The aim of this literature review is to examine the potential impact of the introduction of the Drug Rehabilitation Requirement (DRR) on homeless drug-using offenders. There is however, little research into either the recently introduced DRR, or court-ordered treatment imposed upon people who are homeless. The article is, therefore, confined to reviewing research and literature into the predecessor of the DRR — the Drug Treatment and Testing Order (DTTO). The article will then explore how DRRs may perform similarly or differently to DTTOs and what issues emerge for people who are homeless.
Barker, V., C. Horrocks, N. Kelly and D. Robinson (2002) Experiencing Drug Treatment and Testing Orders in Wakefield: Taking a Narrative Approach. Wakefield: Easton Wakefield Primary Care Trust.
2.
Bourn, J. (2004) The Drug Treatment and Testing Order: Early Lessons . London: The Stationery Office .
3.
Briggs, S. and R. Turner (2005) Engagement, Motivation and Effectiveness with Substance-Misusing Offenders: Offenders and Staff Talk about the Drug Treatment and Testing Order (DTTO). West Yorkshire: National Probation Service. URL (accessed May 2006): http://www.westyorksprobation.org.uk/pages/research.php?subject=DRUGS
4.
Buchanan, J. (2004) `Missing Links? Problem Drug Use and Social Exclusion' , Probation Journal51(4): 387-97.
5.
Burnett, R. and F. McNeill (2005) `The Place of the Officer-Offender Relationship in Assisting Offenders to Desist from Crime', Probation Journal52(3): 221-42.
6.
Chinman, M.J., R. Rosenheck and J.A. Lam (2000) `The Case Management Relationship and Outcomes of Homeless Persons With Serious Mental Illness', Psychiatric Services51(9): 1142-47.
7.
Cormack, D. (ed.) (2000) The Research Process in Nursing, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
Crisis (2005a) A Literature Review: Access to Mainstream Public Services for Homeless People: A Report for Crisis prepared by the Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion. London: Crisis.
10.
Crisis (2005b) Memorandum Submitted by Crisis to the Select Committee on Home Affairs. London : United Kingdom Parliament. URL (acccessed March 2006): http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmhaff/80ii/80we15.htm
11.
Department of Health (2000) Effective Care Co-ordination in Mental Health Services, Modernising the Care Programme Approach. London: Department of Health Publications.
12.
Edmunds, M., M. Hough, P. Turnbull and T. May (1999) Doing Justice to Treatment: Referring Offenders to Treatment. London: Home Office .
13.
Eley, S., K. Gallop, G. McIvor, K. Morgan and R. Yates (2002) Drug Treatment and Testing Orders: Evaluation of the Scottish Pilots. Edinburgh: The Stationery Office.
14.
Falk, C. (2004) `Are DTTOs Working? Issues of Policy, Implementation and Practice', Probation Journal51(4): 398-406.
15.
Fountain, J., S. Howes and J. Strang (2003) `Unmet Drug and Alcohol Service Needs of Homeless People in London: A Complex Issue', Substance Use and Misuse , 38: 377-93.
16.
Fountain, J., S. Howes, J. Marsden and J. Strang (2002) `Who Uses Services for Homeless People? An Investigation Amongst People Sleeping Rough in London', Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology12: 71-5.
17.
Gelberg, L., T.C. Gallagher, R.M. Andersen and P. Koegel (1997) `Competing Priorities as a Barrier to Medical Care among Homeless Adults in Los Angeles', American Journal of Public Health87: 217-20.
18.
Gossop, M., J. Marsden and D. Stewart (2001) NTORS After Five Years - The National Treatment Outcome Study - Changes in Substance Use, Health and Criminal Behaviour During the Five Years After Intake. London: National Addiction Centre.
19.
Griffiths, S. (2002) Addressing the Health Needs of Rough Sleepers. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
20.
Hart, C. (2005) Doing Your Masters Dissertation, 1st Edition. London: SAGE.
21.
HM Inspectorate of Probation (2005) An Inspection of National Probation Service Work on Offender Accommodation . London: Home Office.
22.
Home Office (1995) Tackling Drugs Together. London: HMSO.
23.
Home Office (1998) Tackling Drugs to Build a Better Britain. London: The Stationery Office.
24.
Home Office (2002) The National Standards for the Supervision of Offenders in the Community. London: The Home Office.
25.
Home Office Drugs Strategy Directorate and Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2005) Housing Support Options for People Who Misuse Substances. London: Home Office Drugs Strategy Directorate and Office of the Deputy Prime Minister .
26.
Homeless Link (2006) Training Links, Homeless Link. URL (accessed March 2006): http://www.homeless.org.uk/developyourservice/training/links
27.
Kemshall, H. and R. Canton (2002) The Effective Management of Programme Attrition - Report for the National Probation Service (Welsh Region). Leicester: De Montford University.
28.
LoBiondo-Wood, G. and J. Haber (2002) Nursing Research, Methods, Critical Appraisal and Utilization, 5th Edition. St Louis, MO: Mosby.
29.
McSweeney, T., A. Stevens, N. Hunt and P. Turnbull (2007) `Twisting Arms or a Helping Hand? Assessing the Impact of "Coerced" and Comparable "Voluntary" Drug Treatment Options', British Journal of Criminology47(3): 470-90.
30.
Malloch, M. (2004) `Missing Out: Gender, Drugs and Justice', Probation51(4): 259-308.
31.
Marlatt, G.A. and J.R. Gordon (1985) Relapse Prevention, Maintenance Strategies in the Treatment of Addictive Behaviours. New York: Guilford Press.
32.
Meier, P.S., C. Barrowclough and M.C. Donmall (2005) `The Role of the Therapeutic Alliance in the Treatment of Substance Misuse: A Critical Review of the Literature', Addiction100(3): 304-16.
33.
Meier, P.S., M.C. Donmall, P. McElduff, C. Barrowclough and R. Heller (2005) `The Role of the Early Therapeutic Alliance in Predicting Drug Treatment Dropout', Drug and Alcohol Dependence83(1):57-64.
34.
Miller, W.R. and S. Rollnick (2002) Motivational Interviewing Preparing People For Change, 2nd Edition. New York : The Guilford Press.
35.
Mistral, W. and M. Hollingworth (2001) `The Supervised Methadone and Resettlement Team Nurse: An Effective Approach to Opiate Dependent Homeless People', International Nursing Review48(2): 122-8.
36.
National Offender Management Service (2005 ) Strategy for the Management and Treatment of Problematic Drug Users within the Correctional Services. London: National Offender Management Service.
37.
National Offender Management Service (2006 ) The NOMS Offender Management Model. London : National Offender Management Service.
38.
National Offender Management Service (2007 ) How We Manage Offending - Accommodation. URL (accessed June 2007): http://www.noms.homeoffice.gov.uk/managing-offenders/reducing-re-offending/accommodation/
39.
National Probation Directorate (2004) DTTOS/DRRS Advice and Information about Changes and Future Arrangements, Probation Circular 55/2004. London: National Probation Directorate.
40.
National Probation Directorate (2005a) Effective Management of the Drug Rehabilitation Requirement (DRR) and Alcohol Treatment Requirement (ATR), Probation Circular 57/2005. London: National Probation Directorate.
41.
National Probation Directorate (2005b) National Standards 2005 - Probation, Circular 15/2005. London: National Probation Directorate.
42.
National Probation Directorate (2006) Voluntary, Community and Private Sector Alliances, Probation Circular 07/2006 . London: National Probation Directorate .
43.
National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse ( 2002) Models of Care for the Treatment of Drug Misusers. London: National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse .
44.
National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse ( 2005) Care Planning Toolkit Consultation Draft. London: National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse .
45.
Neale, J. (2001) `Homelessness amongst Drug Users: A Double Jeopardy Explored', International Journal of Drug Policy12: 353-69.
46.
Newburn, T. and P. Rock (2005) Living in Fear: Violence and Victimisation in the Lives of Single Homeless People. London: Crisis.
47.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2004) Homelessness Statistics December 2003 and Addressing the Health Needs of Homeless People Policy Brief, Policy Briefing 7. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
48.
Quinn, C. and A. Barton (2000) `The Implications of Drug Treatment and Testing Orders', Nursing Standard14(27): 38-41.
49.
Ramsden, J. and R. Turner (2005) `Retaining Offenders on the DTTO: Comparing Profiles of `Completers' and `Failures to Comply'. West Yorkshire : Research Unit, National Probation Service. URL (accessed May 2006): http://www.westyorksprobation.org.uk/pages/research.php?subject=DRUGS
50.
Randall, G. and S. Brown (2002) Helping Rough Sleepers off the Streets. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
51.
Randall, G. and DrugScope (2002) Drug Services for Homeless People. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
52.
Ricketts, T., P. Bliss, K. Murphy and C. Brooker (2005) `Engagement with Drug Treatment and Testing Orders: A Qualitative Study', Addiction Research and Theory13(1): 65-78.
53.
Robinson, E. (2003) Failing DTTOs? Breach Cause, Partial Impact, and Follow-on Processes for Part-completers. West Yorkshire : National Probation Service.
54.
Rosenblum, A., S. Magura, D.J. Kayman and C. Fong (2005) `Motivationally Enhanced Group Counseling for Substance Users in a Soup Kitchen: A Randomized Clinical Trial', Drug and Alcohol Dependence80(1): 91-103.
55.
Royal College of Psychiatrists and Royal College of Physicians (2000) Drugs Dilemmas and Choices. London: Gaskell.
56.
Stimson, G.V. (2000) `"Blair Declares War": The Unhealthy State of British Drug Policy', International Journal of Drug Policy11: 259-64.
57.
Turnbull, P.J., T. McSweeney, R. Webster, M. Edmunds and M. Hough (2000) Drug Treatment and Testing Orders: Final Evaluation Report, Home Office Research Study 212. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
58.
Turner, R. (2002) `Does DTTO Assessment Intensity Affect Retention? A Comparison between West Yorkshire Districts on "Time to Drop-Out" for DTTO Offenders'. West Yorkshire: National Probation Service. URL (accessed May 2006): http://www.westyorksprobation.org.uk/pages/research.php?subject=DRUGS
59.
Turner, R. (2004) `The Impact of Drug Treatment and Testing Orders in West Yorkshire: Six-month Outcomes', Probation Journal51(2): 116-32.
60.
Turning Point (2004) Routes into Treatment - Drugs and Crime. London: Turning Point.
61.
United Kingdom Government (2005) Drugs Strategy - Key Facts, Home Office Drug Strategy Directorate. URL (accessed June 2005): http://www.drugs.gov.uk/
62.
United Kingdom Parliament (2003) The Criminal Justice Act 2003. London: HMSO.
63.
Ward, T., A. Day, K. Howells and A. Birgden (2004) `The Multifactor Offender Readiness Model', Aggression and Violent Behavior9: 645-73.
64.
Wincup, E., G. Buckland and R. Bayliss (2003) `Youth Homelessness and Substance Use', Report to the Drugs and Alcohol Research Unit, Home Office Research Study 258. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
65.
Wright, N.M.J. and C.N.E. Tompkins (2006) `How Can Health Services Effectively Meet the Health Needs of Homeless People?', British Journal of General Practice56: 286-93.
