Motivation and engagement in desistance programmes are examined in an article that analyses two projects that aimed to ‘normalize lifestyles’ of chaotic offenders. In one of the projects, participants claimed that their engagement was related to the charitable sector of the provider, which meant that staff were outside of the parameters of offender management regimes. However, similar claims were made by participants in the other programme − which was delivered by statutory public sector agencies but by staff operating in different roles to the usual probation service framework. On this basis it is argued that the character, culture and ethos of programmes is of greater significance than their status in terms of third, public or private sectors.
BottomsA (2001) Compliance and community penalties. In: BottomsAGelsthorpeLRexS (eds) Community Penalties: Changes and Challenges. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, pp. 87–116.
2.
BurnettR (1992) The Dynamics of Recidivism: Summary Report. Oxford: Centre for Criminological Research.
3.
DayABryanJDaveyLCaseyS (2006) The process of change in offender rehabilitation programmes. Psychology, Crime & Law12: 473−487.
4.
ElderGH (1985) Preface. In: ElderGH (ed.) Life-Course Dynamics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 15–20.
5.
ElffersH (2010) Misinformation, misunderstanding and misleading as validity threats to offenders’ accounts of offending. In: BernascoW (ed.) Offenders on Offending: Learning about Crime from Criminals. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, pp. 13−22.
6.
FarrallS (2002) Rethinking What Works with Offenders: Probation, Social Context and Desistance from Crime. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
7.
GarsideR (2004) Crime, Persistent Offenders and the Justice Gap. London: Crime and Society Foundation.
8.
HealyD (2010) The Dynamics of Desistance – Charting Pathways Through Change. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
9.
HeddermanCGunbyCSheltonN (2011) What women want: The importance of qualitative approaches in evaluating work with women offenders. Criminology and Criminal Justice11(1): 3−19.
10.
Home Office (2004) The Reducing Re-offending National Action Plan. London: Home Office.
11.
Home Office/Ministry of Justice (2010) Integrated Offender Management: Key Principles. London: Home Office/Ministry of Justice.
12.
JacquesSWrightR (2010) Apprehending criminals: The impact of law on offender-based research. In: BernascoW (ed.) Offenders on Offending: Learning About Crime from Criminals. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, pp. 23−45.
13.
LeBelTPBurnettRMarunaSBushwayS (2008) The ‘chicken and egg’ of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology5: 131–159.
14.
McMurranM (2009) Motivational interviewing with offenders: A systematic review. Legal and Criminological Psychology14: 83–100.
15.
McSweeneyTStevensAHuntNTurnbullPJ (2007) Twisting arms or a helping hand? Assessing the impact of ‘coerced’ and comparable ‘voluntary’ drug treatment options. British Journal of Criminology, 47: 470−490.
16.
MarunaS (2001) Making Good: How Ex-convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
17.
MarunaSLebelTPMitchellNNaplesM (2004) Pygmalion in the reintegration process: Desistance from crime through the looking glass. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10: 271–281.
18.
MawbyRWorrallA (2011) ’They were very threatening about do-gooding bastards’: Probation’s changing relationships with the police and prison services in England and Wales. European Journal of Probation, 3: 78–94.
19.
MillerWRRollnickS (2002) Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change (2nd edn.). New York: Guilford.
20.
Ministry of Justice (2010) Breaking the Cycle: Effective Punishment, Rehabilitation and Sentencing of Offenders, London: Ministry of Justice.
VaughanB (2007) The internal narrative of desistance. British Journal of Criminology, 47: 390−404.
29.
VennardJHeddermanC (2009) Helping offenders into employment: How far is voluntary sector expertise valued in a contracting-out environment?Criminology and Criminal Justice9: 225–245.
