Anita Gibbs and Russell Beal combine practice and academic insights to evaluate the recently implemented Straight Thinking Programme in New Zealand. They examine a range of issues, including the cultural appropriateness of a programme developed essentially in the UK and North American context.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bishop, R. (1996) Collaborative Research Stories. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
2.
Department of Corrections (1999) Straight Thinking Fact Sheet. Wellington, New Zealand.
3.
Durie, M. (1994) 'Maori and the State', in Social Work Review7 (1), pp.2-5.
4.
McClaren, K. (1999) Cutting Down on Crime. Winston Churchill Fellowship Report. Wellington, NZ.
5.
Pratt, J. (1994) 'Crime, Deviance and Punishment', in Spoonley, P., Pearson, D. & Shirley, I. (Eds) New Zealand Society. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
6.
Pratt, J. (2000) 'The Return of the Wheelbarrow Men; or, the Arrival of Postmodern Penality', in British Journal of Criminology40 (1), pp.127-145.
7.
Raynor, P. & Vanstone, M. (1997) Straight Thinking on Probation (STOP). Probation Studies Unit Report No. 4. Oxford University: Probation Studies Unit.
8.
Roscoe, M. (1998) 'What Works with Drink-drivers?' in Probation Journal45, pp.12-147.
9.
Ross, R., Fabiano, E. & Ewles, C. (1988) 'Reasoning and Rehabilitation', in International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology32, pp.29-35.
