Cap-and-trade,crowding out,and the implications for municipal climate policy motivations

Abstract

Cities have emerged as important actors in climate change policy, implementing measures to reduce emissions from transportation, buildings, and waste. More recently, states such as California have implemented cap-and-trade programs to control greenhouse gases. However, a state-level cap handcuffs cities: by fixing emissions at the level of the cap, it precludes local governments from further reducing aggregate emissions. In this paper, we examine whether cities respond to the changed incentives presented by state-level programs. We find no evidence for crowding out: cities plan their emission reductions in similar ways regardless of state-level cap-and-trade programs. Our results suggest that cities likely have a range of motivations for their climate policy efforts- not simply a altruistic desire to improve the global environment.

Keywords

Climate action plan cap-and-trade California municipal climate policy crowding out

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adler

(2007) When is two a crowd? The impact of federal action on state environmental regulation. Harvard Environmental Law Review 31: 67–114.

Andreoni

(1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal 100(401): 464–477.

Bedsworth

Hanak

(2013) Climate policy at the local level: Insights from California. Global Environmental Change 23: 664–677.

Bellini

Ottaviano

GIP

Pinelli

(2013) Cultural diversity and economic performance: Evidence from European regions. In: Crescenzi

Percoco

(eds) Geography, Institutions and Regional Economic Performance, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 121–141.

Betsill

Bulkeley

(2007) Looking back and thinking ahead: A decade of cities and climate change research. Local Environment 12: 447–456.

Boswell MR and Greve AI (2012) Climate Action Plan Database. Unpublished dataset.

Boswell

Greve

Seale

(2010) An assessment of the link between greenhouse gas emissions inventories and climate action plans. Journal of the American Planning Association 76(4): 451–462.

Braaten

(2014) Testing deontological warm glow motivation for carbon abatements. Resource and Energy Economics 38: 96–109.

Brown EG, Rodriquez M, Nichols M, et al. (2014) First update to the climate change scoping plan: Building on the framework, California Air Resources Board. Available at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2013_update/first_update_climate_change_scoping_plan.pdf (accessed 16 February 2016).

10.

Bulkeley

(2005) Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks. Political Geography 24: 875–902.

11.

Bulkeley H and Betsill MM (2003) Cities and climate change: Urban sustainability and global environmental governance. Routledge studies in physical geography and environment. London: Routledge.

12.

Butler

Macey

(1996) Externalities and the matching principle: The case for reallocating environmental regulatory authority. Yale Law & Policy Review 14: 23–66.

13.

California Air Resources Board (2015) Archived auction information and results. Available at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/auction/auction_archive.htm (accessed 16 February 2016).

14.

Castán Broto

Bulkeley

(2013) A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Global Environmental Change 23: 92–102.

15.

Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (2014) California Cap-and-Trade Program Summary. Available at: http://www.c2es.org/docUploads/calif-cap-trade-01-14.pdf (accessed 16 February 2016).

16.

City of Alameda (2008) Local Action Plan for Climate Protection. Available at: http://alamedaca.gov/sites/default/files/document-files/local_action_plan_for_climate_protection.pdf (accessed 28 February 2016).

17.

City of Berkeley (1998) City of Berkeley Resource Conservation and Global Warming Abatement Plan. Available at: http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/climate-protection-program/berkeleyclimateactionplan.pdf (accessed 28 February 2016).

18.

City of Citrus Heights (2011) Citrus Heights Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan. Available at: http://www.citrusheights.net/203/Greenhouse-Gas-Reduction-Plan (accessed 28 February 2016).

19.

City of Fullerton (2012) The Fullerton Plan: Climate Action Plan. Available at: https://www.cityoffullerton.com/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?blobid=8991 (accessed 28 February 2016).

20.

City of Hayward (2009) Climate Action Plan. Available at: http://www.hayward-ca.gov/GREEN-HAYWARD/CLIMATE-ACTION-PLAN/pdfs/2009/CAP_Final/Hayward_CAP_FINAL_11-6-09%20-%20full%20document.pdf (accessed 28 February 2016).

21.

City of Menlo Park (2009) Climate Change Action Plan. Available at: http://www.menlopark.org/DocumentCenter/View/1346 (accessed 28 February 2016).

22.

City of San Carlos (2009) Climate Action Plan. Available at: http://www.cityofsancarlos.org/generalplanupdate/whats_new_/climate_action_plan___adopted.asp (accessed 28 February 2016).

23.

City of San Diego (2012) Climate Mitigation and Adaptation Plan. Available at: http://www.sandiego.gov/environmental-services/pdf/sustainable/finalcmap.pdf (accessed 28 February 2016).

24.

City of San Francisco (2004) Climate Action Plan for San Francisco: Local Actions to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Available at: http://sfenvironment.org/sites/default/files/fliers/files/climateactionplan.pdf (accessed 28 February 2016).

25.

DeShazo

Matute

(2012) The local regulation of climate change. In: Crane

Weber

(eds) The Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 455–476.

26.

Dinan

Stocking

(2012) U.S. cap-and-trade markets: Constraining participants, transactions, and prices. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 6(2): 169–189.

27.

Dodman

(2009) Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories. Environment and Urbanization 21(1): 185–201.

28.

Engel

Orbach

(2008) Micro-motives and state and local climate change initiatives. Harvard Law & Policy Review 2: 119.

29.

Euro-CASE (2014) Reform options for the European Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), European Council of Academies of Applied Sciences, Technologies and Engineering, Paris. Available at http://www.acatech.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Baumstruktur_nach_Website/Acatech/root/de/Aktuelles___Presse/Presseinfos___News/ab_2014/Euro-CASE_policy_paper_ETS_reform.pdf (accessed 16 February 2016).

30.

Flyvbjerg

(2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12: 219–245.

31.

Glaeser

Kahn

(2004) Sprawl and urban growth. In: Henderson

Thisse

J-F

(eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Vol. 4: Cities and Geography, Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 2481–2527.

32.

Glaeser

Kahn

(2010) The greenness of cities: Carbon dioxide emissions and urban development. Journal of Urban Economics 67(3): 404–418.

33.

Goulder

(2013) Markets for pollution allowances: What are the (new) lessons?”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 27: 87–102.

34.

Hale

Long

(2011) Did foreign direct investment put an upward pressure on wages in China?”. IMF Economic Review 59(3): 404–430.

35.

Henderson P (2011) The California Carbon Rush. Reuters Special Report, Carbon Trading. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-california-carbon-idUSTRE71G3R220110217 (accessed 26 February 2016).

36.

Hooghe

Marks

(2003) Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review 97: 233–243.

37.

Hsia-Kiung K and Morehouse E (2014) Carbon market California: A comprehensive analysis of the Golden State's cap-and-trade program, Environmental Defense Fund. Available at: http://www.edf.org/sites/default/files/content/carbon-market-california-year_two.pdf (accessed 16 February 2016).

38.

ICLEI USA (2009) U.S. local sustainability plans and climate action plans. Available at: http://www.icleiusa.org/action-center/planning/List%20of%20U.S.%20Sustainability%20and%20Climate%20Plans.pdf (accessed 16 February 2016).

39.

ICLEI USA (2010) Empowering sustainable communities: ICLEI USA annual report 2010. Available at: http://www.icleiusa.org/library/documents/ICLEI_USA_Annual_Report_2010.pdf (accessed 16 February 2016).

40.

Knight

(2002) Endogenous federal grants and crowd-out of state government spending: Theory and evidence from the federal highway aid program. The American Economic Review 92: 71–92.

41.

Kousky

Schneider

(2003) Global climate policy: Will cities lead the way? Climate Policy 3(4): 359–372.

42.

Krause

(2011a) Policy innovation, intergovernmental relations, and the adoption of climate protection initiatives by US cities. Journal of Urban Affairs 33: 45–60.

43.

Krause

(2011b) Symbolic or substantive policy? Measuring the extent of local commitment to climate protection. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 29(1): 46–62.

44.

Krause

(2013) The motivations behind municipal climate engagement: An empirical assessment of how local objectives shape the production of a public good. Cityscape 15(1): 125–141.

45.

Kübler

Pagano

(2012) Urban politics as multilevel analysis. In: Mossberger

Clarke

John

(eds) The Oxford Handbook of Urban Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 114–132.

46.

Kwon

Jang

Feiock

(2014) Climate protection and energy sustainability policy in California cities: What have we learned? Journal of Urban Affairs 36(5): 905–924.

47.

Lefèvre

(2012) Incorporating cities into the post-2012 climate change agreements. Environment and Urbanization 24(2): 575–595.

48.

Lemos

Agrawal

(2006) Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31: 297–325.

49.

Long

(2010) Does the rights hypothesis apply to China? Journal of Law and Economics 53(4): 629–650.

50.

Lutsey

Sperling

(2008) America’s bottom-up climate change mitigation policy. Energy Policy 36(2): 673–685.

51.

Meadowcroft

(2002) Politics and scale: Some implications for environmental governance. Landscape and Urban Planning 61(2–4): 169–179.

52.

Millard-Ball

(2009) Cap-and-trade: Five implications for transportation planners. Transportation Research Record 2119: 20–26.

53.

Millard-Ball

(2012) Do city climate plans reduce emissions? Journal of Urban Economics 71(3): 289–311.

54.

Millard-Ball

(2013) The limits to planning: Causal impacts of city climate action plans. Journal of Planning Education and Research 33(1): 5–19.

55.

Moser

(2007) In the long shadows of inaction: The quiet building of a climate protection movement in the United States. Global Environmental Politics 7(2): 124–144.

56.

Noussair

van Soest

(2014) Economic experiments and environmental policy. Annual Review of Resource Economics 6: 319–337.

57.

OPR (2009) The California Planners’ Book of Lists 2010. Sacramento: Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. Available at: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/2010bol.pdf (accessed 16 February 2016).

58.

Perino G (2013) Private provision of public goods in a second-best world: Cap-and-trade schemes limit green consumerism. Centre for Behavioral and, Experimental Social Science, University of East Anglia, Discussion Paper 13–1.

59.

Shobe

Burtraw

(2012) Rethinking environmental federalism in a warming world. Climate Change Economics 3: 1250018.

60.

Stone

Vargo

Habeeb

(2012) Managing climate change in cities: Will climate action plans work? Landscape and Urban Planning 107: 263–271.

61.

Tang

Brody

Quinn

(2010) Moving from agenda to action: Evaluating local climate change action plans. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 53(1): 41–62.

62.

Trisolini

(2010) All hands on deck: Local governments and the potential for bidirectional climate change regulation. Stanford Law Review 62: 669–746.

63.

Twomey

Betz

MacGill

(2012) Achieving additional emission reductions under a cap-and-trade scheme. Climate Policy 12(4): 424–439.

64.

Wang

(2013) Adopting local climate policies: What have California cities done and why?”. Urban Affairs Review 49(4): 593–613.

65.

Wheeler

(2008) State and municipal climate change plans: The first generation. Journal of the American Planning Association 74(4): 481–496.

66.

Zahran

Grover

Brody

(2008) Risk, stress, and capacity: Explaining metropolitan commitment to climate protection. Urban Affairs Review 43: 447–474.