George Mair critiques the purpose, make-up and effectiveness of the Prison/Probation Accreditation Panel.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Chapman, T. and Hough, M. (1998) Evidence Based Practice. London : Home Office.
2.
Home Office (1999a) Probation Circular 35/1999: Crime Reduction Programme- Pathfinder Selection. London: Home Office.
3.
Home Office (1999b) Probation Circular 43/1999: Joint Prison Probation Accreditation Panel. London: Home Office.
4.
Home Office (2000) Probation Circular 40/2000: What Works: Joint Prison Probation Accreditation Panel - Update. London: Home Office.
5.
Mair, G. (1995) 'Specialist Activities in Probation: Confusion Worse Confounded', in Noaks, L., Levi, M. and Maguire, M. (Eds.) Contemporary Issues in Criminology. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
6.
Underdown, A. (1998) Strategies for Effective Offender Supervision. London: Home Office.
