This article begins to consider the factors that promote the formation of a positive working relationship (PWR) between practitioner and probationer. The results from a pilot study are used to review the importance of ‘assist, advice and befriend’ and ‘confront, challenge and change’ within current practitioner−offender relationships. Through collaborative design, five probationers completed visual narratives to explore significant PWRs with criminal justice professionals and 36 probation staff completed a questionnaire to examine their beliefs around PWRs with probationers. The results highlight the benefit of demonstrating a genuine belief in probationers’ capacity to change and are discussed in light of the literature.
AnsbroM (2008) Using attachment theory with offenders. Probation Journal55(3): 231−244.
2.
AtkinsonR (1998) The Life Story Interview. London: Sage Publications.
3.
BarryM (2000) The mentor/monitor debate in criminal justice: ‘What works’ for offenders. British Journal of Social Work30: 575−595.
4.
BarryM (2007) Listening and learning: The reciprocal relationship between worker and client. Probation Journal54(4): 407−422.
5.
BontaJAndrewsDA (2007) Risk-Need-Responsivity Model for Offender Assessment and Rehabilitation, Corrections Research User Report No. 2007-06. Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada.
6.
BordinES (1979) The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice16(3): 252−260.
7.
BourgonGGutierrezLAshtonJ (2011). The evolution of community supervision practice: The transformation from case manager to change agent. Irish Probation Journal8: 28−48.
8.
ChuiWH (2003) Experiences of probation supervision in Hong Kong: Listening to the young adult offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice: An International Journal31(6): 567−577.
9.
ClarkMD (2005) Motivational interviewing for probation staff: Increasing the readiness to change. Federal Probation69(2): 22−28.
DowdenCAndrewsD (2004) The importance of staff practice in delivering effective correctional treatment: A meta-analytic review of core correctional practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology48(2): 203−214.
12.
ElvinsRGreenaJ (2008) The conceptualization and measurement of therapeutic alliance: An empirical review. Clinical Psychology Review28(7): 1167−1187.
13.
GregoryMJ (2010) Reflection and resistance: Probation practice and the ethic of care. British Journal of Social Work40(7): 2274−2290.
14.
IlgenMAMcKellarJMoosRFinneyJW (2006) Therapeutic alliance and the relationship between motivation and treatment outcomes in patients with alcohol use disorder. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment31(2): 157−162.
15.
LabovWWaletzkyJ (1967) Narrative analysis; oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History7(1−4): 3−38.
16.
LambertMJBarleyDE (2001) Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training38(4): 357−361.
17.
MartinDJGarskeDavisMK (2000) Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology68: 438–450.
18.
MarunaS (2000) Making Good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19.
MillerWRRollnickS (2002) Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change, 2nd Edition. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
20.
NewmanJNutleyS (2003) Transforming the probation service: ‘What works’, organisational change and professional identity. Policy and Politics31(4): 547−563.
PartridgeS (2004) Examining Case Management Models for Community Sentences, Online Report 17/04. London: Home Office.
24.
ReasonM (2010) Mind Maps, Presentational Knowledge and Dissemination of Qualitative Research, Realities Working Paper. Manchester: Realities.
25.
RexS (1999) Desistance from offending: Experiences of probation. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice38(4): 366−383.
26.
RobsonC (2002) Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Resources. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
27.
RossaECPolaschekaDLLWardT (2008) The therapeutic alliance: A theoretical revision for offender rehabilitation. Aggression and Violent Behavior13(6): 462−480.
28.
StewartLPichecaJC (2001) Improving offender motivation for programming: Living skills and family violence prevention programs. Forum of Corrections Research13: 18–20.
29.
TaggSK (1985) Life story interviews and their interpretation. In: BrennerMBrownJCanterD (eds) The Research Interview: Uses and Approaches. London: Academic Press.
30.
WardT (2002) The management of risk and the design of good lives. Australian Psychology37(3): 172−179.
31.
YoungBTardifC (1992) Interviewing: Two sides of the story. Paper presented at theInternational Journal of Qualitative Research5: 135−145.
