Mike Nellis argues that while 'Community Punishment and Rehabilitation Service' can be opposed on numerous levels, the name 'Probation Service' has also outlived its usefulness. He makes the case for the 'Community Justice Service', reasoning that such a title is not only more accurate, but that it can meet the needs of both probation staff and the Home Office.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bazemore, G. (1997) 'The "Community" in Community Justice; Issues, Themes and Questions for the New Neighbourhood Sanctioning Models', in Justice System Quarterly19(2), pp.193-228.
2.
Cavadino, M., Crow, I. and Dignan, J. (2000) Criminal Justice 2000: Strategies for a New Century . Winchester: Waterside Press.
3.
Duff, A. (1999) 'Penal Communities', in Punishment and Society1(1), pp.27-44.
4.
Home Office (1998) Joining Forces to Protect the Public. The Prisons-Probation Review. London: Home Office.
5.
Nellis, M. (1998) 'Community Justice: a New Name for the Probation Service', in Justice of the Peace Vol 16, 25 April 1998, pp.319-320.
6.
Nellis, M. (2000) 'Creating Community Justice', in Pease, K., Ballantyne, S. and Mclaren, V. (Eds) What Works in Crime Prevention. London: IPPR (forthcoming).
