The local level and private actors play an important role in the implementation of climate change adaptation. The engagement of the private sector and citizens has received increasing attention in recent years. Local authorities' choice of policy instruments, the distribution of responsibilities and the benefits of adaptation as a public or a private good have a bearing on the involvement of private actors. Based on interviews and documents from Copenhagen and Helsinki, we analyse how public authorities' choices, to whom and how they shift responsibilities, can foster transformational, participatory or market-oriented elements of adaptation. The results indicate that local authorities play a dominant role in providing adaptation. Public authorities steer where the private sector and citizens are expected to take responsibilities. This mix of top-down steering, market mechanisms and citizen involvement might reduce the advantages that a shift of responsibilities towards private actors could provide for the handling of climate change adaptation.
AmaruSChhetriNB (2013) Climate adaptation: Institutional response to environmental constraints, and the need for increased flexibility, participation, and integration of approaches. Applied Geography39: 128–139.
5.
AnguelovskiICarminJ (2011) Something borrowed, everything new: innovation and institutionalization in urban climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability3(3): 169–175.
6.
ArnsteinSR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners35(4): 216–224.
7.
BaronNPetersenLK (2015) Climate change or variable weather: Rethinking Danish homeowners' perceptions of floods and climate. Regional Environmental Change15: 1145–1155.
8.
BauerAFeichtingerJSteurerR (2012) The governance of climate change adaptation in 10 OECD countries: Challenges and approaches. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning14(3): 279–304.
9.
BirklandTA (1997) After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events, Washington: Georgetown University Press.
10.
BirkmannJGarschagenMKraasF (2010) Adaptive urban governance: New challenges for the second generation of urban adaptation strategies to climate change. Sustainability Science5(2): 185–206.
11.
BlennowKPerssonJ (2009) Climate change: Motivation for taking measure to adapt. Global Environmental Change19(1): 100–104.
12.
BrinkEAaldersTÁdámD (2016) Cascades of green: A review of ecosystem-based adaptation in urban areas. Global Environmental Change36: 111–123.
13.
BulkeleyH (2005) Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks. Political Geography24(8): 875–902.
14.
BulkeleyH (2013) Cities and Climate Change, London: Routledge.
15.
BulkeleyHBetsillMM (2013) Revisiting the urban politics of climate change. Environmental Politics22(1): 136–154.
16.
BurtonPMustelinJ (2013) Planning for climate change: Is greater public participation the key to success?. Urban Policy and Research31(4): 399–415.
17.
CarterJG (2011) Climate change adaptation in European cities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability3(3): 193–198.
18.
CarterJGCavanGConnellyA (2015) Climate change and the city: Building capacity for urban adaptation. Progress in Planning95: 1–66.
19.
City of Copenhagen (2011) Copenhagen Climate Adaptation Plan, Copenhagen: Climate Capital Copenhagen.
20.
City of Copenhagen (2012) Cloudburst Management Plan 2012, Copenhagen: The City of Copenhagen, Technical and Environmental Administration.
21.
City of Helsinki. (2013) Helsingin kaupungin tulvaohje – Asukkaiden ja omaisuuden suojaaminen tulvavaara-alueilla Helsingissä. Helsinki: City of Helsinki.
22.
City of Helsinki Urban Facts (2014) Statistical Yearbook of Helsinki 2014, Helsinki: City of Helsinki.
23.
Danish Nature Agency (2012) Action Plan for a Climate-Proof Denmark – How to Manage Cloudburst and Rain Water, Copenhagen: Task Force for Climate Change Adaptation – Danish Nature Agency.
24.
DessaiSHulmeM (2004) Does climate adaptation policy need probabilities?. Climate Policy4(2): 107–128.
25.
European Commission (2007) Adapting to Climate Change in Europe – Options for EU Action – Green Paper, Brussels: European Commission.
26.
European Commission (2013) EU Strategy on Adaptation to Climate Change, COM 2013/216, Brussels: European Commission.
27.
FelliRCastreeN (2012) Neoliberalising adaptation to environmental change: Foresight or foreclosure?. Environment and Planning A44(1): 1–4.
28.
FünfgeldHMcEvoyD (2014) Frame divergence in climate change adaptation policy: Insights from Australian local government planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32(4): 603–622.
29.
GeavesLHPenning-RowsellEC (2016) Flood risk management as a public or a private good, and the implications for stakeholder engagement. Environmental Science & Policy55(2): 281–291.
30.
GrothmannTPattA (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change15(3): 199–213.
31.
Haapala A and Järvelä E (2014) Helsingin ilmastonmuutokseen sopeutumisen toimenpiteiden priorisointi. Helsinki: Helsingin kaupungin ympäristökeskus.
32.
HarmanBPTaylorBMLaneMB (2015) Urban partnerships and climate adaptation: challenges and opportunities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability12: 74–79.
HuntAWatkissP (2011) Climate change impacts and adaptation in cities: A review of the literature. Climatic Change104(1): 13–49.
37.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC). FieldCBBarrosVRDokkenDJ (2014a) Summary for policymakers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–32.
38.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014b) In: Barros VR, Field CB, Dokken DJ, et al. (eds) Annex II: Glossary [Agard, J., E.L.F. Schipper, J. Birkmann, M. Campos, C. Dubeux, Y. Nojiri, L. Olsson, B. Osman-Elasha, M. Pelling, M.J. Prather, M.G. Rivera-Ferre, O.C. Ruppel, A. Sallenger, K.R. Smith, A.L. St Clair, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, and T.E. Bilir (eds)]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1757–1776.
39.
JordanAWurzelRKZitoA (2005) The rise of ‘new’policy instruments in comparative perspective: Has governance eclipsed government?. Political Studies53(3): 477–496.
40.
JuholaS (2010) Mainstreaming climate change adaptation: The case of multi-level governance in Finland. In: KeskitaloECH (ed.) Developing Adaptation Policy and Practice in Europe: Multi-level Governance of Climate Change, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 149–187.
41.
JuholaS (2013) Adaptation to climate change in the private and the third sector: Case study of governance of the Helsinki Metropolitan region. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy31(5): 911–925.
42.
JuholaSWesterhoffL (2011) Challenges of adaptation to climate change across multiple scales: A case study of network governance in two European countries. Environmental Science & Policy14(3): 239–247.
43.
Kern K and Alber G (2008) Governing climate change in cities: modes of urban climate governance in multi-level systems. In: Competitive Cities and Climate Change, OECD Conference Proceedings, Milan, Italy, 9–10 October 2008, pp. 171–196. Paris: OECD.
44.
KeskitaloECH (2010) Introduction–adaptation to climate change in Europe: Theoretical framework and study design. In: KeskitaloECH (ed.) Developing Adaptation Policy and Practice in Europe: Multi-level Governance of Climate Change, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1–38.
45.
KleinJ (2016) Embeddedness of climate change adaptation: Established procedures and contending discourses for flood protection in Espoo, Finland. Local Environment22(2): 254–271.
46.
KleinJMäntysaloRJuholaS (2016) Legitimacy of urban climate change adaptation: A case in Helsinki. Regional Environmental Change16(3): 815–826.
47.
KoerthJVafeidisATCarreteroS (2014) A typology of household-level adaptation to coastal flooding and its spatio-temporal patterns. SpringerPlus3(466): 1–10.
KonradKAThumM (2014) The role of economic policy in climate change adaptation. CESifo Economic Studies60(1): 32–61.
50.
KuronenMJunnilaSMajamaaW (2010) Public–private–people partnership as a way to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from residential development. International Journal of Strategic Property Management14(3): 200–216.
51.
KvistJ (1999) Welfare reform in the Nordic countries in the 1990s: Using fuzzy-set theory to assess conformity to ideal types. Journal of European Social Policy9(3): 231–252.
52.
MeesHLDriessenPPRunhaarHA (2012) Exploring the scope of public and private responsibilities for climate adaptation. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning14(3): 305–330.
53.
MeesHLDriessenPPRunhaarHA (2014) Legitimate adaptive flood risk governance beyond the dikes: The cases of Hamburg, Helsinki and Rotterdam. Regional Environmental Change14(2): 671–682.
54.
MeesHLDriessenPPRunhaarHA (2015) “Cool” governance of a “hot” climate issue: Public and private responsibilities for the protection of vulnerable citizens against extreme heat. Regional Environmental Change15: 1065–1079.
55.
MendelsohnR (2006) The role of markets and governments in helping society adapt to a changing climate. Climatic Change78(1): 203–215.
56.
MMM (2011) Laki poikkeuksellisten tulvien aiheuttamien vahinkojen korvaamisesta annetun lain kumoamisesta, Helsinki: Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.
57.
MMM (2014) Kansallinen ilmastonmuutokseen sopeutumissuunnitelma 2022, Helsinki: Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.
58.
NurmiPHeinonenTJylhänlehtoM (2008) Helsingin kaupungin hulevesistrategia, Helsinki: Helsinki Public Works Department, Street and Park Division.
59.
O'HarePWhiteIConnellyA (2016) Insurance as maladaptation: Resilience and the ‘business as usual’paradox. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy34(6): 1175–1193.
60.
OsberghausDFinkelEPohlM (2010a) Individual Adaptation to Climate Change: The Role of Information and Perceived Risk, Mannheim: Centre for European Economic Research.
61.
OsberghausDDannenbergAMennelT (2010b) The role of the government in adaptation to climate change. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy28(5): 834.
62.
Penning-RowsellEPardoeJ (2015) The distributional consequences of future flood risk management in England and Wales. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy33(5): 1301–1321.
63.
PhadkeRManningCBurlagerS (2015) Making it personal: Diversity and deliberation in climate adaptation planning. Climate Risk Management9: 62–76.
64.
RickardsLIsonRFünfgeldH (2014) Opening and closing the future: Climate change, adaptation, and scenario planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32(4): 587–602.
65.
Romero-LankaoPHughesSRosas-HuertaA (2013) Institutional capacity for climate change responses: An examination of construction and pathways in Mexico City and Santiago. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy31(5): 785–805.
66.
Statistics Denmark (2015) Population at the First Day of the Quarter by Municipality, Sex, Age, Marital Status, Ancestry, Country of Origin and Citizenship. Available at: http://statistikbanken.dk/statbank5a/default.asp?w=768 (accessed 15 August 2015).
67.
StokerG (1998) Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal50(155): 17–28.
68.
TaylorBMHarmanBP (2016) Governing urban development for climate risk: What role for public–private partnerships?. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy34(5): 927–944.
69.
TennekesJDriessenPPvan RijswickHF (2013) Out of the comfort zone: Institutional context and the scope for legitimate climate adaptation policy. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning16(2): 241–259.
70.
The Integrated Urban Renewal in Skt. Kjeld's (2011) Integrated Urban Renewal in Skt. Kjeld's – A Neighbourhood in Motion, The Integrated Urban Renewal in Skt. Kjeld's: Copenhagen.
71.
ThynneIPetersBG (2015) Addressing the present and the future in government and governance: Three approaches to organising public action. Public Administration and Development35(2): 73–85.
72.
TompkinsELEakinH (2012) Managing private and public adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change22(1): 3–11.
73.
UrwinKJordanA (2008) Does public policy support or undermine climate change adaptation? Exploring policy interplay across different scales of governance. Global Environmental Change18(1): 180–191.
74.
Van AsseltMBRennO (2011) Risk governance. Journal of Risk Research14(4): 431–449.
75.
WamslerC (2016) From risk governance to city–citizen collaboration: Capitalizing on individual adaptation to climate change. Environmental Policy and Governance26: 184–204.
76.
WamslerCBrinkE (2014) Interfacing citizens' and institutions' practice and responsibilities for climate change adaptation. Urban Climate7: 64–91.
77.
WamslerCBrinkE (2015) The role of individual adaptive practices for sustainable adaptation. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment6(1): 6–29.
78.
WardekkerJAde JongAKnoopJM (2010) Operationalising a resilience approach to adapting an urban delta to uncertain climate changes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change77(6): 987–998.
79.
WejsA (2014) Integrating climate change into governance at the municipal scale: An institutional perspective on practices in Denmark. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32(6): 1017–1035.
80.
YrjöläTViinanenJ (2012) Keinoja ilmastonmuutokseen sopeutumiseksi Helsingin kaupungissa, Helsinki: Helsingin kaupunki Ympäristökeskus.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
