Since the publication of its strategy in 2012, the Offender Personality Disorder (OPD) Pathway continues to develop across the National Probation Service and prison estate. The relational crux of the Pathway exists between the probation officer and service user, with the former holding the lead professional role. This study aimed to develop an understanding of practitioners’ experience of inhabiting this role, in order that enhanced insight into the relationship at the centre of the Pathway could emerge. Discussion focuses on the implications of the findings for enabling relational security and psychologically informed practice in complex and risk averse systems.
AdsheadG (2012) Mirror mirror: Parallel processes in forensic institutions. In: AdlamJ. (ed.) The Therapeutic Milieu Under Fire. London: Jessica Kingsley.
2.
AiyegbusiAClarke-MooreJ (eds) (2009) Therapeutic Relationships with Offenders: An Introduction to the Psychodynamics of Forensic Mental Health Nursing. London: Jessica Kingsley.
3.
BarrettJ (2011) Sustainable organizations in health and social care: Developing a ‘team mind’. In: RubitelAReissD (eds) Containment in the Community: Act Supportive Frameworks for the Thinking about Antisocial Behaviour and Mental Health. London: Karnac Books.
4.
BarryM (2007) Listening and learning: The reciprocal relationship between worker and client. Probation Journal54(4): 407–422.
5.
BettlesSRichBBourneR (2016) Managing challenging residents: Putting the Knowledge and Understanding Framework (KUF) into practice in approved premises. Probation Journal63(4): 425–432.
6.
BoyleJKernohanWGRushT (2009) ‘When you are tired or terrified your voice slips back into its old first place’: The role of feelings in community mental health practice with forensic patients. Journal of Social Work Practice23(3): 291–313.
7.
BurnettRMcNeillF (2005) The place of the officer-offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime. Probation Journal52(3): 221–242.
CooperA (2009) Hearing the grass grow: Emotional and epistemological challenges of practice-near research. Journal of Social Work Practice23(4): 429–442.
10.
CooperALousadaJ (2005) Borderline Welfare: Feeling and Fear of Feeling in Modern Welfare. London: Karnac Books.
11.
FallonPBluglassREdwardsBDanielsG (1999) Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Personality Disorder Unit, Ashworth Special Hospital. London: HMSO.
12.
FarrallS (2004) Supervision, motivation and social context: What matters most when probationers desist? In: MairG (ed.) What Matters in Probation. Willan: Cullompton.
13.
GendersEPlayerE (2014) Rehabilitation, risk management and prisoners’ rights. Criminology and Criminal Justice14(14): 434–457.
14.
GillardSBorschmannRTurnerKGoodrich-PurnellNLovellKChambersM (2009) ‘What difference does it make?’ Finding evidence of the impact of mental health service user researchers on research into the experiences of psychiatric patients. Health Expectations13: 185–194.
15.
GordonN (2011) Qualitative research with staff in forensic settings: A grounded theory example. In: SheldonKDaviesJHowellsK (eds) Research in Practice for Forensic Professionals. London: Routledge.
16.
JosephNBenefieldN (2012) A joint Offender Personality Disorder Pathway strategy: An outline summary. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health22: 210–217.
17.
KurtzA (2005) The needs of staff who care for people with a diagnosis of personality disorder who are considered a risk to others. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology16(2): 399–422.
18.
KurtzATurnerK (2007) An exploratory study of the needs of staff who care for offenders with a diagnosis of personality disorder. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice80: 421–435.
19.
LowdellAAdsheadG (2009) The best defence: Institutional defences against anxiety in forensic services. In: AiyegbusiAClarke-MooreJ (eds) Therapeutic Relationships with Offenders: An Introduction to the Psychodynamics of Forensic Mental Health Nursing. London: Jessica Kingsley.
20.
McNeillF (2012) Counterblast: A Copernican correction for community sentences?The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice51(1): 94–99.
Menzies-LythI (1988 [1959]) The functioning of social systems as a defence against anxiety: A report on a study of the nursing service of a general hospital. In: Menzies-Lyth I, Containing Anxiety in Institutions, Selected Essays: Volume 1. London: Free Association Books.
23.
MillonT. (2004) Personality Disorders in Modern Life, 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
24.
MorganDRuszczynskiS (eds) (2007) Lectures on Violence, Perversion and Delinquency. London: Karnac Books.
25.
NOMS (2011) The Offender Engagement Programme: An Overview from Programme Director, Martin Copsey. London: Ministry of Justice.
PhillipsJWestabyCFowlerA (2016) The impact of working primarily with high-risk offenders. Probation Journal63(2): 182–192.
28.
RamsdenJJoyesEGordonN (2016) How working with psychologists has influenced probation practice. Probation Journal63(1): 54–71.
29.
ReissDKirtchukG (2009) Interpersonal dynamics and multidisciplinary teamwork. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment15: 462–469.
30.
SmithKBileyF (1997) Understanding grounded theory principles and evaluation. Nurse Researcher4(3): 17–30.
31.
StokoeP (2011) The healthy and the unhealthy organization: How can we help teams to remain effective? In: RubitelAReissD (eds) Containment in the Community: Supportive Frameworks for the Thinking About Antisocial Behaviour and Mental Health. London: Karnac Books.
32.
SuddabyR (2006) From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal49(4): 633–642.
33.
WeaverB (2012) The relational context of desistance: Some implications and opportunities for social policy. Social Policy & Administration46(4): 395–412.
34.
WeaverB (2014) Change or control? Developing dialogues between desistance research and public protection practice. Probation Journal61(1): 8–26.
35.
WeaverBBarryM (2014) Managing high risk offenders in the community: Compliance, cooperation and consent in a climate of concern. European Journal of Probation6(3): 278–295.
36.
WoodHBrownG (2014) Psychoanalytically-informed clinical supervision of staff in probation services. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy28(3): 330–344.
37.
YakeleyJ (2010) Violence: Psychoanalytic perspectives. In: YakeleyJ, Working with Violence A Contemporary Psychoanalytic Approach. London: Palgrave.
