Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The suspended sentence, along with the fine, is the most commonly used alternative to prison in Spain. This sentence is generally regarded as a good sanction because it avoids the personal and financial costs of prison for occasional offenders which are not in need of rehabilitation. The main aim of this article is to present data and empirical research about the effectiveness of the suspended sentence with respect to its two main goals: reducing the use of prison and preventing offenders from re-offending. The data appear to suggest that this is an effective sentence in these terms, but the article also raises questions about the need to replace suspended sentences with more rehabilitative orders in some special cases.

Keywords

decarceration recidivism Spain suspended sentence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashworth, A. (2001) ‘The Decline of English Sentencing and Other Stories’, in M. Tonry & R.S. Frase (eds) Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries, pp. 62-91. New York: Oxford University Press .

Bottoms, A.E. (1981) ‘The Suspended Sentence in England, 1967-1978’ , British Journal of Criminology 21 (4): 1-26 .

Cid, J. (2005) ‘The Penitentiary System in Spain: The Use of Imprisonment, Living Conditions and Rehabilitation’ , Punishment & Society 7 (2): 147-166 .

Cid, J., E. Larrauri, G. Escobar, J. Lahoz, M. López i Ferrer, B. Tébar & D. Varona (eds) (2002) Jueces penales y penas en España (Aplicación de las penas alternativas a la privación de libertad). Valencia: Tirant lo blanch.

Farrall, S. (2002) Rethinking What Works with Offenders. Probation, Social Context and Desistance from Crime. Devon: Willan .

Lappi-Seppälä, T. (2001) ‘Sentencing and Punishment in Finland: The Decline of the Repressive Ideal’, in M. Tonry & R.S. Frase (eds) Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries, pp. 92-150. New York: Oxford University Press .

Luque, M.E., M. Ferrer & M. Capdevila (2004) La reincidencia penitenciaria a Catalunya. Barcelona: Centre d’Estudis Jurídics i Formació Especialitzada.

May, C. (1999) Explaining Reconviction Following a Community Sentence: The Role of Social Factors. London: Home Office .

Petersilia, J. (1997) ‘Probation in the United States’, in M. Tonry (ed.) Crime and Justice. An Annual Review of Research (22): 149-200.

10.

Roberts, J.V. & T. Gabor (2004) ‘Living in the Shadow of Prison. Lessons from the Canadian Experience of Decarceration’ , British Journal of Criminology 44 (1): 92-112 .

11.

Tak, P. (2001) ‘Sentencing and Punishment in the Netherlands’, in M. Tonry & R.S. Frase (eds) Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries, pp. 188-221. New York: Oxford University Press .

12.

Von Hirsch, A. , A.E. Bottoms , E. Burney & P.-O. Wikström (1999) Criminal Deterrence and Sentence Severity. An Analysis of Recent Research. Oxford: Hart Publishing .

13.

Von Liszt, F. (1995 [1882]) Der Zweckgedanke in Strafrecht (La idea del fin en el Derecho Penal). Granada: Comares.

14.

Wasik, M. & A. Von Hirsch (1988) ‘Non-Custodial Penalties and the Principles of Desert’ , The Criminal Law Review (September): 555-572 .

15.

Wasik, M. (1994) ‘Sentencing Guidelines: The Problem of Conditional Sentences’ , Criminal Justice Ethics (Winter/Spring): 50-57 .

16.

Weigend, T. (2001) ‘Sentencing and Punishment in Germany’, in M. Tonry & R.S. Frase (eds) Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries, pp. 188-221. New York: Oxford University Press .

Suspended sentences in Spain: Decarceration and recidivism

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References