Blom-Cooper (Chair), A Child in TrustLondonBorough of Brent, 1985.
9.
R.J. Harris , 'A Changing Service: The Case for Separating Care and Control in Probation Practice; BJSW, Vol 10, No 2, 1980.
