In cities marked by conflict, inequality, and segregation, the examination of in-between spaces provides valuable insights into the socio-spatial dynamics amidst polarised communities. These in-between spaces serve as arenas where contested territories intersect, yet their potential to adapt and transform remains underexplored. This research employs a comparative case study to scrutinise the in-between spaces of Belfast, Northern Ireland, and Caracas, Venezuela. Both cities are marked by enduring legacies of conflict, political upheaval, and identity complexities. By embracing contingency as a theoretical framework, this study investigates how transitions influence in-between spaces within divided contexts, leading on the concept of permanent resistance. The findings reveal that in-between spaces embody characteristics of liminality and interaction associated with identity and vulnerability, enabling them to adjust and react to contextual flux. By bridging global perspectives, this interdisciplinary inquiry offers critical insights of how contextual disruptions interact within divided cities, and the interplay between contingency, urban transitions, and in-betweenness aimed at transcending enduring divisions.
BollensS (2012) City and Soul in Divided Societies. London, UK : Routledge.
9.
BrennerN (1998) Between fixity and motion: Accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space16(5): 459–481.
10.
BrennerNMarcussePMayerM (2012) Cities for People, Not for Profit Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City (eds N Brenner, P Marcuse, and M Mayer). London, UK: Routledge.
11.
BrownS (1985) Central Belfast’s security segment: An urban phenomenon. Area17(1): 1–9.
CalameJCharlesworthE (2011) Divided Cities: Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem, Mostar, and Nicosia.
14.
Caraballo CorreaPA (2019) Caracas Heterotópica. Espacios identitarios y fronteras simbólicas. Revista mexicana de Sociología81(1): 37–61.
15.
CeciliaLTimmerC (2008) La dualización urbana como resultado del proceso globalizador. Caracas, 1980-2007.
16.
Ciccariello-MaherG (2016) The dialectics of urban space in Caracas. Contemporary Political Theory15(4): 436–445. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
17.
CosstickV (2015) Belfast: Toward a City without Walls. Newtownards, Northern Ireland, UK: Colourpoint Books.
18.
CoylesDHamberBGrantA (2023) Hidden barriers and divisive architecture: The role of “everyday space” in conflict and peacebuilding in Belfast. Journal of Urban Affairs45(6): 1057–1080. Taylor and Francis Ltd.
19.
DeLandaM (2019) A New Philosophy of Society. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
20.
Delfino M de los Á (2001) La gobernabilidad de Caracas capital y el distrito metropolitano. Urbana6(29): 35–45.
21.
ErnstsonHVan Der LeeuwSERedmanCL, et al. (2010) Urban transitions: On urban resilience and human-dominated ecosystems. AMBIO39(39): 531–545.
22.
Essex Planning Officers Association (1973) Essex Design Guide for Residential Areas.
23.
FaríasIBenderT, eds. (2012) Urban Assemblages (eds I Farías and T Bender). London, UK: Routledge.
24.
GaffikinFKarelseCMorrisseyM, et al. (2016) Making Space for Each Other: Civic Place-Making in a Divided Society. Northern Ireland, UK: Belfast.
25.
GaffikinFMcEldowneyMSterrettK (2010) Creating shared public space in the contested city: The role of urban design. Journal of Urban Design15(4): 493–513. Routledge.
26.
GaffikinFMorrisseyM (2011) Planning in Divided Cities: Collaborative Shaping of Contested Space.
27.
García AlcarazT (2022) Intertwining the City : The In-Between Spaces of Caracas as Scenarios to Achieve Urban Togetherness. Barcelona, Spain: TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa). Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Epub ahead of print 2022.
28.
García AlcarazT (2024) Embracing throwntogetherness: Unravelling the relational dynamics of borderlands in divided cities. Cities150: 105048. Pergamon.
29.
HackettM (2019) Driving the social divide: Planning in Belfast reinforces the city’s segregation. The Islands of Ireland: The Architectural Review Issue1462, June.
30.
HarveyD (2013) Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London, UK: Verso Books.
31.
HaydnFTemelR (2006) Temporary Urban Spaces : Concepts for the Use of City Spaces. Basel: Birkhäuser.
32.
Herrera NapoleónC (2011) Caracas, ciudad histórica diversa: Aproximación a la valoración espaciotemporal de los tejidos urbanos. Bitácora Urbano-Territorial, ISSN-e 0124–7913, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2011 (Ejemplar Dedicado a: Construcción de Jurisprudencia y Políticas Públicas Sobre lo Urbano y lo Territorial), 21–3719(2). Instituto de Investigaciones de Hábitat, Ciudad y Territorio: 21–37.
33.
HouJ (2020) Guerrilla urbanism: Urban design and the practices of resistance. URBAN DESIGN International25: 117–125.
34.
IvesonK (2013) Cities within the city: Do-it-yourself urbanism and the right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research37(3): 941–956.
35.
JarmanN (2005) Changing Places, Moving Boundaries: The Development of New Interface Areas. Epub ahead of print 2005.
36.
JonesB (2014) Ensuring a political space for conflict by applying Chantal Mouffe to post-war reconstruction and development. Progress in Development Studies14(3): 249–259.
37.
JosephEB (1995) Changing the residential street scene: Adapting the shared street (woonerf) concept to the suburban environment. Journal of the American Planning Association61(4): 504–515. Taylor & Francis Group.
38.
LangLMellI (2020) ‘I stick to this side of the park’: Parks as shared spaces in contemporary Belfast. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space3(2): 503–526. Sage Publications Inc.
39.
López-MayaM (2002) Venezuela after the Caracazo: Forms of protest in a deinstitutionalized context. Bulletin of Latin American Research21(2): 199–218.
40.
MárquezP (1999) The Street Is My Home. Youth and Violence in Caracas.
41.
MasseyD (1994) Space, Place and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell and Polity Press. Available at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=cequBgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=uHa2yGA8gY&sig=AHPnsGRj3G-WYUZlcwc4OAVuT2I (accessed 10 August 2023).
42.
MasseyD (2005) For Space. London, UK: Sage Publications.
43.
MeerowSNewellJPStultsM (2016) Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning147: 38–49. Elsevier.
44.
MohammadR (2017) Feminist geography. In: RichardsonDCastreeNGoodchildM (eds) The International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment, and Technology. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
45.
MouffeC (2007) Artistic activism and agonistic spaces.Art & Research. A Journal of Ideas, Context and Methods1(2). Elsevier.
46.
MurtaghB (2001) The Politics of Territory. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
47.
MurtaghB (2020) Belfast’s peace lines and potential directions for local planning. In: Boal FW (eds) Ethnicity and Housing: 190–197, 1st ed. Routledge, p. 8.
48.
NagleJ (2009) Sites of social centrality and segregation: Lefebvre in Belfast, a ‘divided city’. Antipode41(2): 326–347.
49.
Newman Oscar (1973) Defensible Space : People and Design in the Violent City. New York: Architectural Press. 264.
50.
Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency (2022) Census 2021 Main Statistics for Northern Ireland - Statistical Bulletin - Demography and Households.
51.
PeñaMIGonzález VisoIVegasF (2015) Caracas Del Valle al Mar. Guía de Arquitectura y Paisaje (ed. Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Fomento y Vivienda), 1st ed.Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela.
52.
PullanW (2011) Frontier urbanism: The periphery at the centre of contested cities. Journal of Architecture16(1): 15–35. Routledge.
53.
PullanW (2013) Spatial discontinuities: Conflict infrastructures in contested cities. In: Locating Urban Conflicts. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 17–36.
54.
QianJ (2020) Geographies of public space: Variegated publicness, variegated epistemologies. Progress in Human Geography44(1): 77–98.
StavridesS (2006) Heterotopias and the experience of porous urban space. In: FranckKStevensQ (eds) Loose Space. London, UK: Routledge.
65.
SterrettKHackettMHillD (2012) The social consequences of broken urban structures: A case study of Belfast. Journal of Transport Geography21: 49–61. Pergamon.
66.
TonkissF (2013) Austerity urbanism and the makeshift city. City17(3): 312–324. Routledge.
67.
TonnelatS (2008) `Out of frame’: The (in)visible life of urban interstices — A case study in Charenton-le-Pont, Paris, France. Ethnography9(3): 291–324.
68.
WilsonY (2020) Le Logement social au XXIe siècle au Venezuela : l’État après la catastrophe. Cahiers de la recherche architecturale, urbaine et paysagère8.
WolframM (2016) Conceptualizing urban transformative capacity: A framework for research and policy. Cities51: 121–130. Pergamon.
71.
YiftachelOYacobiH (2003) Urban ethnocracy: Ethnicization and the production of space in an Israeli ‘mixed city’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space21(6): 673–693.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
