The Home Office's attempt to state the role of the Service in the Criminal Justice System begs many questions about the directions for improvement of that system. The author suggests a rationale for Criminal Justice, and a consequent role for the Service which is relevant to community needs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Home Office Probation Service Division (1983 ) Probation Service in England and Wales Statement of National Purpose and Objectives (Draft)
2.
R Foren and R. Bailey( 1968) Authority in Social Casework, Pergamon Press
3.
A Bottoms and W. McWilliams (1979) A NonTreatment Paradigm tor Probation Practice BJSW vol 9 no 2
4.
L Radzinowicz( 1958) The Results of ProbationCambridgeDepartment of Criminal Science
5.
M.S. Folkard et al (1976) IMPACT Volume ll HMSO
6.
H Jones (1981), A Case for CorrectionBJSW vol 11 no 1
7.
R Harris( 1977) The Probation Officer as Social WorkerBJSW vol 7 no 4
8.
M. Bryant et al (1978) Sentenced to Social Work ProbationJournal vol 25 no 4
9.
For example M. Wright (1982) Making Good Burnett Books J Harding (1982) Victims and OffendersBedford Square Press
10.
See for instance N. Christie (1982) Limits to Pam Martin Robertson L Hulsman (1981 1982Penal Retorm in the Netherlands Howard Journal vol 20 no 3 and vol 2 1 no 1
11.
M Hough and P. Mayhew (1983) The British Crime Survey first reportHMSO
12.
P. Raynor (1980), Is there any sense in Social Inquiry Reports'Probation Journal vol 27 no 3
