Abstract
This article outlines the findings of a small study based in one probation area which considered the factors that may impact on quality assessment when using OASys (Offender Assessment System). Following a brief outline of the organizational and broader context in which OASys is used, the study explores the findings of case studies, survey questionnaires and interviews undertaken with Probation Officers. Tentative conclusions are drawn about the factors which emerge as affecting quality in assessment and suggestions are offered for further study. The article concludes by welcoming the strategic initiatives currently being undertaken to improve assessment and management of risk but suggests that the use of top-down initiatives alone, combined with an emphasis on risk management and containment, may serve to undermine ownership of the aspiration to risk reduction and, in the long term, threatens the loss of skills necessary for effective assessment and management of risk.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
