An analysis is presented of how prisoners’ relatives experience and attribute meanings to the imprisonment of one or more family members. Drawing on 30 interviews conducted in Portugal with men and women taking an active role in supporting prisoners, the article explores the collateral consequences associated with both male and female imprisonment. Empirical findings point to the heterogeneous, ambivalent, complex and dynamic character of prisoners’ relatives experiences and meanings. In addition, the results also highlight the significant impact of gender relations and access to social and economic resources on the social implications associated with imprisonment.
AunglesA (1994) The Prison and the Home: A Study of the Relationship Between Domesticity and Penality. Sydney: The Institute of Criminology Monograph Series.
2.
BoswellGWedgeP (2002) Imprisoned Fathers and their Children. London and New York: Jessica Kingsley.
3.
BramanD (2004) Doing Time on the Outside: Incarceration and Family Life in Urban America. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
4.
CarlenPTombsJ (2006) Reconfigurations of penality: the ongoing case of the women’s imprisonment and reintegration industries. Theoretical Criminology10(3): 337–360.
ChristianJ (2005) Riding the bus: barriers to prison visitation and family management strategies. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice21(1): 31–48.
7.
ChristianJKennedyLW (2011) Secondary narratives in the aftermath of crime: defining family members’ relationships with prisoners. Punishment & Society13(4): 379–402.
8.
ClearTR (2007) Imprisoning Communities: How Mass Incarceration Makes Disadvantaged Neighborhoods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
ClemmerD (1958) The Prison Community. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
10.
CoddH (2000) Age, role changes and gender power in family relationships: the experiences of older female partners of male prisoners. Women & Criminal Justice12(2/3): 63–93.
11.
CoddH (2008) In the Shadow of Prison: Families, Imprisonment and Criminal Justice. London and New York: Routledge.
12.
ComfortM (2003) In the tube at san quentin: the “secondary prisonization” of women visiting inmates. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography32(1): 77–107.
13.
ComfortM (2007) Punishment beyond the legal offender. Annual Review of Law and Social Science3(1): 12.1–12.26.
14.
ComfortM (2008) Doing Time Together: Love and Family in the Shadow of the Prison. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
15.
CondryR (2007) Families Shamed: The Consequences of Crime for Relatives of Serious Offenders. Oxford: Willan Publishing.
16.
CunhaMI (2008) Closed circuits: kinship, neighborhood and incarceration in urban Portugal. Ethnography9(3): 325–350.
17.
CunhaMI (2014) The ethnography of prisons and penal confinement. Annual Review of Anthropology43: 217–233.
18.
DuweGClarkV (2011) Blessed be the social tie that binds: the effects of prison visitation on offender recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review24(3): 271–296.
19.
FishmanL (1990) Women at the Wall: A Study of Prisoners’ Wives Doing Time on the Outside. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
20.
General Directorate of Reintegration and Prisons (Direção-Geral de Reinserção e Serviços Prisionais - DGRSP) (2016) Available at: http://www.dgsp.mj.pt(accessed 16 May 2016).
GoffmanE (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon and Schuster.
23.
GranjaRCunhaMIMachadoH (2014) The social and economic costs of female imprisonment: the prisoners’ point of view. In: CarrollEWarnerK (eds) Re-Imagining Imprisonment in Europe: Effects, Failures and the Future. Dublin: The Liffey Press, pp. 123–143.
24.
GranjaRCunhaMIMachadoH (2015) Mothering from prison and ideologies of intensive parenting: enacting vulnerable resistance. Journal of Family Issues36(9): 1212–1232.
25.
GuestGBunceAJohnsonL (2006) How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods18(1): 59–82.
HairstonCF (2009) Kinship Care When Parents Are Incarcerated: What We Know, What We Can Do. Baltimore, MD: Annie E Casey Foundation.
28.
HolzerHJRaphaelSStollMA (2004) Will employers hire former offenders? Employer preferences, background checks, and their determinants. In: PattilloMWesternBWeimanD (eds) Imprisoning America: The Social Effects of Mass Incarceration. New York: Russel Sage Foundation, pp. 205–246.
29.
LeverentzA (2006) The love of a good man? Romantic relationships as a source of support or hindrance for female ex-offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency43(4): 459–488.
30.
LeverentzA (2011) Being a good daughter and sister: families of origin in the re-entry of African-American female ex-prisoners. Feminist Criminology6(4): 239–267.
31.
MarchettiA-M (2002) Carceral impoverishment: class inequality in the french penitentiary. Ethnography3(4): 416–434. Available at:http://doi.org/10.1177/1466138102003004014
32.
MauerMChesney-LindM (2002) Invisible Punishment: The Collateral Consequences of Mass Imprisonment, New York: New Press.
33.
MillsACoddH (2008) Prisoners’ families and offender management: mobilizing social capital. Probation Journal55(1): 9–24.
34.
MorrisP (1965) Prisoners and Their Families, London: George Allen and Unwin.
35.
PattilloMWeimanDWesternB (2004) Imprisoning America: The Social Effects of Mass Incarceration. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
36.
PortugalS (1999) Family and social policy in Portugal. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family13: 235–246.
37.
RichieB E (2002) The social impact of mass incarceration on women. In: MauerMChesney-LindM (eds) Invisible Punishment: The Collateral Consequences of Mass Imprisonment. New York: New Press, pp. 136–149.
38.
RicordeauG (2007) Les relations familiales a l’épreuve de l’incarceration : solidarités et sentiments à l’ombre des murs. PhD Thesis, Université Paris IV, Sorbonne, France.
39.
SampsonRJ (2011) The incarceration ledger: toward a new era in assessing societal consequences. Criminology & Public Policy10(3): 819–828.
40.
SantosBGomesCAlmeidaJDuarteMFernandoPSousaFAbreuP (2003) A Reinserção Social dos Reclusos. Um Contributo para o Debate sobre a Reforma do Sistema Prisional. Coimbra: Observatório Permanente da Justiça Portuguesa.
41.
SharpSMarcus-MendozaS (2001) It’s a family affair: incarcerated women and their families. Women & Criminal Justice12(4): 21–49.
42.
SilvaEBSmartC (1999) The New Family?London: Sage Publications.
43.
SmithRGrimshawRRomeoRKnappM (2007) Poverty and Disadvantage Among Prisoners’ Families. London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
44.
SturgesJEHanrahanKJ (2011) The effects of children’s criminality on mothers of offenders. Journal of Family Issues32(8): 985–1006.
45.
TourautC (2012) La Famille à l’ Épreuve de la Prison. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
46.
TuranovicJJRodriguezNPrattTC (2012) The collateral consequences of incarceration revisited: a qualitative analysis of the effects on caregivers of children of incarcerated parents. Criminology50(4): 913–959.
47.
WacquantL (2000) The new ‘peculiar institution’: on the prison as surrogate ghetto. Theoretical Criminology4(3): 377–389.
48.
WacquantL (2002) The curious eclipse of prison ethnography in the age of mass incarceration. Ethnography3(4): 371–397.
