This article explores the integration and punishment experiences of Lithuanian emigrant offenders residing in England based on qualitative research data. The findings highlight a complex interplay of adverse childhood experiences, social isolation, substance dependencies and cultural differences, which shape their criminal behaviour and integration difficulties in the host society. Although England's criminal justice system adopts a more rehabilitation-oriented approach compared to Lithuania, participants frequently faced cultural and linguistic barriers, fostering a reliance on compatriot networks over local support systems. The primary drivers of behavioural change among participants were rooted not in institutional efforts within the English penal system but in personal crises, familial and community support, and religious faith. The study emphasises the importance of culturally tailored rehabilitation programmes, improved cultural awareness among correctional staff, and greater access to social integration resources to address the specific needs of immigrant offenders.
AebiMFHashimotoYZ (2022) SPACE II – 2022 – Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Persons under the Supervision of Probation Agencies. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
2.
AlivertiASeoigheR (2017) Lost in translation? Examining the role of court interpreters in cases involving foreign national defendants in England and Wales. New Criminal Law Review20(1): 130–156.
3.
ArmstrongGRosbrook-ThompsonJHobbsD (2020) Dislocation and criminality: the ‘Lithuanian problem’ in East London. In: PardoIPratoGBRosbrook-ThompsonJ (eds) Ethnographies of Urbanity in Flux: Theoretical Reflections, Vol. 10(3). London: Urbanities, pp. 51–69. February 2020.
4.
BhuiHS (2004) The resettlement needs of foreign national offenders. Criminal Justice Matters56(1): 36–44.
5.
Blachnicka-CiacekDBudginaite-MackineI (2022) The ambiguous lives of ‘the other whites’: class and racialisation of Eastern European migrants in the UK. The Sociological Review70(6): 1081–1099.
6.
BrosensDDe DonderLSmetcorenAS, et al. (2020) Exploring educational opportunities for foreign national prisoners in Europe. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research64(3): 389–407.
7.
BrouwerJ (2020) Bordered penality in the Netherlands: the experiences of foreign national prisoners and prison officers in a crimmigration prison. Punishment & Society22(5): 703–722.
8.
CantonRHammondN (2012) Foreigners to Justice? Irregular migrants and foreign national offenders in England and Wales. European Journal of Probation4(3): 4–20.
9.
ClowardRAOhlinLE (1960) Illegitimate means and delinquent subcultures. Social Deviance: Readings in Theory and Research5: 45–49.
10.
CohenA (1955) Delinquent Boys; The Culture of the Gang. Free Press.
FengQY (2011) Do socio-cultural issues matter? A qualitative psychological study of Chinese criminals in Aotearoa/New Zealand (Doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato).
13.
GalabuziGE (2009) Diversity on the mean streets of Toronto. Canada Watch: 38–40
KruttschnittCDirkzwagerAKennedyL (2013) Strangers in a strange land: coping with imprisonment as a racial or ethnic foreign national inmate. The British Journal of Sociology64(3): 478–500.
16.
Lithuanian Prison Service (2024) Report of the general unit of the Prison Department under the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania on the number, structure and change of prison population in 2022. Available at: https://kalejimai.lrv.lt/lt/administracine-informacija/ataskaitos/metu/ (accessed 30 April 2025).
17.
Lithuanian Probation Service (2024) Report on the number of persons under the supervision of the Lithuanian Probation Service. Available at: https://probacija.lrv.lt/public/canonical/1737355584/338/Darbo%20su%20asmenimis,%20esan%C4%8Diais%20LPT%20XXXXXXX%20prie%C5%BEi%C5%ABroje,%20statistin%C4%97%20ataskaita.pdf (accessed 30 April 2025).
18.
MertonRK (1938) Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review3(5): 672–682.
19.
MulgrewR (2018) The role of oversight in foreign-national only prisons: counteracting the disapplication of rehabilitation. Crime, Law and Social Change70(1): 77–92.
20.
NikartasSJarutienėL (2022) Individualising probation conditions in cases of domestic violence: the study of sentencing practice in Lithuania. European Journal of Probation14(2): 128–147.
21.
NikartasSPaliaukaJ (2024) ‘I would work with a client, but I have to fill out papers’: understanding professional roles and role conflicts experienced by Lithuanian probation officers. Probation Journal. Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1177/02645505241267120
22.
NikartasSTereškinasA (2022) Women’s pains of punishment: experiences of female offenders serving community sentences in Lithuania. Probation Journal69(1): 66–85.
23.
NikartasSVaičiūnienėRRinkevičiūtėG (2021) Probation officers’ discretionary decisions in responding to probation violations: the case of Lithuania. Probation Journal68(1): 28–46.
24.
OlszewskiSJ (2015) Inequities in social determinants of health factors and criminal behavior: a case study of immigrant ex-offenders. Northcentral University.
25.
OlszewskiSJForeCJ (2016) Inequities in social determinants of health factors and criminal behavior: A case study of immigrant ex-offenders. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory9(2): 1–19.
26.
RavagnaniLRomanoCA (2024) Foreigners in the probation system in Italy: substantial discrimination and challenges. European Journal of Probation16(1): 53–67.
27.
RobinsonG (2019) Delivering McJustice? The probation factory at the Magistrates’ court. Criminology & Criminal Justice19(5): 605–621.
28.
SakalauskasGJarutienėLKalpokasV, et al. (2020) Conditions of Imprisonment and Premises for Social Integration of Prisoners. Vilnius: Law Institute of Lithuania. Žara.
29.
Singh BhuiH (2007) Alien experience: foreign national prisoners after the deportation crisis. Probation Journal54(4): 368–382.
30.
SladeGVaičiūnienėR (2018) In comparative perspective: the effects of incarceration abroad on penal subjectivity among prisoners in Lithuania. European Journal of Criminology15(2): 217–234.
31.
TereškinasA (2010) Men and social suffering in contemporary Lithuania. Anthropology of East Europe Review28(1): 23–39.
32.
TereškinasA (2016) Family in the narratives of good life: performing masculinities in the Lithuanian correctional facilities. Journal of Comparative Family Studies47(1): 45–63.
33.
UgelvikTDamsaD (2018) The pains of crimmigration imprisonment: perspectives from a Norwegian all-foreign prison. The British Journal of Criminology58(5): 1025–1043.
34.
WarrJ (2016) The deprivation of certitude, legitimacy and hope: foreign national prisoners and the pains of imprisonment. Criminology & Criminal Justice16(3): 301–318.
WortleyS (2009) Introduction. The immigration-crime connection: competing theoretical perspectives. Journal of International Migration and Integration/Revue de l'integration et de la migration internationale10(4): 349–358.
