“Creative Solutions” To Women’s Offending: An Evaluation Of The Women’s Probation Centre

Bloom, B. (2000) Gender Responsive Programming for Women Offenders; Guiding Principles and Practices. Correctional Service of Canada.

Dowden, C. and Andrews, D.A. (1999) ‘What Works for Female Offenders: a Meta-analytic Review’, in Crime and Delinquency 45 (4), pp.438-452.

Home Office (2001) Probation Circular 92/2001: What Works Implementation 3. London: Home Office.

Lloyd, C. , Mair, G. and Hough, M. (1995) Explaining Reconviction Rates: A Critical Analysis’, Home Office Research Study 136. London: Home Office.

Mair, G. (2000) ‘Reflections: Credible Accreditation?’, in Probation Journal 47 (4), pp 268-271.

Maguire, M. , Raynor, P. , Vanstone, M. and Kynchy, J. (1998) ‘Voluntary Aftercare’, Home Office Research Findings No 73. London: Home Office.

Miller, M.L. (1990) Perceptions of Available and Needed Programs by Female Offenders in Delaware. Delaware Center for Justice.

Morash, M. , Bynum, T.S. and Koons, B.A. (1998) Women Offenders: P rogramming Needs and Promising Approaches. U.S. National Institute of Justice Brief.

Rex, S.A. (1999) ‘Desistance from Offending: Experiences of Probation’, in Howard Journal 38, pp.366-383.

Rex, S.A. (2001) ‘Beyond Cognitive Behaviouralism? Reflections on the Effectiveness Literature’, in A. Bottoms , L. Gelsthorpe and S. Rex (eds) Community Penalties: Change and Challenges. Cullompton: Willan.

Rumgay, J. (1996) ‘Women Offenders: Towards Needs-based Policy’, in Vista 2 (2), pp. 104-111.

Stableforth, N.L. (2000) Effective Corrections for Women Offenders. Correctional Service of Canada.

Stephens, K. and Brown, I. (2001) ‘OGRS2 in Practice: An Elastic Ruler?’, in Probation Journal 48 (3), pp.163-172.

Tarling, R. (1993) Analysing Offending: Data, Models and Interpretations. London: HMSO.

Wolfe, T. (1999) Counting the Cost: The Social and Financial Consequences of Women ’s Imprisonment. Report for the Wedderburn Committee on Women ’s Imprisonment.