This article contributes to the geographical literature on reflexivity by asking what it means to take the researcher’s unconscious seriously in ethnographic research, and proposes psychoanalysis as a theoretical and methodological resource for researching the unconscious dimensions of fieldwork. I begin by describing three moments from my fieldwork with panhandlers and drug users that evince the operation of the unconscious. I then review psychoanalytic work in the social sciences where the researcher becomes the object of analysis and situate the debate on psychoanalytic methodology as an extension of earlier work on reflexivity by feminist geographers. I outline three methods for investigating the unconscious dimensions of fieldwork: analysis, supervision, and case consultation. Summarizing my experiments with these methods, I discuss: the discovery that key elements of my research were inextricably connected to my own anxieties as a researcher, how analysis of a dream from early in the fieldwork revealed phantasies rooted in childhood and a profoundly ambivalent relationship to my informants, and I propose a dialectical method for incorporating the revelations of psychoanalytic reflexivity into research. I conclude by discussing some of the possibilities and consequences of taking the unconscious dimensions of fieldwork seriously.
BarnesTGregoryD (1997) World geography: geography as situated knowledge. In: BarnesTGregoryD (eds) Reading Human Geography: The Poetics and Politics of Inquiry, London; New York: Arnold, pp. 14–25.
2.
BingleyA (2002) Research ethics in practice. In: BondiL (ed.) Subjectivities, Knowledges, and Feminist Geographies: The Subjects and Ethics of Social Research, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 208–222.
3.
BlumVSecorA (2011) Psychotopologies: Closing the circuit between psychic and material space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space29(6): 1030–1047.
4.
BondiL (1999) Stages on journeys: Some remarks about human geography and psychotherapeutic practice. Professional Geographer51(1): 11–24.
5.
BondiL (2003) Empathy and identification: Conceptual resources for feminist fieldwork. Acme: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies2(1): 64–76.
6.
BondiL (2013) Research and therapy: Generating meaning and feeling gaps. Qualitative Inquiry19(1): 9–19.
7.
BondiL (2014a) Understanding feelings: Engaging with unconscious communication and embodied knowledge. Emotion, Space and Society10(1): 1–11.
8.
BondiL (2014b) Feeling insecure: A personal account in a psychoanalytic voice. Social and Cultural Geography15(3): 332–350.
9.
Britton R (1989) The missing link: Parental sexuality in the Oedipus complex. In: J Steiner (ed.) The Oedipus complex today: Clinical implications. London: Karnac, pp. 83–101.
10.
Britton R (2004) Subjectivity, objectivity, and triangular space. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly 73(1): 47–61.
11.
CallardF (2003) The taming of psychoanalysis in geography. Social and Cultural Geography4(3): 295–312.
12.
ClarkeSHoggettP (2009) Researching Beneath the Surface: Psycho-Social Research Methods in Practice, London: Karnac.
13.
CliffordJMarcusGE (1986) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
DevereuxG (1967) From Anxiety to Method in the Behavioral Sciences, The Hague: Mouton.
15.
EnglandKVL (1994) Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. Professional Geographer46(1): 80–89.
16.
EvansD (1996) An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis, New York: Routledge.
17.
EwingKP (1993) Is psychoanalysis relevant for anthropology?New Directions in Psychological Anthropology3: 251–268.
18.
FanonF (1967) Black Skin, White Masks, New York: Grove Press.
19.
FinkB (1995) The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
FinkB (2004) Lacan to the Letter: Reading Ecrits Closely, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
21.
FinkB (2007) Fundamentals of Psychoanalytic Technique: A Lacanian Approach for Practitioners, New York: Norton.
22.
Freud S (2001) [1900] The interpretation of dreams. In: Strachey J (ed.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume IV (1900). London: Vintage.
23.
Freud (2001) [1901] On Dreams. In: The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume V (1900–1901). London: Vintage.
24.
Freud S (2001) [1904] Freud’s psycho-analytic procedure. In: Strachey J (ed.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume VII (1901–1905). London: Vintage, pp.247–254.
25.
Freud S (2001) [1912] A note on the unconscious in psychoanalysis. In: Strachey J (ed.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XII (1911–1913). London: Vintage, pp.255–266.
26.
Freud S (2001a) [1915] The unconscious. In: Strachey J (ed.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XIV (1914–1916). London: Vintage, pp.159–215.
27.
Freud S (2001b) [1915] Repression. In: Strachey J (ed.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XIV (1914–1916). London: Vintage, pp.141–158.
28.
Freud S (2001) [1917] Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis (Part III). In: Strachey J (ed.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XVI (1916–1917). London: Vintage.
29.
Freud S (2001) [1920] Beyond the pleasure principle. In: Strachey J (ed.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XVIII (1920–1922). London: Vintage, pp.1–64.
30.
Freud S (2001) [1932] New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. In: Strachey J (ed.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XXII (1932–1936). London: Vintage, pp.1–267.
31.
Frosh S (2003) Psychosocial studies and psychology: Is a critical approach emerging? Human Relations 56(12): 1545–1567.
32.
FroshSBaraitserL (2008) Psychoanalysis and psychosocial studies. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society13: 346–365.
33.
GraeberD (2014) Anthropology and the rise of the professional-managerial class. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory4(3): 73–88.
34.
Hollway W and Jefferson T (2000) Doing Qualitative Research Differently: Free Association, Narrative and the Interview Method. London: Sage Publications.
35.
HookD (2008) Articulating psychoanalysis and psychosocial studies: Limitations and possibilities. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society13(4): 397–405.
36.
HuntJC (1989) Psychoanalytic Aspects of Fieldwork, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
37.
JacksonM (2010) From anxiety to method in anthropological fieldwork: An appraisal of George Devereux’s enduring ideas. In: DaviesJSpencerD (eds) Emotions in the Field: The Psychology and Anthropology of Fieldwork Experience, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
38.
JervisS (2009) The use of self as a research tool. In: ClarkeSHoggettP (eds) Researching Beneath the Surface: Psycho-Social Research Methods in Practice, London: Karnac, pp. 145–166.
39.
JervisS (2014) Precious gift or poisoned chalice: What does psychoanalysis offer to social research? In: CullenKBondiLFewellJ (eds) Making Spaces: Putting Psychoanalytic Thinking to Work, London: Karnac.
40.
KatzC (1994) Playing the field: Questions of fieldwork in geography. Professional Geographer46(1): 67–72.
41.
KingsburyP (2007) The extimacy of space. Social and Cultural Geography8(2): 235–258.
42.
KingsburyP (2010) Locating the melody of the drives. The Professional Geographer62(4): 519–533.
43.
KingsburyP (2014) Becoming literate in desire with Alan Partridge. Cultural Geographies22(2): 329–344.
44.
Kobayashi A (1994) Coloring the field: Gender, ‘race,’ and the politics of fieldwork. The Professional Geographer 46(1): 73–80.
45.
KrackeWH (1981) Kagwahiv mourning: Dreams of a bereaved father. Ethos9(4): 258–275.
46.
KrackeW (2012) Psychoanalysis and anthropology. In: GabbardGOLitowitzBEWilliamsP (eds) Textbook of Psychoanalysis, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, pp. 477–494.
47.
LacanJ (1992) The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959–1960, New York: W.W. Norton.
48.
LacanJ (1998) The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis, New York: W.W. Norton.
49.
Lacan J (2006) [1949] The mirror stage as formative of the I function as revealed in psychoanalytic experience. In: Fink B (ed.) Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English. New York: W.W. Norton, pp.75–81.
50.
Lacan J (2006) [1953] The function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis. In: Fink B (ed.) Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English. New York: W.W. Norton, pp.197–268.
51.
LaplancheJPontalisJ-B (1973) The Language of Psycho-Analysis, New York: Norton.
52.
LevineS (1981) Dreams of the informant about the researcher: Some difficulties inherent in the research relationships. Ethos9(4): 276–293.
53.
McDowellL (1992) Doing gender: Feminism, feminists and research methods in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers17(4): 399–416.
54.
MadgeC (1993) Boundary disputes: Comments on Sidaway (1992). Area25(3): 294–299.
55.
MarcusGEFischerMMJ (1986) Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
MarksSMönnich-MarksH (2003) The analysis of counter-transference reactions is a means to discern latent interview-contents. Forum: Qualitative Social Research4(2): Art. 36.
57.
MerrifieldA (1995) Situated knowledge through exploration: Reflections on Bunge’s ‘geographical expeditions’. Antipode27(1): 49–70.
58.
NastHJ (1994) Women in the field: Critical feminist methodologies and theoretical perspectives. Professional Geographer46(1): 54–66.
59.
NastH (1998) The body as ‘place’: Reflexivity and fieldwork in Kano, Nigeria. In: NastHJPileS (eds) Places Through the Body, London: Routledge, pp. 93–116.
60.
OliverS (2003) Geography’s difficult engagement with the psychological therapies. Social and Cultural Geography4(3): 313–321.
61.
PileS (1991) Practising interpretative geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers16(4): 458–469.
62.
PileS (1993) Human agency and human geography revisited: A critique of ‘new models’ of the self. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers18(1): 122–139.
63.
PileS (1996) The Body and the City, London: Routledge.
64.
PileS (2010) Intimate distance: The unconscious dimensions of the rapport between researcher and researched. The Professional Geographer62(4): 483–495.
65.
PrattG (2000) Research performances. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18(5): 639–651.
66.
RabinowP (2007[1977]) Reflections on Fieldwork in Morocco, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
67.
Razack SH (2000) Gendered racial violence and spatialized justice: The murder of Pamela George. Canadian Journal of Law & Society 15(2): 91–130.
68.
RoseG (1997) Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography21(3): 305–320.
69.
SibleyD (2003) Geography and psychoanalysis: Tensions and possibilities. Social and Cultural Geography4(3): 391–399.
70.
SpielbergS (1981) Raiders of the Lost Ark, Paramount.
71.
Stepney E (2003) Bourdieu on Bourdieu: Reflexive sociology and the sociologist in society. Crossing Boundaries 1: 126–143.
72.
ThomasME (2007) The implications of psychoanalysis for qualitative methodology: The case of interviews and narrative data analysis. Professional Geographer59(4): 537–546.
73.
ThomasME (2010) Introduction: Psychoanalytic methodologies in geography. The Professional Geographer62(4): 478–482.
74.
WacquantL (2002) Scrutinizing the street: Poverty, morality, and the pitfalls of urban ethnography. American Journal of Sociology107(6): 1468–1532.
75.
Watson C (2009) The ‘impossible vanity': Uses and abuses of empathy in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Research 9(1): 105–117.
76.
WengrafT (2001) Qualitative Research Interviewing: Biographic Narrative and Semi-structured Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
77.
WhitakerMP (2010) Reflexivity. In: BarnardASpencerJ (eds) Routledge Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, pp. 594–596.
78.
ŽižekS (1989) The Sublime Object of Ideology. (Verso, New York).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
