‘Blurry’, ‘indeterminate’, and ‘elastic’ are terms used to describe the spatial, legal, and categorical ambiguities that have characterized the war–law–space nexus since September 11th. I argue here that these same qualities were central to the lawmaking process eighty years ago in the case of the Monaco Draft, a draft convention that proposed rules to establish hospital and safety towns, zones, and localities in order to strengthen international humanitarian law. This paper reviews the Monaco Draft’s spatial proposals from their conception in 1934 and their discussion at three expert consultations during the 1930s to their incorporation into the 1949 Geneva Conventions as nonbinding recommendations. An analysis of the conversations among experts charged with examining the proposed rules reveals how the interplay of territorial ideology with the more contingent realities of the battlefield produced uncertainties that conditioned the law. This was further complicated by the law’s customary basis, which makes untested legal measures especially risky. The broader significance of this research is that it presents a historical case showing the problematic nature of territory, uncertainty, and materializing norms as a continuing feature of humanitarian law.
AgnewJ (1994) “The territorial trap: the geographical assumptions of international relations theory”. Review of International Political Economy1: 53–80
2.
AgnewJ (2010) “Still trapped in territory?”. Geopolitics15: 779–784
3.
AppaduraiA (1996) “Sovereignty without territoriality: notes for a postnational geography”. In: YaegerP (eds) The Geography of Identity, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 40–58
4.
ArrighiG (1994) The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times, London: Verso
5.
Bainbridge W S, 1934 Seventh International Congress of Military Medicine and Pharmacy and Meetings of the Permanent Committee, Madrid, Spain, May 29–June 3, 1933 (George Banta, Menasha, WI)
6.
BassiouniM C (2000) “The normative framework of international humanitarian law: overlaps, gaps, ambiguities”. In: SchmittM N (eds) nternational Law Across the Spectrum of Conflict: Essays in Honour of Professor L.C. Green on the Occasion of his Eightieth Birthday, Newport, RI: Naval War College
7.
BeauchampS (2012) “ ‘Humanitarian space’ in search of a new home: (limited) guidance from international law”. In: PerrinB (eds) Modern Warfare: Armed Groups, Private Militaries, Humanitarian Organizations, and the Law, Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press
8.
BedermanD J (2010) Custom as a Source of Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
9.
BenvenistiE (2010) “The legal battle to define the law on transnational asymmetric warfare”. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law20: 339–359
10.
BenvenistiECohenA (2014) “War is governance: explaining the logic of the laws of war from a principal-agent perspective”. Michigan Law Review112: 1363–1416
11.
BessM (2006) Choices Under Fire: Moral Dimensions of World War II, New York: Alfred A Knopf
12.
BravermanIBlomleyNDelaneyDKedarA (2014) “Expanding spaces of law: a timely legal geography”. In: BravermanIBlomleyNDelaneyDKedarA (eds) The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 1–29
13.
BrighentiA M (2010) “On territorology: towards a general science of territory”. Theory, Culture and Society27: 52–72
14.
BrownlieI (1990) Principles of Public International Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press
15.
BuergenthalTMurphyS D (2007) Public International Law in a Nutshell, St Paul, MN: West Group
16.
BuignonF (2001) “Droit de Genève et droit de la Haye”. International Review of the Red Cross83(844): 901–922
17.
BuignonF (2003) The International Committee of the Red Cross and the Protection of War Victims, Geneva: ICRC
18.
Cambresier .. (1934) “The role of the military medical officer in the organization of the protection of the civil population against the danger of chemical warfare conducted from airplanes”. Bulletin International de Médecine Militaire, Brussels: Jean Vromans, pp. 206–216
19.
CarpenterC R (2005) “Women, children and other vulnerable groups: gender, strategic frames and the protection of civilians as a transnational issue”. International Studies Quarterly49: 295–334
20.
De la PradelleAVonckenJDehousseF (1934) La Reconstruction du Droit de la Guerre: Analyses, Documents, Projets, Paris: Les Editions Internationales
21.
DelaneyD (2003) “Beyond the word: law as a thing of this world”. In: HolderJHarrisonC (eds) Law and Geography: Current Legal Issues 2002, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 67–83
22.
DelaneyD (2010) The Spatial, the Legal, and the Pragmatics of World-making: Nomospheric Investigations, London: Routledge
23.
Der DerianJ (2009) Virtuous War: Mapping the Military–Industrial–Media–Entertainment–Network, New York: Routledge
24.
DetterI (2013) The Law of War, Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate
25.
DinsteinY (1984) “Human rights in armed conflict: international humanitarian law”. In: MeronT (eds) Human Rights in International Law: Legal and Policy Issues, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 345–368
26.
DunantH (1986) A Memory of Solferino, Geneva: ICRC
27.
EldenS (2009) Terror and Territory: The Spatial Extent of Sovereignty, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
28.
Equizabal C, Lewis D, Minear L, Sollis P, Weiss T G, 1993, “Humanitarian challenges in Central America: learning the lessons of recent armed conflict” Occasional Paper no 14, Thomas J Watson Jr, Institute for International Studies at Brown University, Providence, RI
29.
FrancoL (1995) “An examination of safety zones for internally displaced as a contribution toward prevention and solution of refugee problems”. In: Al-NaumimiNMeeseR (eds) International Legal Issues Arising under the United Nations Decade of International Law, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 871–898
30.
GasserH P (1993) International Humanitarian Law: An Introduction, Berne: Henry Dunant Institute
31.
GiladiR (2009) “Vices and virtues: revisiting the role of reciprocity in structuring international humanitarian law obligations”, unpublished manuscripthttp://law.huji.ac.il/upload/p_RotemGiladi.pdf
32.
GregoryD (2006) “The death of the civilian?”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space24: 633–638
33.
GregoryD (2011) “The everywhere war”. The Geographical Journal177: 238–250
34.
Hallam A, 1998, “Evaluating humanitarian assistance programmes in complex emergencies”, Good Practice Review no 7, Overseas Development Institute, London
35.
HilhorstDJansenB J (2010) “Humanitarian space as arena: a perspective on the everyday politics of aid”. Development and Change41: 1117–1139
36.
HyndmanJ (2003) “Preventive, palliative, or punitive? Safe spaces in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Somalia, and Sri Lanka”. Journal of Refugee Studies16: 167–185
37.
ICRC, International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva 1938, “Rapport relatif à l’interprétation, la revision et l’extension de la Convention de Genève du 27 juillet 1929” Revue International de la Croix-Rouge20(231) 193-244 1939, “Rapport du Comité international de la Croix-Rouge sur le projet de convention pour la création de localités et zones sanitaires en temps de guerre, adopté par la commission d’experts réunie à Genève les 21 et 22 octobre 1938” Revue International de la Croix-Rouge21(243) 161-201 1946, “Report concerning hospital and safety localities and zones”, series IV, No. 1 for the Preliminary Conference of National Red Cross Societies for the study of the conventions and of various problems relative to the Red Cross, May 1946”, Geneva 1947a, “Report on the work of the preliminary conference of National Red Cross Societies for the Study of the Conventions and of Various Problems relative to the Red Cross, Geneva, July 26–August 3, 1946” 1947b, “Report on the work of the conference of government experts for the study of the conventions for the protection of war victims, Geneva, April 14–26, 1947” 1948, “Draft revised or new conventions for the protection of war victims”, report 4a for the XVIIth International Red Cross Conference, Stockholm 1952 Hospital Localities and Safety Zones 2004, “What is international humanitarian law?” Advisory Service On International Humanitarian Law, http://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/what_is_ihl.pdf
38.
JabriV (2006) “War, security and the liberal state”. Security Dialogue33: 47–64
39.
JochnickCNormandR (1994) “The legitimation of violence: a critical history of the laws of war”. Harvard International Law Journal35: 49–95
40.
KaldorM (2012) New and Old Wars, Cambridge: Polity Press
41.
KasherA (2007) “The principle of distinction”. Journal of Military Ethics6: 152–167
42.
KennedyD (2006) Of War and Law, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
43.
KinsellaH M (2006) “Gendering Grotius: sex and sex difference in the laws of war”. Political Theory34: 161–191
44.
KinsellaH M (2011) The Image Before the Weapon: A Critical History of the Distinction Between Combatant and Civilian, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
45.
Kleffner J K, 2007, “From ‘belligerents’ to ‘fighters’ and civilians directly participating in hostilities: on the principle of distinction in non-international armed conflicts one hundred years after the second Hague peace conference” Netherlands International Law Review54 315–336
46.
KleinfeldM (2007) “Misreading the post-tsunami political landscape in Sri Lanka: the myth of humanitarian space”. Space and Polity11: 169–184
47.
KleinfeldM (2009) “The political utility of the nonpolitical child in Sri Lanka’s armed conflict”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers99: 874–883
48.
LandgrenK (1995) “Safety zones and international protection: a dark grey area”. International Journal of Refugee Law7: 436–458
49.
MagoneCNeumanMWeissmanF (2012) Humanitarian Negotiations Revealed: The MSF Experience, London: Hurst
50.
MeronT (1989) Human Rights and Humanitarian Norms as Customary Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press
51.
MinearLWeissT G (1995) Mercy under Fire: War and the Global Humanitarian Community, Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 38–45
52.
MitchellC (2007) “The theory and practice of sanctuary: from Asylia to local zones of peace”. In: HancockL EMitchellC (eds) Zones of Peace, Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press
53.
MurphyJ F (2010) The Evolving Dimensions of International Law: Hard Choices for the World Community, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
54.
NormandRJochnickC (1994) “The legitimation of violence: a critical analysis of the Gulf war”. Harvard International Law Journal35: 387–416
55.
Ó TuathailGLukeT W (1994) “Present at the (dis)integration: deterritorialization and reterritorialization in the new wor(l)d order”. Annals of the American Geographers84: 381–398
56.
OIDMM, 1934, “Vers l’humanisation de la guerre: réunion des médecins et des juristes au palais de Monaco, 5–11 Février 1934, délibérations et conclusions”, annex to the Bulletin International de Médecine Militaire Office International de Documentation de Médecine Militaire
57.
ParasramA (2012) “Erasing Tamil Eelam: de/re territorialisation in the global war on terror”. Geopolitics17: 903–925
58.
ParisiFFonV (2009) The Economics of Lawmaking, Oxford: Oxford University Press
59.
PearsonZ (2008) “Spaces of international law”. Griffith Law Review17: 489–513
60.
Philippopoulos-MihalopoulosA (2010) “Law’s spatial turn: geography, justice and a certain fear of space”. Law, Culture and the Humanities7: 187–202
61.
PictetJ S (1958) Commentary of the Fourth Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, Geneva: ICRC
62.
PilloudCDe PreuxJSandozYZimmermannBEberlinPGasserH PWengerC F (1987) Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, Geneva: Martinus Nijhoff
63.
ProctorT M (2010) Civilians in a World at War, 1914–1918, New York: New York University Press
64.
Reynders .. (1934) “The military medical service of a mobilized nation”. Bulletin International de Médecine Militaire, Brussels: Jean Vromans, pp. 141–152
65.
RosenneS (1984) Practice and Methods of International Law, London: Oceana Publications
66.
RuggieG R (1993) “Territoriality and beyond: problematizing modernity in international relations”. International Organization47: 139–174
67.
Saint-PaulG (1930) “Lieux de Genève”. Revue International de la Croix-Rouge12(144): 1066–1068
68.
Sandoz Y, 1994, “The establishment of safety zones for persons displaced within their country of origin”, report for the Multi-choice Conference on International Legal Issues Arising Under the United Nations Decade of International Law, Doha, Qatar, 22–25 March
69.
SchauerF (2007) “Pitfalls in the interpretation of customary law”. In: Perreau-SaussineAMurphyJ B (eds) The Nature of Customary Law: Legal, Historical and Philosophical Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13–34
70.
SchickeléJ M A (1934) “The classification of sick and wounded in the field”. 3e Session de l’Office International de Documentation de Médecine Militaire (Comité Permanent des Congrès Internationaux de Médecine et de Pharmacie Militaires), Grenade 1933, BrusselsTravaux publiés par le Bulletin International de Médecine Militaire
71.
SchmittM N (2010) “Military necessity and humanity in international humanitarian law: preserving the delicate balance”. Virginia Journal of International Law50: 795–839
72.
SFPD, 1949, “Final record of the diplomatic conference of Geneva of 1949, volume II, section A”, Swiss Federal Political Department, Berne
73.
SlimH (2003) “Why protect civilians? Innocence, immunity and enmity in war”. International Affairs79: 481–501
74.
TanakaUYoungM B (2009) Bombing Civilians: A Twentieth-century History, New York: The New Press
75.
TakemotoM (1989) “Historical background of the definition of military objectives”. Kansai University Review of Law and Politics10: 29–53
76.
TaylorP (1994) “The state as container: territoriality in the modern world-system”. Progress in Human Geography18: 151–152
77.
ThomannJ (1933) “VIIe Congrès international de médicine et de pharmacie militaires à Madrid”. Revue International de la Croix-Rouge15(176): 650–658
78.
USAID (2002) “Foreign aid in the national interest: promoting freedom security, and opportunity”, Washington, DCUnited States Agency for International Development
79.
Van BrabantK (1999) Opening the Black Box: An Outline of a Framework to Understand, Promote and Evaluate Humanitarian Coordination, London: Overseas Development Institute
