This article draws on doctoral research undertaken in 2013 to consider the likely impact of the Transforming Rehabilitation changes upon relationships between offenders and probation staff, in the specific context of Integrated Offender Management. Conducted during the initial stages of consultation and roll-out, the research gathered speculative but informed predictions of the impact of Transforming Rehabilitation.
AnnisonJ (2013) Innovation in probation practice: Past, present and future. Probation Journal60(3): 227–241.
2.
AnnisonJHockingA (2012) The Quest for Success: Evaluation of an Integrated Offender Management Scheme. Presentation to the British Society of Criminology Conference, University of Portsmouth, July 2012.
3.
AnnisonJBurkeLSeniorP (2014). Transforming Rehabilitation: Another example of English ‘exceptionalism’ or a blueprint for the rest of Europe?European Journal of Probation6(1): 6–23.
4.
BurkeL (2013) The 2013 Offender Rehabilitation Bill: ‘A curious mix?’British Society of Criminology Newsletter72: 20–24.
5.
CantonR (2013) The point of probation: On effectiveness, human rights and the virtues of obliquity. Criminology and Criminal Justice13(5): 577–593.
6.
CarterP (2003) Managing Offender, Reducing Crime: A New Approach. London: Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit.
7.
Clinks (2014) Clinks Briefing on the Invitation to Negotiate stage of the Transforming Rehabilitation Reforms. London: Clinks.
8.
Criminal Justice Joint Inspection (2014) A Joint Inspection of the Integrated Offender Management Approach. London: Criminal Justice Joint Inspection.
9.
DawsonPCuppleditchL (2007) An Impact Assessment of the Prolific and Other Priority Offender Programme. Home Office Online Report 08/07. London: Home Office.
10.
DawsonPMeadG (2005) Early Findings from the Prolific and Other Priority Offenders Evaluation. Home Office Development and Practice Report 46. London: Home Office.
11.
Hallam Centre for Community Justice (2013) Evaluation of Integrated Offender Management in Sussex. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University.
12.
HeddermanC (2013) Payment by results: Hopes, fears and evidenceBritish Journal of Community Justice11(2−3): 43–58.
13.
HM Inspectorate of Probation (2015a) Transforming Rehabilitation Early Implementation 3: An Independent Inspection of the Arrangements for Offender Supervision. Manchester: HM Inspectorate of Probation.
14.
HM Inspectorate of Probation (2015b) Transforming Rehabilitation Early Implementation 2: An Independent Inspection of the Arrangements for Offender Supervision. Manchester: HM Inspectorate of Probation.
15.
Home Office and Ministry of Justice (2009) Integrated Offender Management: Government Policy Statement. London: Home Office and Ministry of Justice.
16.
Home Office and Ministry of Justice (2015) Integrated Offender Management Key Principles [Refreshed]. London: Home Office.
17.
Integrated Offender Management (2013) Local Manual. [Authors, place of publication and publisher anonymized.]
18.
Justice Committee (2014) Crime Reduction Policies: A Co-ordinated Approach?Interim report on the Government’s Transforming Rehabilitation programme HC 1004 2013−14. London: The Stationery Office.
19.
LieblingA (2006) Lessons from prison privatisation for probation. In: HoughMAllenRPadelU (eds) Reshaping Probation and Prisons: The New Offender Management Framework. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 69–77.
20.
McGuireJ (ed.) (2002) What Works: Reducing Reoffending. Guidelines from Research and Practice. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
21.
McNeillFWeaverB (2010) Changing Lives? Desistance Research and Offender Management. Report 03/2010. Edinburgh: Scottish Centre for Crime and Criminal Justice.
22.
McNeillF (2013) Transforming Rehabilitation: Evidence, values and ideology. British Journal of Community Justice11(2−3): 83–85.
23.
MaguireMRaynorPVanstoneMKynchJ (2000) Voluntary after-care and the probation service: A case of diminishing responsibility. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice39(3): 234–248.
24.
Ministry of Justice (2013a) Transforming Rehabilitation: A Revolution in the Way We Manage Offenders. Consultation Paper CP1/2013. London: Ministry of Justice.
25.
Ministry of Justice (2013b) Transforming Rehabilitation: A Strategy for Reform. Response to Consultation CP(R)16/2013. London: Ministry of Justice.
26.
Ministry of Justice (2013c) Target Operating Model: Rehabilitation Programme. London: Ministry of Justice.
27.
Ministry of Justice (2014) Transforming Rehabilitation Programme – Payment Mechanism Design Overview. London: Ministry of Justice.
28.
Ministry of Justice (2015) Proven Re-offending Statistics Quarterly Bulletin, July 2012 to June 2013, England and Wales. London: Ministry of Justice.
29.
National Audit Office (2014a) Probation: Landscape Review. London: National Audit Office.
30.
National Audit Office (2014b) The Work Programme. London: National Audit Office.
31.
NewburnT (2013) This is not quite the death knell of the probation service but it is certainly the most radical change it has ever seen. LSE Blogs, 10 January. Available athttp://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/ (accessed 1 July 2013).
Public Accounts Committee (2014) Probation: Landscape Review. HC1114 2013-14. London: The Stationery Office.
35.
RobinsonGBurkeLMillingsM (2015) Criminal justice identities in transition: The case of devolved probation services in England and Wales. British Journal of Criminology56(1): 161–178.
36.
RobinsonGPriedeCFarrallSShaplandJ (2014) Understanding ‘quality’ in probation practice: Frontline Perspectives in England and Wales. Criminology & Criminal Justice14(2): 123–142.
37.
SeniorP (ed.) (2013) Special Issue: Transforming Rehabilitation − Under the Microscope. British Journal of Community Justice11(2−3): 1–229.
38.
SeniorPWongKCulshawAEllingworthDO’KeeffeCMeadowsL, Ecotec Research & Consultancy and ZCK Consultancy (2011) Process Evaluation of Five Integrated Offender Management Pioneer Areas. Ministry of Justice Research Series 4/11. London: Ministry of Justice.
39.
WardTBrownM (2004) The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime and Law10(3): 243–257.
40.
WilliamsAEArielB (2013) The Bristol Integrated Offender Management Scheme: A pseudo-experimental test of Desistance Theory. Policing7(2): 121–132.
41.
WilliamsB (1992) Caring professionals or street-level bureaucrats? The case of probation officers. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice31(4): 263–274.
42.
WorrallAMawbyRC (2004) Intensive projects for prolific/persistent offenders. In: BottomsARexSRobinsonG (eds) Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, pp. 268–289.
