An analysis of arguments for a more 'unambiguously controlling role' for Probation, and a re-assertion of traditional values of respect, concern and minimum interference with liberty.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
See, e.g., Burnham, D., 'The New Orthodoxy', Probation Journal, Vol 28, Nos 1and4, 1981.
2.
Drakeford, M., 'Probation: Custody in the Community?' Critical Social Policy, Vol 1, No 3, Spring 1982.
3.
The Widening Scope of the Probation and After-Care Service . Internal document of the Kent Probation and After-Care Service .
4.
Griffiths, W.A. , 'Supervision in the Community', JP, 21st August 1982.
5.
' A New Probation Service'Probation Journal, Vol 29 No 3, 1982 .
6.
Jordan, Bill , Automatic Poverty, p144, RKP, 1981.
7.
Jordan, Bill , Freedom and the Welfare State, p156, RKP, 1976.
8.
Smith, D., 'Individualisation and Justice', Probation Journal, Vol 27, No 4, 1980.
