Crosland, P. (2000) Researching with Probation, Police and Offenders Index Data: the Gaps and Questions Arising. Presentation at University of Cambridge, Institute of Criminology, Conviction Information Symposium.
2.
Friendship, C. (2000) A Small Reliability Study Between OI and NIS Data. Presentation at University of Cambridge, Institute of Criminology, Conviction Information Symposium.
3.
Friendship, C. , Thornton, D., Erikson, M., and Beech, A. (2001) Reconviction: A Critique and Comparison of Two Main Data Sources in England and Wales, in Legal and Criminological Psychology6, pp. 121-129.
4.
Home Office (2000) Review of Crime Statistics: A Discussion Document. London: HMSO.
5.
Lloyd, C. , Mair, G. and Hough, M. (1994) Explaining Reconviction Rates: A Critical Analysis. Home Office Research Study 136. London: HMSO.
6.
May, C. (1999) Explaining Reconviction Following a Community Sentence: The Role of Social Factors. Home Office Research Study 192. London: Home Office.
7.
Perry, D. and Johnson, C. (2000) What Works Strategy for the Probation Service. London: Home Office, What Works Strategy Group.
8.
Povey, K. (2000) On the Record: Thematic Inspection Report on Police Crime Recording, the Police National Computer and Phoenix Intelligence System Data Quality. London: Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary.
9.
Roberts, C. (2000) Symposium on Pathfinder Evaluation. Presentation at `Making Information Work for Practitioners', ACOP/NPRIE National Probation Research and Information Conference.
