This in-depth case study examines the grassroots movement that coalesced between 2014–2019 to contest the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) in Iowa. We investigate how Iowa organizers from the Bakken Pipeline Resistance Coalition, Mississippi Stand, and Little Creek Camp employed diverse actions to resist DAPL including participation in the Iowa Utilities Board permitting process, a legal challenge, protests, and sabotage. Drawing on data collection and fieldwork conducted between 2020–2023, we argue that the transgressive movement used insurgent planning to transform Iowa's energy landscape, provoking a strong response from the state including surveillance and a “Critical Infrastructure Bill”. We demonstrate that Iowa organizers traversed invited and invented spaces, creating a resistance toolbox used in contemporary energy contests. This case study unsettles the idea that organizers must work either within or outside state-led institutions to enact change; expands the geographical focus of insurgent planning; and uses an intersectional lens to make visible the work of women, Indigenous, and rural organizers in Iowa.
AbersRNvon BülowM (2018) Social movements and the state: conventional and contentious politics. In: AmesB (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Brazilian Politics. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge, 105–118.
AndersonSJohnsonM (2024) The spatial and scalar politics of a just energy transition in Illinois. Political Geography 112: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103128
5.
Bakken Pipeline Resistance Coalition (n.d.) Who we are. Bakken Pipeline Resistance Coalition. Available at: https://nobakken.com/about/ (accessed 4 February 2025).
6.
BallerCRBellSE (2024) An ecosystem of tactics: Bridging the radical and moderate flanks in a pipeline resistance movement. Energy Research & Social Science117: 103714.
BellS (2013) Our Roots Run Deep as Ironweed: Appalachian Women and the Fight for Environmental Justice. Champaign, Illinois, USA: University of Illinois Press.
9.
BlühdornI (2020) The legitimation crisis of democracy: Emancipatory politics, the environmental state and the glass ceiling to socio-ecological transformation. Environmental Politics29(1): 38–57.
10.
BlühdornIButzlaffF (2020) Democratization beyond the post-democratic turn: Towards a research agenda on new conceptions of citizen participation. Democratization27(3): 369–388.
11.
BondiBHorowitzL (2024) Scope-shifting: Bureaucracy, energy justice and the Dakota Access Pipeline. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space7(2): 479–974.
12.
BosworthK (2022) Pipeline Populism: Grassroots Environmentalism in the Twenty-First Century. Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA: University of Minnesota Press.
13.
BosworthKChuaC (2023) The countersovereignty of critical infrastructure security: Settler-state anxiety versus the pipeline blockade. Antipode55(5): 1345–1367.
14.
BridgeGÖzkaynakBTurhanE (2018) Energy infrastructure and the fate of the nation: Introduction to special issue. Energy Research & Social Science41: 1–11.
BuckHJ (2022) Mining the air: Political ecologies of the circular carbon economy. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space5(3): 1086–1105.
19.
BurrellMGrosseCMarkB (2022) Resistance to petro-hegemony: A three terrains of power analysis of the line 3 tar sands pipeline in Minnesota. Energy Research & Social Science91: 102724.
20.
CarterAKruzicA (2017) Centering the commons, creating space for the collective: Ecofeminist #NoDAPL praxis in Iowa. Journal of Social Justice7: 1–22.
21.
CarterAKruzicA (2019) ‘No oil in our soil!’ Shifting narratives from commodities to the commons in Iowa, USA. In: DevlinJF (ed.) Social Movements Contesting Natural Resource Development. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge, 112–132.
22.
Castillo JaraEBrunsA (2022) Contested notions of energy justice and energy futures in struggles over tar sands development in British Columbia, Canada. Futures 138: 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2022.102921
23.
ChilversJBellamyRPallettH, et al. (2021) A systemic approach to mapping participation with low-carbon energy transitions. Nature Energy6: 250–259.
24.
CrenshawK (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum1989(1): Article 8.
25.
Docket No. HLP-2014-0001 (2015a) Direct Testimony of Gene Takle. Available at: https://efs.iowa.gov/filing/2789825 (accessed 16 October 2024).
26.
Docket No. HLP-2014-0001 (2015b) Direct Testimony of James E. Hansen. Available at: https://efs.iowa.gov/filing/2789890 (accessed 16 October 2024).
Docket No. HLP- 2014-0001 (n.d) Docket No. HLP-2014-0001 Summary. Available at: https://efs.iowa.gov/docket/2670366 (accessed 16 October 2024).
30.
DunlapATornelC (2023) Pluralizing energy justice? Towards cultivating an unruly, autonomous and insurrectionary research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science 103: 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2023.103217
EstesN (2019) Our History is the Future: Standing Rock versus the Dakota Access Pipeline and the Long Tradition of Indigenous Resistance. New York, USA: Verso.
FordeS (2024) Spatial intersectionality and transformative justice as frameworks for equitable urban planning in divided and post-conflict cities. Cities 147: 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2024.104796
García-Lamarca (2017) From occupying plazas to recuperating housing: Insurgent practices in Spain. Internation Journal of Urban and Regional Research41(1): 37–53.
HolstonJ (2009) Insurgent citizenship in an era of global urban peripheries. City and Society21(2): 245–267.
46.
HorowitzL (2023) The double movement and the triple-helix: Divestment, decommodification, and the Dakota Access Pipeline. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space55(6): 1337–1354.
47.
HuqE (2020) Seeing the insurgent in transformative planning practices. Planning Theory19(4): 371–391.
JohnsonAEWilkinsonKK (2020) All We Can Save: Truth, Courage, and Solutions for the Climate Crisis. London, UK: One World.
56.
JohnsonH (2017) #NoDAPL: Social media, empowerment, and civic participation at standing rock. Library Trends66(2): 155–175.
57.
JohnsonMJSveinsdóttirAGGuskeEL (2021) The Dakota Access Pipeline in Illinois: Participation, power, and institutional design in United States critical energy infrastructure governance. Energy Research & Social Science73: 101908.
58.
KashiaM (2018) The making of a climate action warrior. In: DáilPWWellsBL (eds) We Rise to Resist: Voices from a New Era of Women’s Political Action. North Carolina, USA: McFarland, 110–115.
59.
Keith Puntenney, Laverne I. Johnson, Richard R. Lamb, Marian D. Johnson, Northwest Iowa Landowners Association, Iowa Farmland Owners Association, Inc., and the Sierra Club Iowa Chapter, Appellants, v. Iowa Utilities Board, Appellee, and Office of Consumer Advocate and The Main Coalition, Appellees, and Dakota Access, LLC, Appellee, Iowa Supreme Court Case No. 17-0423 (2019) Available at: https://www.iowacourts.gov/iowa-courts/supreme-court/supreme-court-opinions/case/17-0423 (accessed 16 October 2024).
60.
LaskeyABNichollsW (2019) Jumping off the ladder: Participation and insurgency in Detroit’s urban planning. Journal of the American Planning Association85(3): 348–362.
61.
LeQuesneT (2019) Petro-hegemony and the matrix of resistance: What can Standing Rock’s Water Protectors teach us about organizing for climate justice in the United States?Environmental Sociology5(2): 188–206.
MalmA (2021) How to Blow Up a Pipeline: Learning to Fight in a World on Fire. New York, USA: Verso.
64.
MengdenWH (2017) Indigenous people, human rights, and consultation: The Dakota Access Pipeline. Am. Indian Law Rev41(2): 441–466.
65.
MethP (2010) Unsettling insurgency: Reflections on women’s insurgent practices in South Africa. Planning Theory & Practice11(2): 241–263.
66.
MildenbergerM (2020) Carbon Captured: How Business and Labor Control Climate Politics. Massachusetts, USA: The MIT Press.
67.
MiraftabF (2009) Insurgent planning: Situating radical planning in the global south. Planning Theory8(1): 32–50.
68.
MitchellT (2011) Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil. New York, USA: Verso.
69.
NeubertC (2020) The Anthropocene stinks! Odor, affect, and the entangled politics of livestock waste in a rural Iowa watershed. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space38(4): 736–752.
70.
NovoaM (2018) Insurgency, heritage and the working class: The case of the Theatre of Union No6 of the Coal Miners of Lota, Chile. International Journal of Heritage Studies24(4): 354–373.
71.
NovoaM (2022) INSURGENT HERITAGE: Mobilizing memory, place-based care and cultural citizenships. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research46: 1016–1034.
72.
OjedaD (2023) Feminist thought and environmental defense in Latin America. In: BustosBEngel-Di MauroSGarcía-LópezG, et al (eds) Routledge Handbook of Latin America and the Environment. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge, 363–371.
73.
PellowD (2016) Toward a critical environmental justice studies: Black lives matter as an environmental justice challenge. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race13(2): 221–236.
SovacoolBBellSEDaggettC, et al. (2023) Pluralizing energy justice: Incorporating feminist, anti-racist, Indigenous, and postcolonial perspectives. Energy Research & Social Science 97: 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2023.102996
83.
SpiegelSJ (2021) Fossil fuel violence and visual practices on Indigenous land: Watching, witnessing and resisting settler-colonial injustices. Energy Research & Social Science79: 102189.
84.
SteinmanE (2019) Why was Standing Rock and the #NoDAPL campaign so historic? Factors affecting American Indian participation in social movement collaborations and coalitions. Ethnic and Racial Studies42(7): 1070–1090.
85.
StokesLC (2020) Short Circuiting Policy: Interest Groups and the Battle Over Clean Energy and Climate Policy in the American States. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
86.
SveinsdóttirAJohnsonM (2022) Doubling down on DAPL: The contentious politics of pipeline governance in Illinois. Environmental Politics32(5): 861–882.
SweetEL (2015) Latina kitchen table planning saving communities: Intersectionality and insurgencies in an anti-immigrant city. Local Environment20(6): 728–743.
89.
SwyngedouwE (2018) Promises of the Political: Insurgent Cities in a Post-Political Environment. Massachusetts, USA: The MIT Press.
90.
SwyngedouwE (2022) Is emancipatory Politicization Still Possible Today? In Political Change through Social Innovation: A Debate. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
91.
TemperLAvilaSBeneDD, et al. (2020) Movements shaping climate futures: A systematic mapping of protests against fossil fuel and low-carbon energy projects. Environmental Research Letters15(12): 123004.
92.
The Combahee River Collective (1977) A black feminist statement. In: FreedmanEB (eds) The Essential Feminist Reader. New York, USA: Modern Library, 325–330 (2007).
93.
TracyS (2019) Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. 2nd ed. New Jersey, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
94.
TroutSBBrorbyT (eds) (2016) Fracture: Essays, Poems, and Stories on Fracking in America. Iowa, USA: Ice Cube Press, LLC.
VogelKJohnsonMFSveinsdóttirAG (2023) Communities at risk for mobilization: Neoliberal governance and the (un)contentious politics of the Dakota Access Pipeline in rural Illinois. Journal of Rural Studies99: 134–143.
97.
WalterMUrkidiL (2015) Community mining consultations in Latin America (2002-2012): The contested emergence of a hybrid institution for participation. Geoforum2015: 1–5.
