Aerial cable car construction has boomed across Latin America’s urban edges. The reinvented gondola lift has circulated as a prototype to remake the city’s peripheries from the inside out. Drawing on ethnographic research on the construction of a first urban cable car line in Bogotá, Colombia, I conceptualize cable car urbanism as a form of socio-technical, political, and aesthetic retrofit. As an emergent interface for material and epistemic practices, the urban gondola lift embodies a logic of governance based on the continual adjustment of and tinkering with existing socio-spatial realities. At the same time, it constitutes a platform for ongoing reinvention and reconfiguration from below. Tracking this interplay between official engineering and grounded autoconstruction critically illuminates the limits and promise of the politics of infrastructural retrofitting.
Álvarez RivadullaMJBocarejoD (2014)
Beautifying the slum: Cable car fetishism in Cazucá, Colombia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research38: 2025–2041.
2.
Álvarez RivadullaMJFleischerFHurtado TarazonaA (2024)
Making the State Care: The Role of Political Willingness and Brokerage in Bogota’s New Feminist Care Policy. In review.
3.
AnandN (2017) Hydraulic City: Water and the Infrastructures of Citizenship in Mumbai.
Durham:
Duke University Press.
4.
AnguelovskiIIrazábal-ZuritaCConnollyJJ (2019)
Grabbed urban landscapes: Socio‐spatial tensions in green infrastructure planning in Medellín. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research43(1): 133–156.
5.
AppelHAnandNGuptaA (2018) Introduction: Temporality, politics, and the promise of infrastructure. In: AnandNGuptaAAppelH (eds) The Promise of Infrastructure.
Durham:
Duke University Press, pp. 1–38.
6.
AppelH (2012)
Offshore work: Oil, modularity, and the how of capitalism in Equatorial Guinea. American Ethnologist39: 692–709.
7.
BaradK (2003)
Posthumanist performativity: Towards an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society28(3): 801–831.
8.
BijkerWE (1995) Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change.
Cambridge:
MIT Press.
9.
BjörkmanLHarrisA (2018)
Engineering cities: Mediating materialities, infrastructural imaginaries and shifting regimes of urban expertise. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research42: 244–262.
10.
BrandPDávilaJD (2011)
Mobility innovation at the urban margins. City15(6): 647–661.
11.
CavalcantiM (2014) Waiting in the ruins: The aesthetics and politics of favela urbanization in “PACification” Rio de Janeiro. In: GrahamSMcFarlaneC (eds) Infrastructural Lives: Urban Infrastructure in Context.
London:
Routledge, pp. 86–113.
12.
CavalcantiMCamposM (2022)
A Fantástica Obra da Paz: o Teleférico do Alemão e a Produção de Infraestrutura Urbana no Rio de Janeiro. Dados65(2): 1–32.
13.
CaldeiraTP (2017)
Peripheral urbanization: Autoconstruction, transversal logics, and politics in cities of the global south. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space35: 3–20.
14.
CesafskyL (2017)
How to mend a fragmented city: A critique of ‘infrastructural solidarity’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research41: 145–161.
15.
ChahimD (2022)
Governing beyond capacity: Engineering, banality, and the calibration of disaster in Mexico City. American Ethnologist49: 20–34.
16.
Corsín JiménezA (2014a)
Introduction: The prototype: More than many and less than one. Journal of Cultural Economy7: 381–398.
17.
Corsín JiménezA (2014b)
The right to infrastructure: a prototype for open source urbanism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space32: 342–362.
18.
Corsín JiménezA (2017)
Auto-construction redux: The city as method. Cultural Anthropology32(3): 450–478.
19.
DavisJL (2020) How Artifacts Afford: The Power and Politics of Everyday Things.
Cambridge:
MIT Press.
20.
DeleuzeG (1992) What is a dispositif? In ArmstrongTJ (ed.) Foucault: philosopher.
New York:
Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 159–168.
21.
Domínguez RubioF (2016)
On the discrepancy between objects and things. An ecological approach. Journal of Material Culture21(1): 59–86.
22.
EasterlingK (2014) Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space.
London:
Verso Books.
23.
GalvisJP (2020)
Del higienismo a la acupuntura urbana. Metáforas médicas y urbanismo excluyente en Bogotá. Territorios42: 195–223.
24.
GoldsteinD (2016) Outlawed: Between Security and Rights in a Bolivian City.
Durham:
Duke University Press.
25.
GriffinAYoungA (2023)
Violence against a backdrop of colours? Ethnographic insights into tensions between urban transformation and ongoing violence in marginalised neighbourhoods. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space41(7): 1351–1373.
26.
HarveyPKnoxH (2015) Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise.
Ithaca:
Cornell University Press.
27.
HodsonMMarvinS (2017)
The mutual construction of urban retrofit and scale: Governing ON, IN and WITH in Greater Manchester. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space35: 1198–1217.
28.
HommelsA (2008) Unbuilding Cities: Obduracy in Urban Sociotechnical Change.
Cambridge:
MIT Press.
29.
HookwayB (2014) Interface.
Cambridge:
MIT Press.
30.
HoweCLockremJAppelH, et al. (2016)
Paradoxical infrastructures: Ruins, retrofit, and risk. Science, Technology, & Human Values41: 547–565.
31.
JaffeRPilo’F (2023)
Security technology, urban prototyping, and the politics of failure. Security Dialogue54: 76–93.
32.
JohnsonCBellSBorrionA, et al. (2021)
Working with infrastructural communities: A material participation approach to urban retrofit. Science, Technology, and Human Values46(2): 320–345.
33.
KnoxH (2020) Thinking Like a Climate: Governing a City in Times of Environmental Change.
Durham:
Duke University Press.
34.
LarkinB (2018) Promising forms: The political aesthetics of infrastructure. In: AnandNGuptaAAppelH (eds) The Promise of Infrastructure.
Durham:
Duke University Press, pp. 165–202.
35.
LatourB (1996) Aramis or the Love of Technology.
Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
36.
MonteroS (2017)
Persuasive practitioners and the art of simplification: Mobilizing the “Bogotá Model” through storytelling. Novos Estudos36: 59–75.
37.
Molano CamargoF (2019)
El relleno sanitario Doña Juana en Bogotá: la producción política de un paisaje tóxico, 1988–2019. Historia Crítica74: 127–149.
38.
Molano RodríguezL (2011) La metáfora de la línea y el punto. MA Thesis, Universidad de los Andes.
39.
MurphyKM (2021) Form-giving as moral mediation. In: MurphyKMWilfEY (eds) Designs and Anthropologies: Frictions and Affinities.
Santa Fe: SAR Press; Albuquerque:
University of New Mexico Press.
40.
OushakineSA (2007)
“We’re nostalgic but we’re not crazy”: Retrofitting the Past in Russia. The Russian Review66: 451–482.
41.
PérezF (2020) An anatomy of failure: Planning after the fact in contemporary Bogotá. In: MackJHerzfeldM (eds) Life among Urban Planners: Practices, Professionalism, and Expertise in the Making of the City.
Philadelphia:
University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 100–118.
42.
PiconA (2018)
Urban infrastructure, imagination and politics: From the networked metropolis to the smart city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research42(2): 263–275.
43.
Rao V (2006)
Slum as theory: The South/Asian city and globalization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research30(1): 225–232.
44.
RedfieldP (2022)
Shaktopia: The meantime future of humanitarian design. Social Anthropology30(2): 16–33.
45.
ReynosoL (2023) Doris Salcedo, en la periferia de Bogotá: “El arte militante nos limita y reduce”. El País, 12 May 2023.
46.
RoyA (2011)
Slumdog cities: Rethinking subaltern urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research35(2): 223–238.
47.
ScottJC (1998)
Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven:
Yale University Press.
48.
SimoneA (2006)
Pirate towns: Reworking social and symbolic infrastructures in Johannesburg and Douala. Urban Studies43(2): 357–370.
49.
SotomayorL (2017)
Dealing with dangerous spaces: The construction of urban policy in Medellín. Latin American Perspectives44: 71–90.
50.
SuchmanL (2007) Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
TironiM (2020)
Prototyping public friction: Exploring the political effects of design testing in urban space. The British Journal of Sociology71: 503–519.
53.
WaterhouseAC (2019) Colombia’s National Protests Show that Infrastructure, Too, is Politics. NACLA, 3 December 2019.
54.
ZeidermanA (2016) Endangered City: The Politics of Risk and Security in Bogotá.
Durham:
Duke University Press.
