Chenery, S. and Pease, K. (2000) The Burnley/Dordrecht Initiative Final Report (Unpublished). Burnley: University of Huddersfield/Safer Cities Partnership.
2.
Cullen, J. and Hills, D. (1996) The Role of Randomised Control Trials in Assessing Service Effectiveness. London: The Tavistock Institute Edru.
3.
Feeley, M. and Simon, J. (1992) ‘The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections And Its Implications’, in Criminology30, pp.449-474.
4.
Harland, A. (ed) (1996) Choosing Correctional Options That Work. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
5.
Heaton, R. (2000) ‘The Prospects for Intelligence-Led Policing: Some Historical and Quantitative Considerations’, in Policing And Society9, pp.337-355.
6.
Hope, T. , Worrall, A., Dunkerton, L. and Leacock, V. (2001) The Newcastle Prolific Offenders Project Final Evaluation Report (Unpublished). Keele University/Staffordshire Probation Area.
7.
Hough, M. and Chapman, T. (1998) Evidence-Based Practice. London: Home Office.
8.
Maguire, M. (2000) ‘Policing By Risks and Targets: Some Dimensions and Implications of Intelligence-Led Control’, in Policing And Society9, pp.315-336.
9.
Nash, M. (1999) ‘Enter The “Polibation Officer”’, in International Journal Of Police Science and Management1 (4), pp.360-368.
10.
Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997) Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.
11.
Piquero, A. (1998) ‘Applying An Evaluability Assessment Tool To Community-Based Programs In Pittsburgh’, in The Prison Journal78 (1), pp.74-89.
12.
Phillips, C. , Considine, M. and Lewis, R. (2000) A Review of Audits and Strategies Produced by Crime and Disorder Partnerships in 1999. Briefing Note 8/00. London: Policing And Reducing Crime Unit, Home Office.
13.
Staffordshire Probation Area (2001) When The Carrot Meets The Stick... .Stafford.
14.
Walton, D. (2000) ‘Driving Down Prolific Offending’, in Prison Service Journal131, pp.25-27.