Nuttall's Standard Dictionary. (1940 Edition.) Frederick Warne and Co. London.
2.
For a further discussion of this aspect see: H.A. Prins. "Some Thoughts on the Education of Professional Social Work Students." University of Leeds Review. Vol. XI. No. 1. p. 41.
3.
Report of the Committee on Local Authority and Allied Personal Social Services . (Seebohm Committee.) Cmnd. 3703. July 1968. H.M.S.O.
4.
Mary Hester . "Educational Process in Supervision". Social Casework, June 1951.
5.
L. Austin. "Basic Principles and Skills of Supervision in Social Work ." Social Casework. December 1952.
6.
R.W. Revans . "Morale and Effectiveness in Hospitals." New Society.3, 6-8, 1964. Quoted in B. Simon. "The Nature and Objectives of Professional Education." Assoc. of Soc. Wk. Teachers.1967. p. 19.
7.
Report of the Departmental Committee on the Probation Service. Cmnd. 1650. March 1962. (Morison Committee.) The Çommittee recommended that the duties of principal and senior probation officers need not any longer be prescribed by the Secretary of State. (para. 222.)
8.
Probation Papers. No. 4. "Seniority in the Probation Service." N.A.P.O. 1966. p. 5.
R.W. Speirs. "Casework Recording." Paper presented to a Conference of Principal Probation Officers and Probation Inspectors, High Leigh, Hoddesdon, 1959. (Unpublished.)
11.
See: Hester. Op. Cit. for a detailed discussion of this problem. There are few narrative accounts of the actual process of supervision but see M. Monger. "Casework in Probation." Butterworths. London. 1964. Part II.
12.
John Haines. "Evaluation as Part of Supervision". Case Conference. Vol. 13. No. 5. pp. 175-180.
13.
D.E.G. Plowman . "What are the Outcomes of Casework?" Social Work. Vol. 26. No. 1. January 1969.
14.
B.N. Rogers and J. Dixon.Portrait of Social Work. O.U.P. London, 1960.
